AMD Ryzen 5 8400F vs Intel Celeron E1200

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Ryzen 5 8400F and Celeron E1200 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Ryzen 5 8400F outperforms Celeron E1200 by ~4662% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+4662%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?

H2HBench Data Quality

Low confidence
Specifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 0Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026

Limited verified data

H2HBench Verdict

Higher catalog score: AMD Ryzen 5 8400F (~1700%)

The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.

Reasons to consider Ryzen 5 8400F

  • Higher catalog performance index
  • Lower recorded market price
  • More physical CPU cores

Reasons to consider Celeron E1200

No distinct advantage is established by the available data. Compare platform compatibility and your own workload.

Low confidence

Catalog metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Single-core
Multi-core
L3 cache
Efficiency
Performance
150
Single-core
7827
Multi-core
293
L3 cache
029
Efficiency
290
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

CategoryRyzen 5 8400FCeleron E1200
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
15Better
0
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
17Better
6
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
15Better
4
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
29Better
0
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
17Better
0

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

SpecificationRyzen 5 8400FCeleron E1200
Release date
Device class
PassMarkBetter
PBP / MTP
Memory support
Cores / ThreadsBetter
SocketBetter
Architecture
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
L1 cacheBetter
L2 cacheBetter
L3 cacheBetter
Power consumption
Process nodeBetter
Integrated graphics

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

IndexRyzen 5 8400FCeleron E1200Difference
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 100782797%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100293163%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 100391494%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10023897%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100540200%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

IndexRyzen 5 8400FCeleron E1200Difference
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 10011920%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 10012667%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 10091229%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 10012667%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 10011744%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ARyzen 5 8400F17
Device BCeleron E12000
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

Evidence details

Data coverage

Verified gaming results
0
Verified synthetic results
0
Games with verified results
0
Verified community results
0
Estimated / unverified results
0
Specifications
0 / 32

Specification record updated:

Benchmarks updated:

Price record updated:

Comparison reviewed:

Calculated scores · How is this calculated?

Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.

clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)
Price evidence · View sources (4)

Verified community results

No verified community benchmarks yet.

Reviewed by

No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.

Comparison history

No recorded changes yet. Change tracking starts with the evidence system; earlier history has not been reconstructed.

Why you can trust this comparison

Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.

Report incorrect data

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: Ryzen 5 8400F or Celeron E1200?

Ryzen 5 8400F has the higher overall gaming score, while Ryzen 5 8400F offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

Ryzen 5 8400F is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

Ryzen 5 8400F is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

Ryzen 5 8400F offers more overall performance, while Ryzen 5 8400F offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

Ryzen 5 8400F is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

Ryzen 5 8400F is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

Ryzen 5 8400F leads in combined 1440p performance. Ryzen 5 8400F can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

Ryzen 5 8400F is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

Ryzen 5 8400F is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

Ryzen 5 8400F is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to Ryzen 5 8400F if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.