Radeon RX 6750 XTVSRadeon RX 7400
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERRadeon RX 6750 XT+25%Better gaming performance
AMD
RX 6750 XT
VSWINNERRX 6750 XT22%Better gaming performance
AMD
RX 7400
Performance5040
Efficiency67100
Price / performance9188
Data confidence6969
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
Radeon RX 6750 XT vs Radeon RX 7400: key takeaway
The comparison of RX 6750 XT and RX 7400 shows a 25% advantage for RX 6750 XT in gaming performance, while RX 7400 may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDAMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
5040
67100
9188
8068
COMPARISON RESULT
RX 6750 XT is the best overall choice
RX 6750 XT leads in combined game performance. RX 6750 XT offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
RX 6750 XT leads in the combined performance index
RX 7400 costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 51–56of 61
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 6750 XT
0 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon RX 7400
88/100 · Price $299The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares RX 6750 XT and RX 7400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
50Better
40
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
42Better
35
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
40Better
33
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
67
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
61Better
60
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares RX 6750 XT and RX 7400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
HDMI1x HDMI 2.11x HDMI 2.1a
Device classDesktopDesktop
UpscalingFSRFSR
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
USB Type-CNoNo
DisplayPort3x DisplayPort 1.4a3x DisplayPort 2.1
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS13.31Better8
Power consumption250 W55 WBetter
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Power connector6+8 pin1x 6-pin
Release date20222025
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0RDNA 3.0Better
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 2.2
Launch price$549$299Better
Shader units / cores2560Better1792
Clock speed2150 - 2600 MHzBetter1452 - 2300 MHz
Base clock2150 MHzBetter1452 MHz
Boost clock2600 MHzBetter2300 MHz
VRAM12 GB GDDR6Better8 GB GDDR6
Memory frequency18 GHzBetter10,8 GHz
Memory bus192 bitBetter128 bit
Memory bandwidth432 GB/sBetter173 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 4x8
Power consumption250 W55 WBetter
Process node7 nm6 nmBetter
Recommended PSU600 W200 WBetter
Length267 mmVaries by board
Die size335 mm²204 mm²Better
Memory cacheL1 128 KB, L2 3 MBL1 128 KB, L2 2 MB
Transistor count17200 millionBetter13300 million
Max monitors44
GAME TEST BENCH
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RX 6750 XT and RX 7400 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RX 6750 XTRX 7400
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong
1080p High
25 FPSEstimated 66%
23 FPSEstimated 66%
1080p Ultra
21 FPSEstimated 66%
20 FPSEstimated 66%
1440p Ultra
16 FPSEstimated 66%
12 FPSEstimated 61%
4K Ultra
8 FPSEstimated 64%
5 FPSEstimated 55%
Black Myth: Wukong25Estimated 66%23Estimated 66%21Estimated 66%20Estimated 66%16Estimated 66%12Estimated 61%8Estimated 64%5Estimated 55%
Call of Duty: Warzone25Estimated 66%23Estimated 66%21Estimated 66%20Estimated 66%16Estimated 66%12Estimated 61%8Estimated 64%5Estimated 55%
Counter-Strike 2211Estimated 74%197Estimated 74%149Estimated 74%139Estimated 74%116Estimated 74%85Estimated 69%51Estimated 72%27Estimated 63%
Cyberpunk 2077136Estimated 74%127Estimated 74%118Estimated 74%110Estimated 74%84Estimated 74%62Estimated 69%34Estimated 72%18Estimated 63%
Forza Horizon 5172Estimated 80%161Estimated 80%111Estimated 74%104Estimated 74%104Estimated 74%77Estimated 69%76Estimated 72%40Estimated 63%
God of War Ragnarök25Estimated 66%23Estimated 66%21Estimated 66%20Estimated 66%16Estimated 66%12Estimated 61%8Estimated 64%5Estimated 55%
Hogwarts Legacy111Estimated 74%104Estimated 74%93Estimated 74%87Estimated 74%75Estimated 74%55Estimated 69%35Estimated 72%18Estimated 63%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 202425Estimated 66%23Estimated 66%21Estimated 66%20Estimated 66%16Estimated 66%12Estimated 61%8Estimated 64%5Estimated 55%
Monster Hunter Wilds25Estimated 66%23Estimated 66%21Estimated 66%20Estimated 66%16Estimated 66%12Estimated 61%8Estimated 64%5Estimated 55%
Starfield25Estimated 66%23Estimated 66%21Estimated 66%20Estimated 66%16Estimated 66%12Estimated 61%8Estimated 64%5Estimated 55%
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares RX 6750 XT and RX 7400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100504022%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100605018%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100584819%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100806816%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1006710040%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares RX 6750 XT and RX 7400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100635317%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100625119%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100584819%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100665616%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100594821%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares RX 6750 XT and RX 7400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingFSRFSR
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 2.2
Architecture and release
The Architecture and release section compares RX 6750 XT and RX 7400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0RDNA 3.0Better
Process node7 nm6 nmBetter
Release date20222025
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
The Core layout and clocks section compares RX 6750 XT and RX 7400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Transistor count17200 millionBetter13300 million
Die size335 mm²204 mm²Better
Shader units / cores2560Better1792
Base clock2150 MHzBetter1452 MHz
Boost clock2600 MHzBetter2300 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
The Form factor and compatibility section compares RX 6750 XT and RX 7400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 4x8
Length267 mmVaries by board
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU600 W200 WBetter
Power connector6+8 pin1x 6-pin
Display outputs and limits
The Display outputs section compares RX 6750 XT and RX 7400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
HDMI1x HDMI 2.11x HDMI 2.1a
DisplayPort3x DisplayPort 1.4a3x DisplayPort 2.1
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares RX 6750 XT and RX 7400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
VRAM12 GB GDDR6Better8 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus192 bitBetter128 bit
TFLOPS13.31Better8
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
Arc A310Intel
GTX 1630NVIDIAReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 6750 XT or RX 7400?+
RX 6750 XT has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 6750 XT offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RX 6750 XT is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RX 6750 XT is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 6750 XT offers more overall performance, while RX 6750 XT offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RX 6750 XT is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RX 6750 XT is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 6750 XT leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 6750 XT can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 6750 XT is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RX 7400 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RX 7400 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 6750 XT if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.