Radeon RX 7900 GREVSIntel Arc A380
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERRadeon RX 7900 GRE+94%Better gaming performance
AMD
RX 7900 GRE
VSWINNERRX 7900 GRE64%Better gaming performance
Intel
Arc A380
Performance7036
Efficiency90100
Price / performance99100
Data confidence6969
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
Radeon RX 7900 GRE vs Intel Arc A380: key takeaway
The comparison of RX 7900 GRE and Arc A380 shows a 94% advantage for RX 7900 GRE in gaming performance, while Arc A380 may still be stronger in value for money. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDIntelPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
7036
90100
99100
8860
COMPARISON RESULT
RX 7900 GRE is the best overall choice
RX 7900 GRE leads in combined game performance. Arc A380 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
RX 7900 GRE leads in the combined performance index
Arc A380 costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 4–9of 61
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 7900 GRE
0 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Intel Arc A380
100/100 · Price $139The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares RX 7900 GRE and Arc A380 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
70Better
36
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
57Better
32
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
54Better
30
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
90
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
79Better
60
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares RX 7900 GRE and Arc A380 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DisplayPort2x DisplayPort 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI1x HDMI 2.1a1x HDMI 2.1
Device classDesktopDesktop
UpscalingFSRXeSS
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
USB Type-CYesNo
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS45.98Better4.198
Power consumption260 W75 WBetter
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Power connector8+8 pin6 pin
Release date20232022
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0Xe-HPG
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Compute APIOpenCL 2.2OpenCL 3.0
Launch price$549$139Better
Shader units / cores5120Better1024
Clock speed1500 - 2245 MHzBetter300 - 2000 MHz
Base clock1500 MHzBetter300 MHz
Boost clock2245 MHzBetter2000 MHz
VRAM16 GB GDDR6Better6 GB GDDR6
Memory frequency18 GHzBetter15,5 GHz
Memory bus256 bitBetter96 bit
Memory bandwidth576 GB/sBetter186 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 4x8
Power consumption260 W75 WBetter
Process node5 nmBetter6 nm
Recommended PSU600 W250 WBetter
Length276 mm222 mmBetter
Die size529 mm²157 mm²Better
Memory cacheL1 250 KB, L2 6 MBL2 4 MBBetter
Transistor count57700 millionBetter7200 million
GAME TEST BENCH
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RX 7900 GRE and Arc A380 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RX 7900 GREArc A380
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong
1080p High
34 FPSEstimated 66%
22 FPSEstimated 66%
1080p Ultra
29 FPSEstimated 66%
19 FPSEstimated 66%
1440p Ultra
22 FPSEstimated 66%
10 FPSEstimated 59%
4K Ultra
13 FPSEstimated 66%
5 FPSEstimated 55%
Black Myth: Wukong34Estimated 66%22Estimated 66%29Estimated 66%19Estimated 66%22Estimated 66%10Estimated 59%13Estimated 66%5Estimated 55%
Call of Duty: Warzone34Estimated 66%22Estimated 66%29Estimated 66%19Estimated 66%22Estimated 66%10Estimated 59%13Estimated 66%5Estimated 55%
Counter-Strike 2289Estimated 74%188Estimated 74%203Estimated 74%129Estimated 74%158Estimated 74%69Estimated 67%79Estimated 74%23Estimated 62%
Cyberpunk 2077187Estimated 74%121Estimated 74%161Estimated 74%102Estimated 74%115Estimated 74%50Estimated 67%53Estimated 74%15Estimated 62%
Forza Horizon 5236Estimated 80%153Estimated 80%153Estimated 74%97Estimated 74%142Estimated 74%62Estimated 67%116Estimated 74%34Estimated 62%
God of War Ragnarök34Estimated 66%22Estimated 66%29Estimated 66%19Estimated 66%22Estimated 66%10Estimated 59%13Estimated 66%5Estimated 55%
Hogwarts Legacy153Estimated 74%99Estimated 74%128Estimated 74%81Estimated 74%103Estimated 74%45Estimated 67%54Estimated 74%16Estimated 62%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 202434Estimated 66%22Estimated 66%29Estimated 66%19Estimated 66%22Estimated 66%10Estimated 59%13Estimated 66%5Estimated 55%
Monster Hunter Wilds34Estimated 66%22Estimated 66%29Estimated 66%19Estimated 66%22Estimated 66%10Estimated 59%13Estimated 66%5Estimated 55%
Starfield34Estimated 66%22Estimated 66%29Estimated 66%19Estimated 66%22Estimated 66%10Estimated 59%13Estimated 66%5Estimated 55%
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares RX 7900 GRE and Arc A380 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100703664%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100734450%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100754354%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100886038%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1009010011%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares RX 7900 GRE and Arc A380 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100784750%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100774650%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100754354%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100804948%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100754354%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares RX 7900 GRE and Arc A380 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingFSRXeSS
Compute APIOpenCL 2.2OpenCL 3.0
Architecture and release
The Architecture and release section compares RX 7900 GRE and Arc A380 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0Xe-HPG
Process node5 nmBetter6 nm
Release date20232022
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
The Core layout and clocks section compares RX 7900 GRE and Arc A380 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Transistor count57700 millionBetter7200 million
Die size529 mm²157 mm²Better
Shader units / cores5120Better1024
Base clock1500 MHzBetter300 MHz
Boost clock2245 MHzBetter2000 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
The Form factor and compatibility section compares RX 7900 GRE and Arc A380 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 4x8
Length276 mm222 mmBetter
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU600 W250 WBetter
Power connector8+8 pin6 pin
Display outputs and limits
The Display outputs section compares RX 7900 GRE and Arc A380 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
HDMI1x HDMI 2.1a1x HDMI 2.1
DisplayPort2x DisplayPort 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
USB Type-CYesNo
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares RX 7900 GRE and Arc A380 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
VRAM16 GB GDDR6Better6 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus256 bitBetter96 bit
TFLOPS45.98Better4.198
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
GTX 1630NVIDIAReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 7900 GRE or Arc A380?+
RX 7900 GRE has the higher overall gaming score, while Arc A380 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RX 7900 GRE is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RX 7900 GRE is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 7900 GRE offers more overall performance, while RX 7900 GRE offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RX 7900 GRE is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Arc A380 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 7900 GRE leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 7900 GRE can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 7900 GRE is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Arc A380 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Arc A380 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 7900 GRE if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.