H2H

Intel Xeon W-2195 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Xeon W-2195 and Ryzen Threadripper 1900 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Xeon W-2195 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1900 by 96% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+96%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.
QUICK COMPARISON ANALYSIS

Intel Xeon W-2195 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900: key takeaway

The comparison of Xeon W-2195 and Ryzen Threadripper 1900 shows a 100% advantage for Xeon W-2195 in gaming performance, while Ryzen Threadripper 1900 may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Single-core
Multi-core
L3 cache
Efficiency
Performance
189
Single-core
7262
Multi-core
7930
L3 cache
00
Efficiency
169
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMPARISON RESULT

Xeon W-2195 is the best overall choice

Xeon W-2195 leads in overall performance, while Xeon W-2195 offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE100%

Xeon W-2195 leads in the combined performance index

PRICE DIFFERENCE$37

Ryzen Threadripper 1900 costs less

OVERALL SCORE

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

The Summary score section compares Xeon W-2195 and Ryzen Threadripper 1900 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

CategoryXeon W-2195Ryzen Threadripper 1900
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
18Better
9
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
19Better
13
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
17Better
10
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
16Better
9
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
18Better
9
FULL COMPARISON

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

The Specifications section compares Xeon W-2195 and Ryzen Threadripper 1900 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationXeon W-2195Ryzen Threadripper 1900
PassMark27985Better14282
PBP / MTP140 WBetter125 W
Clock speed2,3 - 4,3 GHz3,1 - 3,7 GHzBetter
Base clock2300 MHz3100 MHzBetter
Boost clock4300 MHzBetter3700 MHz
L1 cache64 KB per core96 KB per coreBetter
L2 cache1 MB per core512 KB per coreBetter
L3 cache24.75 MBBetter16 MB
Memory supportDDR4-2666DDR4-2666 4 channels
Cores / Threads18 / 36Better8 / 16
SocketLGA2066BetterTR4
ArchitectureSkylake-XWhitehaven
Release date2017
Integrated graphicsNoNo
Power consumption140 W125 WBetter
Process node14 nm14 nm
Device classServerDesktop
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

The Benchmarks section compares Xeon W-2195 and Ryzen Threadripper 1900 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexXeon W-2195Ryzen Threadripper 1900Difference
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 100726215%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100793090%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 100653560%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100632490%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

The Detailed comparison section compares Xeon W-2195 and Ryzen Threadripper 1900 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexXeon W-2195Ryzen Threadripper 1900Difference
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 10013674%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 10014767%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 10011575%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 10014767%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 10014767%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device AXeon W-219518
Device BRyzen Threadripper 19009
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: Xeon W-2195 or Ryzen Threadripper 1900?

Xeon W-2195 has the higher overall gaming score, while Xeon W-2195 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

Xeon W-2195 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

Xeon W-2195 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

Xeon W-2195 offers more overall performance, while Xeon W-2195 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

Xeon W-2195 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

Xeon W-2195 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

Xeon W-2195 leads in combined 1440p performance. Xeon W-2195 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

Xeon W-2195 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

Xeon W-2195 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

Xeon W-2195 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to Xeon W-2195 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.