H2H

GeForce 8300 GS vs GeForce RTX 2060

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared 8300 GS and RTX 2060 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 2060 outperforms 8300 GS by 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+11%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.
QUICK COMPARISON ANALYSIS

GeForce 8300 GS vs GeForce RTX 2060: key takeaway

The comparison of 8300 GS and RTX 2060 shows a 11% advantage for RTX 2060 in gaming performance, while 8300 GS may still be stronger in value for money. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
Performance
3640
Efficiency
10083
Price / performance
100100
Memory capacity
460
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMPARISON RESULT

The devices received the same overall score

8300 GS leads in combined game performance. 8300 GS offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE0%

Performance is nearly identical

PRICE DIFFERENCE$90

8300 GS costs less

CATALOG POSITION

Graphics card ranking

Full ranking →

The ranking is recalculated automatically from catalog data.

Positions 133–138of 317
8300 GSnot in TOP100position in the GPU ranking
RTX 2060not in TOP100position in the GPU ranking
COMPARISON VERDICT

Which should you choose?

Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.

COMMUNITY CHOICE

GeForce RTX 2060

137 likes

Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.

$/FPSBEST PRICE / FPS

GeForce 8300 GS

100/100 · Price $79

The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.

OVERALL SCORE

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

The Summary score section compares 8300 GS and RTX 2060 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Category8300 GSRTX 2060
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
36
40Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
32
35Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
30
33Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
83
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
60
60
FULL COMPARISON

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

The Specifications section compares 8300 GS and RTX 2060 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Specification8300 GSRTX 2060
Device classDesktopDesktop
HDMIHDMI 2.0
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4a
DirectX10.012.2
Vulkan1.4
OpenGL3.34.6
TFLOPS0.0156.451Better
Power consumption40 WBetter160 W
Clock speed459 MHz1365-1680 MHzBetter
Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Power connectorNone8 pin
Release date20072019
ArchitectureTeslaTuring
ThicknessSingle-slotDual-slot
Max monitors35
Max resolution2560 × 16007680 × 4320
LengthVaries by board229 mm
UpscalingDLSS 2
Compute APIOpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5
Launch price$79Better$349
Shader units / cores81920Better
Base clock459 MHz1365 MHzBetter
Boost clock459 MHz1680 MHzBetter
VRAM128 MB DDR2Better6 GB GDDR6
Memory frequency800 MHzBetter14 GHz
Memory bus64 bit192 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth6400 GB/sBetter336 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 2x16PCIe 3x16
Power consumption40 WBetter160 W
Process node80 nm12 nmBetter
Recommended PSU200 WBetter450 W
Die size127 mm²Better445 mm²
Memory cacheL2 0.02 MBBetterL1 64 KB, L2 3 MB
Transistor count210 million10800 millionBetter
USB Type-CNoYes
GAME TEST BENCH

Gaming FPS

Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.

The Gaming FPS section compares 8300 GS and RTX 2060 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.

8300 GSRTX 2060
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong

Black Myth: Wukong

1080p High
20 FPSEstimated 64%
23 FPSEstimated 66%
1080p Ultra
17 FPSEstimated 64%
19 FPSEstimated 66%
1440p Ultra
10 FPSEstimated 60%
13 FPSEstimated 63%
4K Ultra
5 FPSEstimated 56%
5 FPSEstimated 56%
Game1080p High1080p Ultra1440p Ultra4K Ultra
Black Myth: Wukong8300 GS20 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 206023 FPSEstimated 66%8300 GS17 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 206019 FPSEstimated 66%8300 GS10 FPSEstimated 60%RTX 206013 FPSEstimated 63%8300 GS5 FPSEstimated 56%RTX 20605 FPSEstimated 56%
Call of Duty: Warzone8300 GS20 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 206023 FPSEstimated 66%8300 GS17 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 206019 FPSEstimated 66%8300 GS10 FPSEstimated 60%RTX 206013 FPSEstimated 63%8300 GS5 FPSEstimated 56%RTX 20605 FPSEstimated 56%
Counter-Strike 28300 GS171 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 2060192 FPSEstimated 74%8300 GS120 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 2060135 FPSEstimated 74%8300 GS74 FPSEstimated 68%RTX 206092 FPSEstimated 71%8300 GS28 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 206028 FPSEstimated 64%
Cyberpunk 20778300 GS111 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 2060124 FPSEstimated 74%8300 GS95 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 2060107 FPSEstimated 74%8300 GS54 FPSEstimated 68%RTX 206067 FPSEstimated 71%8300 GS19 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 206019 FPSEstimated 64%
Forza Horizon 58300 GS139 FPSEstimated 78%RTX 2060156 FPSEstimated 80%8300 GS90 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 2060101 FPSEstimated 74%8300 GS67 FPSEstimated 68%RTX 206083 FPSEstimated 71%8300 GS41 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 206042 FPSEstimated 64%
God of War Ragnarök8300 GS20 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 206023 FPSEstimated 66%8300 GS17 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 206019 FPSEstimated 66%8300 GS10 FPSEstimated 60%RTX 206013 FPSEstimated 63%8300 GS5 FPSEstimated 56%RTX 20605 FPSEstimated 56%
Hogwarts Legacy8300 GS90 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 2060101 FPSEstimated 74%8300 GS76 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 206085 FPSEstimated 74%8300 GS48 FPSEstimated 68%RTX 206060 FPSEstimated 71%8300 GS19 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 206019 FPSEstimated 64%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 20248300 GS20 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 206023 FPSEstimated 66%8300 GS17 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 206019 FPSEstimated 66%8300 GS10 FPSEstimated 60%RTX 206013 FPSEstimated 63%8300 GS5 FPSEstimated 56%RTX 20605 FPSEstimated 56%
Monster Hunter Wilds8300 GS20 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 206023 FPSEstimated 66%8300 GS17 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 206019 FPSEstimated 66%8300 GS10 FPSEstimated 60%RTX 206013 FPSEstimated 63%8300 GS5 FPSEstimated 56%RTX 20605 FPSEstimated 56%
Starfield8300 GS20 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 206023 FPSEstimated 66%8300 GS17 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 206019 FPSEstimated 66%8300 GS10 FPSEstimated 60%RTX 206013 FPSEstimated 63%8300 GS5 FPSEstimated 56%RTX 20605 FPSEstimated 56%
Average FPS8300 GS63 FPSRTX 206071 FPS8300 GS48 FPSRTX 206054 FPS8300 GS30 FPSRTX 206038 FPS8300 GS14 FPSRTX 206014 FPS
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

The Benchmarks section compares 8300 GS and RTX 2060 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Index8300 GSRTX 2060Difference
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100364011%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100284547%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100274652%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100460175%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001008319%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

The Detailed comparison section compares 8300 GS and RTX 2060 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Index8300 GSRTX 2060Difference
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100214980%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100234870%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100274652%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100185196%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100264656%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling

The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares 8300 GS and RTX 2060 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Specifications8300 GSRTX 2060
DirectX10.012.2
Vulkan1.4
OpenGL3.34.6
UpscalingDLSS 2
Compute APIOpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5

Architecture and release

The Architecture and release section compares 8300 GS and RTX 2060 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Specifications8300 GSRTX 2060
ArchitectureTeslaTuring
Process node80 nm12 nmBetter
Release date20072019
Device classDesktopDesktop

GPU cores, die and clocks

The Core layout and clocks section compares 8300 GS and RTX 2060 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Specifications8300 GSRTX 2060
Transistor count210 million10800 millionBetter
Die size127 mm²Better445 mm²
Shader units / cores81920Better
Base clock459 MHz1365 MHzBetter
Boost clock459 MHz1680 MHzBetter

Board size, power and compatibility

The Form factor and compatibility section compares 8300 GS and RTX 2060 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Specifications8300 GSRTX 2060
InterfacePCIe 2x16PCIe 3x16
LengthVaries by board229 mm
ThicknessSingle-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU200 WBetter450 W
Power connectorNone8 pin

Display outputs and limits

The Display outputs section compares 8300 GS and RTX 2060 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Specifications8300 GSRTX 2060
HDMIHDMI 2.0
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoYes
Max monitors35
Max resolution2560 × 16007680 × 4320

Memory and compute throughput

The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares 8300 GS and RTX 2060 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Specifications8300 GSRTX 2060
VRAM128 MB DDR2Better6 GB GDDR6
Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Memory bus64 bit192 bitBetter
TFLOPS0.0156.451Better
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER

Other comparisons

6

Reviews and questions

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device A8300 GS60
Device BRTX 206060
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: 8300 GS or RTX 2060?

8300 GS has the higher overall gaming score, while 8300 GS offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

8300 GS is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

8300 GS is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

8300 GS offers more overall performance, while 8300 GS offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

8300 GS is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

8300 GS is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

8300 GS leads in combined 1440p performance. 8300 GS can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

8300 GS is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

8300 GS is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

8300 GS is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to 8300 GS if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.