AMD
Radeon 760M 8600G vs Radeon RX 590
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
RX 590
Aggregate performance score
We've compared 760M 8600G and RX 590 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗760M 8600G outperforms RX 590 by ~17% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+17%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon 760M 8600G (~6%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider 760M 8600G
- Higher catalog performance index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 · FSR
Reasons to consider RX 590
- Lower recorded market price
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.1 · AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution (FSR)
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDPerformance
Price / performance
4841
100100
Graphics card ranking
Positions 14–19of 411
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 590
101 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon RX 590
Price $86.00Based on catalog performance per unit of current market price, not measured FPS.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
48Better
41
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
41Better
36
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
39Better
34
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
47
61Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
54Better
51
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Device class
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
HDMI
DisplayPort
Power consumption—
TFLOPSBetter
Clock speedBetter
VRAM
Upscaling
Compute API
Memory type
Memory frequency—
Memory bandwidth—
Interface
Power consumption—
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
Process nodeBetter
Release date
Launch price—
Max monitors
Max resolution
Recommended PSU
Length
Thickness
Architecture
Transistor count
Die size
Shader units / cores
USB Type-C
Memory cache
Memory bus
Power connector
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares 760M 8600G and RX 590 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
760M 8600GRX 590
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
197 FPS
191 FPS
1080p Ultra
139 FPS
134 FPS
1440p Ultra
108 FPS
97 FPS
4K Ultra
54 FPS
32 FPS
Counter-Strike 2760M 8600G197 FPSRX 590191 FPS760M 8600G139 FPSRX 590134 FPS760M 8600G108 FPSRX 59097 FPS760M 8600G54 FPSRX 59032 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077760M 8600G127 FPSRX 590123 FPS760M 8600G110 FPSRX 590106 FPS760M 8600G78 FPSRX 59070 FPS760M 8600G36 FPSRX 59021 FPS
Forza Horizon 5760M 8600G160 FPSRX 590155 FPS760M 8600G104 FPSRX 590101 FPS760M 8600G97 FPSRX 59087 FPS760M 8600G79 FPSRX 59046 FPS
Hogwarts Legacy760M 8600G104 FPSRX 590101 FPS760M 8600G87 FPSRX 59084 FPS760M 8600G70 FPSRX 59063 FPS760M 8600G37 FPSRX 59022 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100484116%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100564717%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10048492%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100068200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100061200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100485310%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10048528%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10048492%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100485615%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10048492%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.212.0
Vulkan1.31.3
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingFSRAMD FidelityFX Super Resolution (FSR)
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 2.1
Architecture and release
ArchitectureNot publicly specifiedGCN 4.0
Process node4 nmBetter12 nm
Release date20232018
Device classMobileDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor countNot publicly specified5700 million
Die sizeNot publicly specified232 mm²
Shader units / coresNot publicly specified2304
Base clock800 MHz1469 MHzBetter
Boost clock2800 MHzBetter1545 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3x16
LengthOEM dependent241 mm
ThicknessOEM dependentDual-slot
Recommended PSUOEM dependent450 W
Power connectorIntegrated laptop power8 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIOEM dependentHDMI 2.0b
DisplayPortOEM dependentDisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-COEM dependentNo
Max monitorsOEM dependent4
Max resolutionOEM dependent7680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM- SMA8 GB GDDR5
Memory typeSMAGDDR5
Memory busSystem memory interface256 bit
TFLOPS5.327.119Better
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 65
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (5)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (3)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: 760M 8600G or RX 590?+
760M 8600G has the higher overall gaming score, while 760M 8600G offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
760M 8600G is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
760M 8600G is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
760M 8600G offers more overall performance, while 760M 8600G offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
760M 8600G is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
760M 8600G is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
760M 8600G leads in combined 1440p performance. 760M 8600G can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
760M 8600G is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RX 590 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RX 590 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to 760M 8600G if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.