H2H

Intel Core i9-14900KSVSIntel Core 7 251TE

Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison

🎮 Tested in 0 games3 resolutions: 1080p / 1440p / 4KCurrent catalog dataTesting methodology
Intel Core i9-14900KS
♜ WINNERIntel Core i9-14900KS+1%Better overall performance
Intel Core 7 251TE
IntelCore i9-14900KS

20.353.139 ₫Average price

VS

0 ₫Average price

IntelCore 7 251TE
VS
WINNERCore i9-14900KS1%H2H overall index
Hiệu năng7768
Hiệu quả3863
Data confidence6262

Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

Core i9-14900KSIntel Core i9-14900KSIntel
Core 7 251TEIntel Core 7 251TEIntel
H2H
Performance
Single-core
Multi-core
L3 cache
Efficiency
Performance
7768
Single-core
10090
Multi-core
8776
L3 cache
11
Efficiency
3863
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA

Hardware used by streamers

Real public setups linked to each device.

Open streamer setups
Intel Core i9-14900KSIntelCore i9-14900KS0

No verified public setup yet

0verified setups
VS
Intel Core 7 251TEIntelCore 7 251TE0

No verified public setup yet

0verified setups
KẾT QUẢ SO SÁNH

Core i9-14900KS is the best overall choice

Core i9-14900KS leads in overall performance, while Core i9-14900KS offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE1%

Core i9-14900KS leads in the combined performance index

PRICE DIFFERENCE20.353.139 ₫

Core 7 251TE costs less

ĐIỂM TỔNG

Tổng quan

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

CategoryCore i9-14900KSCore 7 251TE
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
77Better
68
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
62Better
55
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
59Better
53
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
38
63Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
68Better
67
SO SÁNH ĐẦY ĐỦ

Thông số

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

SpecificationCore i9-14900KSCore 7 251TE
PassMark62010Better30022
Nhân / luồng8P+16E / 328P+16E / 32
Clock speedP 3,2 - 6,2 GHz / E 2,4 - 4,4 GHzBetterP 1,4 - 5,4 GHz / E 1 - 3,9 GHz
Base clock3200 MHzBetter1400 MHz
Boost clock6200 MHzBetter5400 MHz
Кэш32+36 MBBetter26+36 MB
Кэш L336 MB36 MB
SocketLGA1700LGA1700
Встроенная графикаUHD 770 1,65 GHzUHD 770 1,6 GHz
PBP / MTP150 / 253 WBetter45 / 135 W
Power consumption150 / 253 W45 / 135 WBetter
Поддержка памятиDDR5-5600 / DDR4-3200DDR5-5600 / DDR4-3200
Process node10 nm (Intel 7)10 nm (Intel 7)
ArchitectureRaptor Lake RefreshBartlett Lake
Кодовое имяRaptor Lake RefreshBartlett Lake
Release date
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

IndexCore i9-14900KSCore 7 251TEDifference
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 1001009011%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100877613%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 100786912%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100706114%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

IndexCore i9-14900KSCore 7 251TEDifference
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 100544812%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 100605312%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 100454012%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 100625512%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 100585113%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ACore i9-14900KS68
Device BCore 7 251TE67
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Câu hỏi thường gặp về so sánh

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: Core i9-14900KS or Core 7 251TE?

Core i9-14900KS has the higher overall gaming score, while Core i9-14900KS offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

Core i9-14900KS is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

Core i9-14900KS is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

Core i9-14900KS offers more overall performance, while Core i9-14900KS offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

Core i9-14900KS is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

Core i9-14900KS is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

Core i9-14900KS leads in combined 1440p performance. Core i9-14900KS can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

Core i9-14900KS is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

Core 7 251TE is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

Core 7 251TE is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to Core i9-14900KS if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.