GeForce RTX 3090 TiVSIntel Arc A310
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERGeForce RTX 3090 Ti+115%Better gaming performance
NVIDIA
RTX 3090 Ti
VSWINNERRTX 3090 Ti73%Better gaming performance
Intel
Arc A310
Performance7133
Efficiency53100
Price / performance57100
Data confidence6969
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti vs Intel Arc A310: key takeaway
The comparison of RTX 3090 Ti and Arc A310 shows a 115% advantage for RTX 3090 Ti in gaming performance, while Arc A310 may still be stronger in value for money. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIAIntelPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
7133
53100
57100
10060
COMPARISON RESULT
RTX 3090 Ti is the best overall choice
RTX 3090 Ti leads in combined game performance. Arc A310 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
RTX 3090 Ti leads in the combined performance index
Arc A310 costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 44–49of 61
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
0 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Intel Arc A310
100/100 · Price $169The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares RTX 3090 Ti and Arc A310 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
71Better
33
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
58Better
30
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
55Better
28
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
53
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
65Better
58
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares RTX 3090 Ti and Arc A310 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DisplayPort3x DisplayPort 1.4a4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI1x HDMI 2.1HDMI 2.1
Device classDesktopDesktop
UpscalingDLSS 2XeSS
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
USB Type-CNoNo
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS40Better2.688
Power consumption450 W75 WBetter
Memory typeGDDR6XGDDR6
Power connector16 pinNone
Release date20222022
ArchitectureAmpereXe-HPG
ThicknessTriple-slotSingle-slot
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.6OpenCL 3.0
Launch price$1999$169Better
Shader units / cores10752Better768
Clock speed1560 - 1860 MHz1750 - 2000 MHzBetter
Base clock1560 MHz1750 MHzBetter
Boost clock1860 MHz2000 MHzBetter
VRAM24 GB GDDR6XBetter4 GB GDDR6
Memory frequency21 GHzBetter15,5 GHz
Memory bus384 bitBetter64 bit
Memory bandwidth1008 GB/sBetter124 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 4x8
Power consumption450 W75 WBetter
Process node8 nm6 nmBetter
Recommended PSU850 W200 WBetter
Length336 mmVaries by board
Die size628 mm²157 mm²Better
Memory cacheL1 128 KB, L2 6 MBL2 4 MBBetter
Transistor count28300 millionBetter7200 million
Max monitors44
GAME TEST BENCH
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RTX 3090 Ti and Arc A310 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RTX 3090 TiArc A310
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong
1080p High
35 FPSEstimated 66%
20 FPSEstimated 64%
1080p Ultra
29 FPSEstimated 66%
17 FPSEstimated 64%
1440p Ultra
22 FPSEstimated 66%
9 FPSEstimated 58%
4K Ultra
13 FPSEstimated 66%
5 FPSEstimated 55%
Black Myth: Wukong35Estimated 66%20Estimated 64%29Estimated 66%17Estimated 64%22Estimated 66%9Estimated 58%13Estimated 66%5Estimated 55%
Call of Duty: Warzone35Estimated 66%20Estimated 64%29Estimated 66%17Estimated 64%22Estimated 66%9Estimated 58%13Estimated 66%5Estimated 55%
Counter-Strike 2291Estimated 74%165Estimated 72%204Estimated 74%116Estimated 72%159Estimated 74%62Estimated 66%79Estimated 74%22Estimated 62%
Cyberpunk 2077188Estimated 74%106Estimated 72%162Estimated 74%92Estimated 72%115Estimated 74%45Estimated 66%53Estimated 74%15Estimated 62%
Forza Horizon 5237Estimated 80%134Estimated 78%153Estimated 74%87Estimated 72%143Estimated 74%56Estimated 66%116Estimated 74%33Estimated 62%
God of War Ragnarök35Estimated 66%20Estimated 64%29Estimated 66%17Estimated 64%22Estimated 66%9Estimated 58%13Estimated 66%5Estimated 55%
Hogwarts Legacy153Estimated 74%87Estimated 72%128Estimated 74%73Estimated 72%103Estimated 74%41Estimated 66%54Estimated 74%15Estimated 62%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 202435Estimated 66%20Estimated 64%29Estimated 66%17Estimated 64%22Estimated 66%9Estimated 58%13Estimated 66%5Estimated 55%
Monster Hunter Wilds35Estimated 66%20Estimated 64%29Estimated 66%17Estimated 64%22Estimated 66%9Estimated 58%13Estimated 66%5Estimated 55%
Starfield35Estimated 66%20Estimated 64%29Estimated 66%17Estimated 64%22Estimated 66%9Estimated 58%13Estimated 66%5Estimated 55%
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares RTX 3090 Ti and Arc A310 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100713373%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100744255%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100794163%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1001006050%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1005310061%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares RTX 3090 Ti and Arc A310 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100844560%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100834461%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100794163%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100874858%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100804164%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares RTX 3090 Ti and Arc A310 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingDLSS 2XeSS
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.6OpenCL 3.0
Architecture and release
The Architecture and release section compares RTX 3090 Ti and Arc A310 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
ArchitectureAmpereXe-HPG
Process node8 nm6 nmBetter
Release date20222022
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
The Core layout and clocks section compares RTX 3090 Ti and Arc A310 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Transistor count28300 millionBetter7200 million
Die size628 mm²157 mm²Better
Shader units / cores10752Better768
Base clock1560 MHz1750 MHzBetter
Boost clock1860 MHz2000 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
The Form factor and compatibility section compares RTX 3090 Ti and Arc A310 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 4x8
Length336 mmVaries by board
ThicknessTriple-slotSingle-slot
Recommended PSU850 W200 WBetter
Power connector16 pinNone
Display outputs and limits
The Display outputs section compares RTX 3090 Ti and Arc A310 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
HDMI1x HDMI 2.1HDMI 2.1
DisplayPort3x DisplayPort 1.4a4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares RTX 3090 Ti and Arc A310 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
VRAM24 GB GDDR6XBetter4 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6XGDDR6
Memory bus384 bitBetter64 bit
TFLOPS40Better2.688
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxxAMDReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RTX 3090 Ti or Arc A310?+
RTX 3090 Ti has the higher overall gaming score, while Arc A310 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 3090 Ti is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 3090 Ti is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RTX 3090 Ti offers more overall performance, while RTX 3090 Ti offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 3090 Ti is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Arc A310 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RTX 3090 Ti leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 3090 Ti can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RTX 3090 Ti is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Arc A310 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Arc A310 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RTX 3090 Ti if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.