Intel
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H vs Intel Processor N95
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
Intel
Intel Processor N95
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Core Ultra X7 358H and Intel Processor N95 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Core Ultra X7 358H outperforms Intel Processor N95 by ~537% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+537%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 0Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (~600%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider Core Ultra X7 358H
- Higher catalog performance index
- More physical CPU cores
Reasons to consider Intel Processor N95
- Lower stated power consumption
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
IntelPerformance
Single-core
Multi-core
L3 cache
Efficiency
223
8057
6411
00
10025
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
22Better
3
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
22Better
9
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
20Better
6
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
25
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
35Better
5
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Architecture
Cores / ThreadsBetter
Boost clockBetter
Cache—
Integrated graphicsBetter
Device class
Release date
Release status—
Base clockBetter
Clock speedBetter
L1 cacheN/A
L2 cacheN/A
L3 cacheBetter
Memory supportBetter
PBP / MTP
Socket
PassMarkBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Process node—
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 100805734%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 1006411141%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 100592388%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100519140%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100041200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 100162156%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 100172158%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 100132147%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 100182160%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 100172158%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 0
- Specifications
- 0 / 33
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (1)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
No recorded changes yet. Change tracking starts with the evidence system; earlier history has not been reconstructed.
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Core Ultra X7 358H or Intel Processor N95?+
Core Ultra X7 358H has the higher overall gaming score, while Intel Processor N95 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Core Ultra X7 358H is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Core Ultra X7 358H is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Core Ultra X7 358H offers more overall performance, while Core Ultra X7 358H offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Core Ultra X7 358H is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Intel Processor N95 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Core Ultra X7 358H leads in combined 1440p performance. Core Ultra X7 358H can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Core Ultra X7 358H is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Core Ultra X7 358H is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Core Ultra X7 358H is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Core Ultra X7 358H if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.