Radeon RX 5500VSRadeon RX 5700 XT
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERRadeon RX 5500+1%Better overall performance
AMD
RX 5500
VSWINNERRX 55000%H2H overall index
AMD
RX 5700 XT
Rendimiento4046
Eficiencia8968
Price / Performance100100
Data confidence7575
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDAMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
4046
8968
100100
6068
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→Hardware used by streamers
Real public setups linked to each device.
AMDRX 55000No verified public setup yet
AMDRX 5700 XT0No verified public setup yet
RESULTADO DE LA COMPARACIÓN
The devices received the same overall score
RX 5500 leads in combined gaming performance. RX 5500 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Performance is nearly identical
RX 5500 costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 107–112of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 5500
0 Me gustaHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon RX 5500
100/100 · Price $229The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
PUNTUACIÓN GENERAL
Resumen
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
40
46Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
32
40Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
33
37Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
89Better
68
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
61
61
COMPARACIÓN COMPLETA
Especificaciones
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Clock speed1500 - 1845 MHz1605 - 1755 MHzBetter
Base clock1500 MHz1605 MHzBetter
Boost clock1845 MHzBetter1755 MHz
VRAM4 GB GDDR68 GB GDDR6Better
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
VRAM capacity4 GB8 GBBetter
Frecuencia de memoria14 GHz14 GHz
Memory bus128 bit256 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth224 GB/s448 GB/sBetter
InterfacePCIe 4x8PCIe 4x16
Power connector8 pinBetter6+8 pin
Power consumption150 WBetter225 W
TDP150 WBetter225 W
Process node7 nm7 nm
Release date20192019
Architecture——
Recommended PSU——
Length——
Thickness——
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
TFLOPS5.1969.754Better
Launch price——
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Memory cache——
FPS en juegos
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100404614%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100465110%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100465212%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100606813%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100896827%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100495613%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100485514%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100465212%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100515813%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100465314%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
Información básica
Architecture——
Process node7 nm7 nm
Release date20192019
Launch price——
Especificaciones detalladas
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Base clock1500 MHz1605 MHzMejor
Boost clock1845 MHzMejor1755 MHz
Formato y compatibilidad
InterfacePCIe 4x8PCIe 4x16
Length——
Thickness——
Recommended PSU——
Power connector8 pinMejor6+8 pin
Capacidad y tipo de VRAM
VRAM4 GB GDDR68 GB GDDR6Mejor
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus128 bit256 bitMejor
Memory bandwidth224 GB/s448 GB/sMejor
Memory cache——
Conectividad y salidas
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
Compatibilidad con API y SDK
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Otras comparaciones
205NVIDIAReseñas y preguntas
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Preguntas frecuentes sobre la comparación
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 5500 or RX 5700 XT?+
RX 5500 has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 5500 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RX 5500 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RX 5500 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 5500 offers more overall performance, while RX 5700 XT offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RX 5700 XT is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RX 5500 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 5500 leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 5700 XT can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 5500 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RX 5500 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RX 5500 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 5500 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.