NVIDIA
GeForce 8400 GS vs GeForce GT 130
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GT 130
Aggregate performance score
We've compared 8400 GS and GT 130 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗8400 GS outperforms GT 130 by ~8% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+8%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce 8400 GS (~4%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider 8400 GS
- Higher catalog performance index
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1 · Not supported
Reasons to consider GT 130
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
4239
100100
100100
1313
Graphics card ranking
Positions 60–65of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce 8400 GS
170 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
42Better
39
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
37Better
34
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
34Better
32
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
59Better
57
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Device class
DirectX
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Release date
Architecture
Memory type
Power connector
Thickness
Compute API
Launch price
Process nodeBetter
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAM
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Recommended PSU
Length
Vulkan
HDMI
Die sizeBetter
Transistor countBetter
Shader units / coresBetter
Memory cache
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Upscaling
DisplayPort
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares 8400 GS and GT 130 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
8400 GSGT 130
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
204 FPS
195 FPS
1080p Ultra
143 FPS
137 FPS
1440p Ultra
88 FPS
77 FPS
4K Ultra
34 FPS
28 FPS
Counter-Strike 28400 GS204 FPSGT 130195 FPS8400 GS143 FPSGT 130137 FPS8400 GS88 FPSGT 13077 FPS8400 GS34 FPSGT 13028 FPS
Cyberpunk 20778400 GS132 FPSGT 130126 FPS8400 GS113 FPSGT 130108 FPS8400 GS64 FPSGT 13055 FPS8400 GS23 FPSGT 13019 FPS
Forza Horizon 58400 GS166 FPSGT 130158 FPS8400 GS108 FPSGT 130103 FPS8400 GS79 FPSGT 13069 FPS8400 GS49 FPSGT 13041 FPS
Hogwarts Legacy8400 GS108 FPSGT 130103 FPS8400 GS90 FPSGT 13086 FPS8400 GS57 FPSGT 13050 FPS8400 GS23 FPSGT 13019 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10042397%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10034326%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10034326%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10013130%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10029277%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10030287%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10034326%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10026248%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10033316%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX10.010.0
VulkanNot supportedNot supported
OpenGL3.33.3
UpscalingNot supportedNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1
Architecture and release
ArchitectureTeslaTesla
Process node80 nm55 nmBetter
Release date20072009
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count210 million314 millionBetter
Die size127 mm²121 mm²Better
Shader units / cores1632Better
Base clock567 MHzBetter500 MHz
Boost clock567 MHzBetter500 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 1x16PCIe 2x16
Length170 mmVaries by board
ThicknessSingle-slotMXM Module
Recommended PSU200 WVaries by board
Power connectorNone6 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIBoard dependentBoard dependent
DisplayPortBoard dependentBoard dependent
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors3Varies by board
Max resolution2560 × 1600Varies by board
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM512 MB DDR2512 MB DDR2
Memory typeDDR2DDR2
Memory bus64 bit192 bitBetter
TFLOPS0.0290.096Better
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 70
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (5)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (4)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: 8400 GS or GT 130?+
8400 GS has the higher overall gaming score, while 8400 GS offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
8400 GS is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
8400 GS is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
8400 GS offers more overall performance, while 8400 GS offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
8400 GS is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
8400 GS is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
8400 GS leads in combined 1440p performance. 8400 GS can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
8400 GS is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
8400 GS is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
8400 GS is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to 8400 GS if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.