Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 vs AMD Opteron 3380

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Core 2 Duo E6550 and Opteron 3380 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Opteron 3380 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6550 by ~423% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+423%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?

H2HBench Data Quality

Low confidence
Specifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 0Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026

Limited verified data

H2HBench Verdict

Equal catalog scores

The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.

Reasons to consider Core 2 Duo E6550

No distinct advantage is established by the available data. Compare platform compatibility and your own workload.

Reasons to consider Opteron 3380

  • Higher catalog performance index
  • Higher catalog value index
  • More physical CPU cores
Low confidence

Catalog metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Single-core
Multi-core
Price / performance
L3 cache
Efficiency
Performance
13
Single-core
3960
Multi-core
424
Price / performance
911
L3 cache
2926
Efficiency
26
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

CategoryCore 2 Duo E6550Opteron 3380
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
1
3Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
7
9Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
5
6Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
2
6Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
0
0

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

SpecificationCore 2 Duo E6550Opteron 3380
PBP / MTP
SocketBetter
Architecture
Release date
Cores / ThreadsBetter
Integrated graphics
Power consumption
Process nodeBetter
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
L1 cacheBetter
L2 cacheBetter
L3 cacheBetter
Device class
PassMarkBetter
Memory support

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

IndexCore 2 Duo E6550Opteron 3380Difference
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 100396042%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100424143%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 100183564%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10092491%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 10091120%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

IndexCore 2 Duo E6550Opteron 3380Difference
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 10091011%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 1007813%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 10013130%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 1007813%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 1008912%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ACore 2 Duo E65500
Device BOpteron 33800
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

Evidence details

Data coverage

Verified gaming results
0
Verified synthetic results
0
Games with verified results
0
Verified community results
0
Estimated / unverified results
0
Specifications
0 / 31

Specification record updated:

Benchmarks updated:

Price record updated:

Comparison reviewed:

Calculated scores · How is this calculated?

Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.

clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)
Price evidence · View sources (3)

Verified community results

No verified community benchmarks yet.

Reviewed by

No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.

Comparison history

No recorded changes yet. Change tracking starts with the evidence system; earlier history has not been reconstructed.

Why you can trust this comparison

Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.

Report incorrect data

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: Core 2 Duo E6550 or Opteron 3380?

Core 2 Duo E6550 has the higher overall gaming score, while Opteron 3380 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

Core 2 Duo E6550 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

Core 2 Duo E6550 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

Core 2 Duo E6550 offers more overall performance, while Core 2 Duo E6550 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

Core 2 Duo E6550 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

Opteron 3380 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

Core 2 Duo E6550 leads in combined 1440p performance. Core 2 Duo E6550 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

Core 2 Duo E6550 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

Core 2 Duo E6550 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

Core 2 Duo E6550 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to Core 2 Duo E6550 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.