GeForce RTX 4060VSIntel Arc A750
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERIntel Arc A750+11%Better gaming performance
NVIDIA
RTX 4060
VSWINNERArc A75010%Better gaming performance
Intel
Arc A750
Performance4651
Efficiency10076
Price / performance100100
Data confidence6969
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
GeForce RTX 4060 vs Intel Arc A750: key takeaway
The comparison of RTX 4060 and Arc A750 shows a 11% advantage for Arc A750 in gaming performance, while RTX 4060 may still be stronger in value for money. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIAIntelPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
4651
10076
100100
6868
COMPARISON RESULT
RTX 4060 is the best overall choice
RTX 4060 leads in combined game performance. RTX 4060 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
RTX 4060 leads in the combined performance index
Arc A750 costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 38–43of 61
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce RTX 4060
0 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Intel Arc A750
100/100 · Price $289The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares RTX 4060 and Arc A750 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
46
51Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
40
43Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
37
41Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
76
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
67Better
65
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares RTX 4060 and Arc A750 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DisplayPort3x DisplayPort 1.4a3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI1x HDMI 2.11x HDMI 2.1
Device classDesktopDesktop
UpscalingDLSS 3XeSS
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
USB Type-CNoNo
Power consumption115 WBetter225 W
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS15.1117.2Better
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Power connector8 pin6+8 pin
Release date20232022
ArchitectureAda LovelaceXe-HPG
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.9OpenCL 3.0
Launch price$299$289Better
Shader units / cores30723584Better
Clock speed1830 - 2460 MHz2050 - 2400 MHzBetter
Base clock1830 MHz2050 MHzBetter
Boost clock2460 MHzBetter2400 MHz
VRAM8 GB GDDR68 GB GDDR6
Memory frequency17 GHzBetter16 GHz
Memory bus128 bit256 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth272 GB/s512 GB/sBetter
InterfacePCIe 4x8PCIe 4x16
Power consumption115 WBetter225 W
Process node5 nmBetter6 nm
Recommended PSU300 WBetter550 W
Length240 mmVaries by board
Die size159 mm²Better406 mm²
Memory cacheL1 128 KB, L2 24 MBL2 16 MBBetter
Transistor count18900 million21700 millionBetter
GAME TEST BENCH
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RTX 4060 and Arc A750 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RTX 4060Arc A750
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong
1080p High
26 FPSEstimated 66%
26 FPSEstimated 66%
1080p Ultra
22 FPSEstimated 66%
22 FPSEstimated 66%
1440p Ultra
15 FPSEstimated 64%
17 FPSEstimated 66%
4K Ultra
5 FPSEstimated 56%
8 FPSEstimated 61%
Black Myth: Wukong26Estimated 66%26Estimated 66%22Estimated 66%22Estimated 66%15Estimated 64%17Estimated 66%5Estimated 56%8Estimated 61%
Call of Duty: Warzone26Estimated 66%26Estimated 66%22Estimated 66%22Estimated 66%15Estimated 64%17Estimated 66%5Estimated 56%8Estimated 61%
Counter-Strike 2216Estimated 74%221Estimated 74%152Estimated 74%156Estimated 74%107Estimated 72%121Estimated 74%32Estimated 64%47Estimated 69%
Cyberpunk 2077139Estimated 74%143Estimated 74%120Estimated 74%123Estimated 74%78Estimated 72%88Estimated 74%21Estimated 64%32Estimated 69%
Forza Horizon 5176Estimated 80%180Estimated 80%114Estimated 74%117Estimated 74%97Estimated 72%109Estimated 74%46Estimated 64%69Estimated 69%
God of War Ragnarök26Estimated 66%26Estimated 66%22Estimated 66%22Estimated 66%15Estimated 64%17Estimated 66%5Estimated 56%8Estimated 61%
Hogwarts Legacy114Estimated 74%117Estimated 74%95Estimated 74%98Estimated 74%70Estimated 72%79Estimated 74%22Estimated 64%32Estimated 69%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 202426Estimated 66%26Estimated 66%22Estimated 66%22Estimated 66%15Estimated 64%17Estimated 66%5Estimated 56%8Estimated 61%
Monster Hunter Wilds26Estimated 66%26Estimated 66%22Estimated 66%22Estimated 66%15Estimated 64%17Estimated 66%5Estimated 56%8Estimated 61%
Starfield26Estimated 66%26Estimated 66%22Estimated 66%22Estimated 66%15Estimated 64%17Estimated 66%5Estimated 56%8Estimated 61%
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares RTX 4060 and Arc A750 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100465110%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10055585%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10052567%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10068680%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001007627%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares RTX 4060 and Arc A750 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10056595%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10055585%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10052567%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10058603%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10053566%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares RTX 4060 and Arc A750 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingDLSS 3XeSS
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.9OpenCL 3.0
Architecture and release
The Architecture and release section compares RTX 4060 and Arc A750 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
ArchitectureAda LovelaceXe-HPG
Process node5 nmBetter6 nm
Release date20232022
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
The Core layout and clocks section compares RTX 4060 and Arc A750 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Transistor count18900 million21700 millionBetter
Die size159 mm²Better406 mm²
Shader units / cores30723584Better
Base clock1830 MHz2050 MHzBetter
Boost clock2460 MHzBetter2400 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
The Form factor and compatibility section compares RTX 4060 and Arc A750 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
InterfacePCIe 4x8PCIe 4x16
Length240 mmVaries by board
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU300 WBetter550 W
Power connector8 pin6+8 pin
Display outputs and limits
The Display outputs section compares RTX 4060 and Arc A750 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
HDMI1x HDMI 2.11x HDMI 2.1
DisplayPort3x DisplayPort 1.4a3x DisplayPort 2.0
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares RTX 4060 and Arc A750 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
VRAM8 GB GDDR68 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus128 bit256 bitBetter
TFLOPS15.1117.2Better
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxxAMDReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RTX 4060 or Arc A750?+
RTX 4060 has the higher overall gaming score, while RTX 4060 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 4060 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 4060 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RTX 4060 offers more overall performance, while RTX 4060 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 4060 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RTX 4060 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RTX 4060 leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 4060 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RTX 4060 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RTX 4060 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RTX 4060 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RTX 4060 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.