AMD
Radeon 760M 8600G vs Radeon Pro W6800
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
Pro W6800
Aggregate performance score
We've compared 760M 8600G and Pro W6800 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗760M 8600G outperforms Pro W6800 by ~4% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+4%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon 760M 8600G (~4%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider 760M 8600G
- Lower recorded market price
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 · FSR
Reasons to consider Pro W6800
- Higher catalog performance index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.1 · FSR
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDPerformance
Price / performance
4854
10051
Graphics card ranking
Positions 14–19of 411
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon 760M 8600G
64 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon 760M 8600G
Price $245.00Based on catalog performance per unit of current market price, not measured FPS.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
48
54Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
41
45Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
39
43Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
47
72Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
54Better
52
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Device class
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
HDMI
DisplayPort
Power consumption—
TFLOPSBetter
Clock speedBetter
VRAM
Upscaling
Compute API
Memory type
Memory frequency—
Memory bandwidth—
Interface
Power consumption—
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
Process nodeBetter
Release date
Launch price—
Max monitors
Max resolution
Recommended PSU
Length
Thickness
Architecture
Transistor count
Die size
Shader units / cores
USB Type-C
Memory cache
Memory bus
Power connector
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares 760M 8600G and Pro W6800 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
760M 8600GPro W6800
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
197 FPS
221 FPS
1080p Ultra
139 FPS
155 FPS
1440p Ultra
108 FPS
121 FPS
4K Ultra
54 FPS
60 FPS
Counter-Strike 2760M 8600G197 FPSPro W6800221 FPS760M 8600G139 FPSPro W6800155 FPS760M 8600G108 FPSPro W6800121 FPS760M 8600G54 FPSPro W680060 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077760M 8600G127 FPSPro W6800143 FPS760M 8600G110 FPSPro W6800123 FPS760M 8600G78 FPSPro W680088 FPS760M 8600G36 FPSPro W680040 FPS
Forza Horizon 5760M 8600G160 FPSPro W6800180 FPS760M 8600G104 FPSPro W6800117 FPS760M 8600G97 FPSPro W6800109 FPS760M 8600G79 FPSPro W680088 FPS
Hogwarts Legacy760M 8600G104 FPSPro W6800117 FPS760M 8600G87 FPSPro W680097 FPS760M 8600G70 FPSPro W680078 FPS760M 8600G37 FPSPro W680041 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100485412%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100566413%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100486733%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1000100200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100072200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100487544%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100487240%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100486733%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100487949%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100486834%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.31.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingFSRFSR
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 2.1
Architecture and release
ArchitectureNot publicly specifiedRDNA 2.0
Process node4 nmBetter7 nm
Release date20232021
Device classMobileProf
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor countNot publicly specified26800 million
Die sizeNot publicly specified520 mm²
Shader units / coresNot publicly specified3840
Base clock800 MHz2075 MHzBetter
Boost clock2800 MHzBetter2320 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfaceIGPPCIe 4x16
LengthOEM dependent267 mm
ThicknessOEM dependentDual-slot
Recommended PSUOEM dependent600 W
Power connectorIntegrated laptop power6+8 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIOEM dependentHDMI 2.1
DisplayPortOEM dependentDisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-COEM dependentNo
Max monitorsOEM dependent6
Max resolutionOEM dependent7680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM- SMA32 GB GDDR6
Memory typeSMAGDDR6
Memory busSystem memory interface256 bit
TFLOPS5.3217.83Better
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 65
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (5)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (2)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: 760M 8600G or Pro W6800?+
760M 8600G has the higher overall gaming score, while 760M 8600G offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
760M 8600G is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
760M 8600G is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
760M 8600G offers more overall performance, while 760M 8600G offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
760M 8600G is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
760M 8600G is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
760M 8600G leads in combined 1440p performance. 760M 8600G can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
760M 8600G is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Pro W6800 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Pro W6800 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to 760M 8600G if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.