AMD
Radeon 760M 8600G vs GeForce RTX 2070
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
RTX 2070
Aggregate performance score
We've compared 760M 8600G and RTX 2070 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗760M 8600G outperforms RTX 2070 by ~9% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+9%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon 760M 8600G (~23%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider 760M 8600G
- Higher catalog performance index
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 · FSR
Reasons to consider RTX 2070
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5 · DLSS 2
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMD
NVIDIAPerformance
Price / performance
4844
10039
Graphics card ranking
Positions 14–19of 411
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce RTX 2070
178 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce RTX 2070
Price $154.00Based on catalog performance per unit of current market price, not measured FPS.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
48Better
44
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
41Better
38
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
39Better
36
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
47
79Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
54Better
44
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Device class
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
HDMI
DisplayPort
Power consumption—
TFLOPSBetter
Clock speedBetter
VRAM
Upscaling
Compute API
Memory type
Memory frequency—
Memory bandwidth—
Interface
Power consumption—
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
Process nodeBetter
Release date
Launch price—
Max monitors
Max resolution
Recommended PSU
Length
Thickness
Architecture
Transistor count
Die size
Shader units / cores
USB Type-C
Memory cache
Memory bus
Power connector
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares 760M 8600G and RTX 2070 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
760M 8600GRTX 2070
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
197 FPS
194 FPS
1080p Ultra
139 FPS
137 FPS
1440p Ultra
108 FPS
106 FPS
4K Ultra
54 FPS
39 FPS
Counter-Strike 2760M 8600G197 FPSRTX 2070194 FPS760M 8600G139 FPSRTX 2070137 FPS760M 8600G108 FPSRTX 2070106 FPS760M 8600G54 FPSRTX 207039 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077760M 8600G127 FPSRTX 2070125 FPS760M 8600G110 FPSRTX 2070108 FPS760M 8600G78 FPSRTX 207077 FPS760M 8600G36 FPSRTX 207026 FPS
Forza Horizon 5760M 8600G160 FPSRTX 2070158 FPS760M 8600G104 FPSRTX 2070103 FPS760M 8600G97 FPSRTX 207096 FPS760M 8600G79 FPSRTX 207058 FPS
Hogwarts Legacy760M 8600G104 FPSRTX 2070103 FPS760M 8600G87 FPSRTX 207086 FPS760M 8600G70 FPSRTX 207069 FPS760M 8600G37 FPSRTX 207027 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10048449%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100564913%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10048516%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100068200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100079200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100485514%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100485412%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10048516%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100485717%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10048516%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.31.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingFSRDLSS 2
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5
Architecture and release
ArchitectureNot publicly specifiedTuring
Process node4 nmBetter12 nm
Release date20232018
Device classMobileDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor countNot publicly specified10800 million
Die sizeNot publicly specified445 mm²
Shader units / coresNot publicly specified2304
Base clock800 MHz1410 MHzBetter
Boost clock2800 MHzBetter1620 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3x16
LengthOEM dependent229 mm
ThicknessOEM dependentDual-slot
Recommended PSUOEM dependent450 W
Power connectorIntegrated laptop power8 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIOEM dependentHDMI 2.0
DisplayPortOEM dependentDisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-COEM dependentYes
Max monitorsOEM dependent5
Max resolutionOEM dependent7680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM- SMA8 GB GDDR6
Memory typeSMAGDDR6
Memory busSystem memory interface256 bit
TFLOPS5.327.465Better
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 65
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (4)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (4)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record changed: product_prices
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: 760M 8600G or RTX 2070?+
760M 8600G has the higher overall gaming score, while 760M 8600G offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 2070 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 2070 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
760M 8600G offers more overall performance, while 760M 8600G offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 2070 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
760M 8600G is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
760M 8600G leads in combined 1440p performance. 760M 8600G can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
760M 8600G is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RTX 2070 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RTX 2070 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to 760M 8600G if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.