Intel Core 9 273PQEVSIntel Core i7-11700
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERIntel Core 9 273PQE+1%Better overall performance
Intel
Core 9 273PQE
VSWINNERCore 9 273PQE0%H2H overall index
Intel
Core i7-11700
Hiệu năng6044
Hiệu quả3085
Data confidence6262
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
IntelIntelPerformance
Single-core
Multi-core
L3 cache
Efficiency
6044
9882
5940
10
3085
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→Hardware used by streamers
Real public setups linked to each device.
IntelCore 9 273PQE0No verified public setup yet
IntelCore i7-117000No verified public setup yet
KẾT QUẢ SO SÁNH
The devices received the same overall score
Core 9 273PQE leads in overall performance, while Core 9 273PQE offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.
Performance is nearly identical
Prices are identical
ĐIỂM TỔNG
Tổng quan
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
60Better
44
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
50Better
38
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
47Better
36
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
30
85Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
53
53
SO SÁNH ĐẦY ĐỦ
Thông số
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
PassMark46107Better19927
Nhân / luồng12P / 24Better8 / 16
Clock speedP 3,4 - 5,9 GHzBetter2,5 - 4,9 GHz
Base clock3400 MHzBetter2500 MHz
Boost clock5900 MHzBetter4900 MHz
Кэш24+36 MBBetter16 MB
Кэш L336 MBBetter16 MB
SocketLGA1700BetterLGA1200
Встроенная графикаUHD 770 1,65 GHzBetterUHD 750 1,3 GHz
PBP / MTP125 / 253 WBetter65 W
Power consumption125 / 253 W65 WBetter
Поддержка памятиDDR5-5600 / DDR4-3200BetterDDR4-3200
Process node10 nm (Intel 7)Better14 nm
ArchitectureBartlett LakeRocket Lake
Кодовое имяBartlett LakeRocket Lake
Release date——
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 100988218%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100594038%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 100624630%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100473238%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 100423130%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 100473432%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 100352630%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 100483531%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 100453331%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Câu hỏi thường gặp về so sánh
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Core 9 273PQE or Core i7-11700?+
Core 9 273PQE has the higher overall gaming score, while Core 9 273PQE offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Core 9 273PQE is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Core 9 273PQE is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Core 9 273PQE offers more overall performance, while Core 9 273PQE offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Core 9 273PQE is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Core 9 273PQE is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Core 9 273PQE leads in combined 1440p performance. Core 9 273PQE can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Core 9 273PQE is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Core i7-11700 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Core i7-11700 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Core 9 273PQE if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.