GeForce RTX 5080VSIntel Arc A770
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERGeForce RTX 5080+38%Better gaming performance
NVIDIA
RTX 5080
VSWINNERRTX 508032%Better gaming performance
Intel
Arc A770
Performance7655
Efficiency6381
Price / performance66100
Data confidence6969
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
GeForce RTX 5080 vs Intel Arc A770: key takeaway
The comparison of RTX 5080 and Arc A770 shows a 38% advantage for RTX 5080 in gaming performance, while Arc A770 may still be stronger in value for money. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIAIntelPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
7655
6381
66100
8888
COMPARISON RESULT
RTX 5080 is the best overall choice
RTX 5080 leads in combined game performance. Arc A770 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
RTX 5080 leads in the combined performance index
Arc A770 costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 21–26of 61
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce RTX 5080
0 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Intel Arc A770
100/100 · Price $329The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares RTX 5080 and Arc A770 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
76Better
55
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
61Better
46
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
59Better
44
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
63
81Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
72Better
69
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares RTX 5080 and Arc A770 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
HDMI1x HDMI 2.1b1x HDMI 2.1
DisplayPort3x DisplayPort 2.1b3x DisplayPort 2.0
Device classDesktopDesktop
UpscalingDLSS 4XeSS
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS56.28Better19.66
Power consumption400 W225 WBetter
Memory typeGDDR7GDDR6
Power connector16 pin8+8 pin
Release date20252022
ArchitectureBlackwell 2.0Xe-HPG
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 12.0OpenCL 3.0
Launch price$999$329Better
Shader units / cores10752Better4096
Length304 mmVaries by board
Clock speed2295 - 2617 MHzBetter2100 - 2400 MHz
Base clock2295 MHzBetter2100 MHz
Boost clock2617 MHzBetter2400 MHz
VRAM16 GB GDDR716 GB GDDR6
Memory frequency30 GHzBetter16 GHz
Memory bus256 bit256 bit
Memory bandwidth960 GB/sBetter512 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 5x16PCIe 4x16
Power consumption400 W225 WBetter
Process node4 nmBetter6 nm
Recommended PSU750 W550 WBetter
Die size378 mm²Better406 mm²
Memory cacheL1 128 KB, L2 64 MBL2 16 MBBetter
Transistor count45600 millionBetter21700 million
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
USB Type-CNoNo
GAME TEST BENCH
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RTX 5080 and Arc A770 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RTX 5080Arc A770
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong
1080p High
38 FPSEstimated 66%
27 FPSEstimated 66%
1080p Ultra
32 FPSEstimated 66%
23 FPSEstimated 66%
1440p Ultra
24 FPSEstimated 66%
17 FPSEstimated 66%
4K Ultra
14 FPSEstimated 66%
10 FPSEstimated 66%
Black Myth: Wukong38Estimated 66%27Estimated 66%32Estimated 66%23Estimated 66%24Estimated 66%17Estimated 66%14Estimated 66%10Estimated 66%
Call of Duty: Warzone38Estimated 66%27Estimated 66%32Estimated 66%23Estimated 66%24Estimated 66%17Estimated 66%14Estimated 66%10Estimated 66%
Counter-Strike 2316Estimated 74%228Estimated 74%222Estimated 74%160Estimated 74%173Estimated 74%125Estimated 74%86Estimated 74%62Estimated 74%
Cyberpunk 2077204Estimated 74%147Estimated 74%176Estimated 74%127Estimated 74%125Estimated 74%90Estimated 74%58Estimated 74%42Estimated 74%
Forza Horizon 5234Estimated 80%186Estimated 80%167Estimated 74%120Estimated 74%155Estimated 74%112Estimated 74%126Estimated 74%91Estimated 74%
God of War Ragnarök38Estimated 66%27Estimated 66%32Estimated 66%23Estimated 66%24Estimated 66%17Estimated 66%14Estimated 66%10Estimated 66%
Hogwarts Legacy167Estimated 74%120Estimated 74%139Estimated 74%101Estimated 74%112Estimated 74%81Estimated 74%59Estimated 74%42Estimated 74%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 202438Estimated 66%27Estimated 66%32Estimated 66%23Estimated 66%24Estimated 66%17Estimated 66%14Estimated 66%10Estimated 66%
Monster Hunter Wilds38Estimated 66%27Estimated 66%32Estimated 66%23Estimated 66%24Estimated 66%17Estimated 66%14Estimated 66%10Estimated 66%
Starfield38Estimated 66%27Estimated 66%32Estimated 66%23Estimated 66%24Estimated 66%17Estimated 66%14Estimated 66%10Estimated 66%
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares RTX 5080 and Arc A770 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100765532%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100796421%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100796421%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10088880%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100638125%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares RTX 5080 and Arc A770 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100817015%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100816817%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100796421%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100837313%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100806521%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares RTX 5080 and Arc A770 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingDLSS 4XeSS
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 12.0OpenCL 3.0
Architecture and release
The Architecture and release section compares RTX 5080 and Arc A770 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
ArchitectureBlackwell 2.0Xe-HPG
Process node4 nmBetter6 nm
Release date20252022
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
The Core layout and clocks section compares RTX 5080 and Arc A770 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Transistor count45600 millionBetter21700 million
Die size378 mm²Better406 mm²
Shader units / cores10752Better4096
Base clock2295 MHzBetter2100 MHz
Boost clock2617 MHzBetter2400 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
The Form factor and compatibility section compares RTX 5080 and Arc A770 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
InterfacePCIe 5x16PCIe 4x16
Length304 mmVaries by board
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU750 W550 WBetter
Power connector16 pin8+8 pin
Display outputs and limits
The Display outputs section compares RTX 5080 and Arc A770 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
HDMI1x HDMI 2.1b1x HDMI 2.1
DisplayPort3x DisplayPort 2.1b3x DisplayPort 2.0
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares RTX 5080 and Arc A770 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
VRAM16 GB GDDR716 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR7GDDR6
Memory bus256 bit256 bit
TFLOPS56.28Better19.66
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxxAMDReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RTX 5080 or Arc A770?+
RTX 5080 has the higher overall gaming score, while Arc A770 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 5080 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 5080 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RTX 5080 offers more overall performance, while RTX 5080 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 5080 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Arc A770 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RTX 5080 leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 5080 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RTX 5080 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Arc A770 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Arc A770 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RTX 5080 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.