Intel
Intel Xeon W-2295 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
Ryzen Threadripper 1900
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Xeon W-2295 and Ryzen Threadripper 1900 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Xeon W-2295 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1900 by 115% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+115%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.Intel Xeon W-2295 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900: key takeaway
The comparison of Xeon W-2295 and Ryzen Threadripper 1900 shows a 122% advantage for Xeon W-2295 in gaming performance, while Ryzen Threadripper 1900 may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
Intel
AMDPerformance
Single-core
Multi-core
L3 cache
Efficiency
209
7762
8430
00
159
COMPARISON RESULT
Xeon W-2295 is the best overall choice
Xeon W-2295 leads in overall performance, while Xeon W-2295 offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.
Xeon W-2295 leads in the combined performance index
Ryzen Threadripper 1900 costs less
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares Xeon W-2295 and Ryzen Threadripper 1900 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
20Better
9
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
21Better
13
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
18Better
10
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
15Better
9
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
19Better
9
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares Xeon W-2295 and Ryzen Threadripper 1900 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
PassMark30673Better14282
PBP / MTP165 WBetter125 W
Memory supportDDR4-2993DDR4-2666 4 channels
Cores / Threads18 / 36Better8 / 16
SocketLGA2066BetterTR4
ArchitectureCascade Lake-XWhitehaven
Release date—2017
Clock speed3 - 4,6 GHz3,1 - 3,7 GHzBetter
Base clock3000 MHz3100 MHzBetter
Boost clock4600 MHzBetter3700 MHz
L1 cache64 KB per core96 KB per coreBetter
L2 cache1 MB per core512 KB per coreBetter
L3 cache24.75 MBBetter16 MB
Integrated graphicsNoNo
Power consumption165 W125 WBetter
Process node14 nm14 nm
Device classServerDesktop
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares Xeon W-2295 and Ryzen Threadripper 1900 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 100776222%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100843095%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 100693565%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100672495%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares Xeon W-2295 and Ryzen Threadripper 1900 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 10014680%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 10016778%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 10012582%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 10016778%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 10015773%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Xeon W-2295 or Ryzen Threadripper 1900?+
Xeon W-2295 has the higher overall gaming score, while Xeon W-2295 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Xeon W-2295 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Xeon W-2295 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Xeon W-2295 offers more overall performance, while Xeon W-2295 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Xeon W-2295 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Xeon W-2295 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Xeon W-2295 leads in combined 1440p performance. Xeon W-2295 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Xeon W-2295 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Xeon W-2295 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Xeon W-2295 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Xeon W-2295 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.