AMD
Radeon 740M 8300G vs GeForce RTX 2060
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
RTX 2060
Aggregate performance score
We've compared 740M 8300G and RTX 2060 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗740M 8300G outperforms RTX 2060 by ~15% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+15%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 15, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon 740M 8300G (~8%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider 740M 8300G
- Higher catalog performance index
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 · FSR
Reasons to consider RTX 2060
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5 · DLSS 2
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMD
NVIDIAPerformance
Price / performance
4640
10069
Graphics card ranking
Positions 22–27of 411
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon 740M 8300G
179 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce RTX 2060
Price $130.00Based on catalog performance per unit of current market price, not measured FPS.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
46Better
40
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
40Better
35
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
37Better
33
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
45
83Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
52Better
48
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Device class
DirectX
Vulkan
HDMI
DisplayPort
USB Type-C
Power consumption—
OpenGL
Upscaling
Compute API
TFLOPSBetter
Clock speedBetter
VRAM
Memory type
Memory frequency—
Memory bandwidth—
Interface
Power consumption—
Release date
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
Process nodeBetter
Max monitors
Max resolution
Recommended PSU
Length
Thickness
Architecture
Launch price—
Transistor count
Die size
Shader units / cores
Memory cache
Power connector
Memory bus
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares 740M 8300G and RTX 2060 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
740M 8300GRTX 2060
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
190 FPS
192 FPS
1080p Ultra
133 FPS
135 FPS
1440p Ultra
104 FPS
92 FPS
4K Ultra
52 FPS
28 FPS
Counter-Strike 2740M 8300G190 FPSRTX 2060192 FPS740M 8300G133 FPSRTX 2060135 FPS740M 8300G104 FPSRTX 206092 FPS740M 8300G52 FPSRTX 206028 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077740M 8300G123 FPSRTX 2060124 FPS740M 8300G106 FPSRTX 2060107 FPS740M 8300G75 FPSRTX 206067 FPS740M 8300G35 FPSRTX 206019 FPS
Forza Horizon 5740M 8300G155 FPSRTX 2060156 FPS740M 8300G100 FPSRTX 2060101 FPS740M 8300G93 FPSRTX 206083 FPS740M 8300G76 FPSRTX 206042 FPS
Hogwarts Legacy740M 8300G100 FPSRTX 2060101 FPS740M 8300G84 FPSRTX 206085 FPS740M 8300G67 FPSRTX 206060 FPS740M 8300G35 FPSRTX 206019 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100464014%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100534516%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10046460%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100060200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100083200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10046496%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10046484%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10046460%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100465110%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10046460%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.31.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingFSRDLSS 2
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5
Architecture and release
ArchitectureNot publicly specifiedTuring
Process node4 nmBetter12 nm
Release date20232019
Device classMobileDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor countNot publicly specified10800 million
Die sizeNot publicly specified445 mm²
Shader units / coresNot publicly specified1920
Base clock800 MHz1365 MHzBetter
Boost clock2600 MHzBetter1680 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3x16
LengthOEM dependent229 mm
ThicknessOEM dependentDual-slot
Recommended PSUOEM dependent450 W
Power connectorIntegrated laptop power8 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIOEM dependentHDMI 2.0
DisplayPortOEM dependentDisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-COEM dependentYes
Max monitorsOEM dependent5
Max resolutionOEM dependent7680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM- SMA6 GB GDDR6
Memory typeSMAGDDR6
Memory busSystem memory interface192 bit
TFLOPS2.876.451Better
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 65
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (4)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (8)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record changed: product_prices
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: 740M 8300G or RTX 2060?+
740M 8300G has the higher overall gaming score, while 740M 8300G offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 2060 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 2060 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
740M 8300G offers more overall performance, while 740M 8300G offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 2060 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
740M 8300G is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
740M 8300G leads in combined 1440p performance. 740M 8300G can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
740M 8300G is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RTX 2060 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RTX 2060 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to 740M 8300G if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.