AMD
Radeon 740M 8300G vs Radeon RX 5500
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
RX 5500
Aggregate performance score
We've compared 740M 8300G and RX 5500 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗740M 8300G outperforms RX 5500 by ~24% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+24%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Equal catalog scores
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider 740M 8300G
- Higher catalog performance index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 · FSR
Reasons to consider RX 5500
- Lower recorded market price
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.1 · FSR
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDPerformance
Price / performance
4637
100100
Graphics card ranking
Positions 22–27of 411
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon 740M 8300G
179 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon RX 5500
Price $60.00Based on catalog performance per unit of current market price, not measured FPS.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
46Better
37
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
40Better
33
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
37Better
31
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
45
82Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
52
52
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Device class
DirectX
Vulkan
HDMI
DisplayPort
USB Type-C
Power consumption—
OpenGL
Upscaling
Compute API
TFLOPSBetter
Clock speedBetter
VRAM
Memory type
Memory frequency—
Memory bandwidth—
Interface
Power consumption—
Release date
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
Process nodeBetter
Max monitors
Max resolution
Recommended PSU
Length
Thickness
Architecture
Launch price—
Transistor count
Die size
Shader units / cores
Memory cache
Power connector
Memory bus
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares 740M 8300G and RX 5500 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
740M 8300GRX 5500
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
190 FPS
189 FPS
1080p Ultra
133 FPS
133 FPS
1440p Ultra
104 FPS
77 FPS
4K Ultra
52 FPS
23 FPS
Counter-Strike 2740M 8300G190 FPSRX 5500189 FPS740M 8300G133 FPSRX 5500133 FPS740M 8300G104 FPSRX 550077 FPS740M 8300G52 FPSRX 550023 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077740M 8300G123 FPSRX 5500122 FPS740M 8300G106 FPSRX 5500105 FPS740M 8300G75 FPSRX 550056 FPS740M 8300G35 FPSRX 550015 FPS
Forza Horizon 5740M 8300G155 FPSRX 5500154 FPS740M 8300G100 FPSRX 550099 FPS740M 8300G93 FPSRX 550070 FPS740M 8300G76 FPSRX 550034 FPS
Hogwarts Legacy740M 8300G100 FPSRX 550099 FPS740M 8300G84 FPSRX 550083 FPS740M 8300G67 FPSRX 550050 FPS740M 8300G35 FPSRX 550016 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100463722%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100534419%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10046444%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100060200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100082200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10046484%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10046460%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10046444%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10046508%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10046444%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.212.1
Vulkan1.31.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingFSRFSR
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 2.1
Architecture and release
ArchitectureNot publicly specifiedRDNA 1.0
Process node4 nmBetter7 nm
Release date20232019
Device classMobileDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor countNot publicly specified6400 million
Die sizeNot publicly specified158 mm²
Shader units / coresNot publicly specified1408
Base clock800 MHz1500 MHzBetter
Boost clock2600 MHzBetter1845 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfaceIGPPCIe 4x8
LengthOEM dependentVaries by board
ThicknessOEM dependentVaries by board
Recommended PSUOEM dependentVaries by board
Power connectorIntegrated laptop power8 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIOEM dependentHDMI 2.0b
DisplayPortOEM dependentDisplayPort 1.4
USB Type-COEM dependentNo
Max monitorsOEM dependentVaries by board
Max resolutionOEM dependent7680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM- SMA4 GB GDDR6
Memory typeSMAGDDR6
Memory busSystem memory interface128 bit
TFLOPS2.875.196Better
Other comparisons
GTX 1050 3GBNVIDIAReviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 65
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (5)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (3)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: 740M 8300G or RX 5500?+
740M 8300G has the higher overall gaming score, while 740M 8300G offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
740M 8300G is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
740M 8300G is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
740M 8300G offers more overall performance, while 740M 8300G offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
740M 8300G is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
740M 8300G is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
740M 8300G leads in combined 1440p performance. 740M 8300G can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
740M 8300G is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RX 5500 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RX 5500 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to 740M 8300G if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.