
Radeon RX 7800 XTVSRadeon RX 7900 XT
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
AMD
RX 7800 XT

VSWINNERRX 7900 XT10%Better gaming performance
AMD
RX 7900 XT

Performance6673
Efficiency8477
Price / performance10086
Data confidence6969
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
Radeon RX 7800 XT vs Radeon RX 7900 XT: key takeaway
The comparison of RX 7800 XT and RX 7900 XT shows a 11% advantage for RX 7900 XT in gaming performance, while RX 7800 XT may still be stronger in value for money. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMD
AMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
6673
8477
10086
8895
COMPARISON RESULT
The devices received the same overall score
RX 7800 XT leads in combined game performance. RX 7800 XT offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Performance is nearly identical
RX 7800 XT costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 6–11of 61
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 7800 XT
0 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon RX 7800 XT
100/100 · Price $499The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares RX 7800 XT and RX 7900 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
66
73Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
54
59Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
52
57Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
84Better
77
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
76
76
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares RX 7800 XT and RX 7900 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DisplayPort3x DisplayPort 2.12x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI1x HDMI 2.1a1x HDMI 2.1a
Device classDesktopDesktop
UpscalingFSRFSR
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
USB Type-CNoYes
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS37.3251.48Better
Power consumption263 WBetter315 W
Launch price$499Better$899
Shader units / cores38405376Better
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Power connector8+8 pin8+8 pin
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Release date20232022
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0RDNA 3.0
Compute APIOpenCL 2.2OpenCL 2.2
VRAM16 GB GDDR620 GB GDDR6Better
Clock speed1295 - 2430 MHz1500 - 2400 MHzBetter
Power consumption263 WBetter315 W
Die size346 mm²Better529 mm²
Base clock1295 MHz1500 MHzBetter
Boost clock2430 MHzBetter2400 MHz
Length267 mmBetter276 mm
Memory bus256 bit320 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth621 GB/s800 GB/sBetter
Memory cacheL1 128 KB, L2 4 MBL1 250 KB, L2 6 MB
Memory frequency19,4 GHz20 GHzBetter
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 4x16
Process node5 nm5 nm
Recommended PSU600 WBetter700 W
Transistor count28100 million57700 millionBetter
GAME TEST BENCH
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RX 7800 XT and RX 7900 XT across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RX 7800 XTRX 7900 XT
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted

Black Myth: Wukong
1080p High
32 FPSEstimated 66%
36 FPSEstimated 66%
1080p Ultra
27 FPSEstimated 66%
31 FPSEstimated 66%
1440p Ultra
21 FPSEstimated 66%
23 FPSEstimated 66%
4K Ultra
12 FPSEstimated 66%
13 FPSEstimated 66%
Black Myth: Wukong32Estimated 66%36Estimated 66%27Estimated 66%31Estimated 66%21Estimated 66%23Estimated 66%12Estimated 66%13Estimated 66%
Call of Duty: Warzone32Estimated 66%36Estimated 66%27Estimated 66%31Estimated 66%21Estimated 66%23Estimated 66%12Estimated 66%13Estimated 66%
Counter-Strike 2271Estimated 74%305Estimated 74%190Estimated 74%214Estimated 74%148Estimated 74%166Estimated 74%73Estimated 74%83Estimated 74%
Cyberpunk 2077175Estimated 74%197Estimated 74%150Estimated 74%169Estimated 74%107Estimated 74%121Estimated 74%49Estimated 74%55Estimated 74%
Forza Horizon 5220Estimated 80%226Estimated 80%143Estimated 74%161Estimated 74%133Estimated 74%150Estimated 74%108Estimated 74%122Estimated 74%
God of War Ragnarök32Estimated 66%36Estimated 66%27Estimated 66%31Estimated 66%21Estimated 66%23Estimated 66%12Estimated 66%13Estimated 66%
Hogwarts Legacy143Estimated 74%161Estimated 74%119Estimated 74%134Estimated 74%96Estimated 74%108Estimated 74%50Estimated 74%56Estimated 74%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 202432Estimated 66%36Estimated 66%27Estimated 66%31Estimated 66%21Estimated 66%23Estimated 66%12Estimated 66%13Estimated 66%
Monster Hunter Wilds32Estimated 66%36Estimated 66%27Estimated 66%31Estimated 66%21Estimated 66%23Estimated 66%12Estimated 66%13Estimated 66%
Starfield32Estimated 66%36Estimated 66%27Estimated 66%31Estimated 66%21Estimated 66%23Estimated 66%12Estimated 66%13Estimated 66%
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares RX 7800 XT and RX 7900 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100667310%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10072777%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10072799%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10088958%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 10084779%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares RX 7800 XT and RX 7900 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10076839%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10075829%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10072799%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10078859%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10073798%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares RX 7800 XT and RX 7900 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingFSRFSR
Compute APIOpenCL 2.2OpenCL 2.2
Architecture and release
The Architecture and release section compares RX 7800 XT and RX 7900 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0RDNA 3.0
Process node5 nm5 nm
Release date20232022
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
The Core layout and clocks section compares RX 7800 XT and RX 7900 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Transistor count28100 million57700 millionBetter
Die size346 mm²Better529 mm²
Shader units / cores38405376Better
Base clock1295 MHz1500 MHzBetter
Boost clock2430 MHzBetter2400 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
The Form factor and compatibility section compares RX 7800 XT and RX 7900 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 4x16
Length267 mmBetter276 mm
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU600 WBetter700 W
Power connector8+8 pin8+8 pin
Display outputs and limits
The Display outputs section compares RX 7800 XT and RX 7900 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
HDMI1x HDMI 2.1a1x HDMI 2.1a
DisplayPort3x DisplayPort 2.12x DisplayPort 2.1
USB Type-CNoYes
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares RX 7800 XT and RX 7900 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
VRAM16 GB GDDR620 GB GDDR6Better
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus256 bit320 bitBetter
TFLOPS37.3251.48Better
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 7800 XT or RX 7900 XT?+
RX 7800 XT has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 7800 XT offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RX 7800 XT is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RX 7800 XT is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 7800 XT offers more overall performance, while RX 7800 XT offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RX 7800 XT is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RX 7800 XT is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 7800 XT leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 7800 XT can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 7800 XT is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RX 7800 XT is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RX 7800 XT is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 7800 XT if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.

Arc A310Intel
GTX 1630NVIDIA