H2H

GeForce 8400 GS vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared 8400 GS and RTX 2070 SUPER across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 2070 SUPER outperforms 8400 GS by 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+7%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.
QUICK COMPARISON ANALYSIS

GeForce 8400 GS vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER: key takeaway

The comparison of 8400 GS and RTX 2070 SUPER shows a 7% advantage for RTX 2070 SUPER in gaming performance, while 8400 GS may still be stronger in value for money. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
Performance
4245
Efficiency
10070
Price / performance
100100
Memory capacity
1368
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMPARISON RESULT

8400 GS is the best overall choice

8400 GS leads in combined game performance. 8400 GS offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE5%

8400 GS leads in the combined performance index

PRICE DIFFERENCE$140

8400 GS costs less

CATALOG POSITION

Graphics card ranking

Full ranking →

The ranking is recalculated automatically from catalog data.

Positions 59–64of 317
8400 GS#61position in the GPU ranking
RTX 2070 SUPERnot in TOP100position in the GPU ranking
COMPARISON VERDICT

Which should you choose?

Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.

COMMUNITY CHOICE

GeForce 8400 GS

170 likes

Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.

$/FPSBEST PRICE / FPS

GeForce 8400 GS

100/100 · Price $79

The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.

OVERALL SCORE

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

The Summary score section compares 8400 GS and RTX 2070 SUPER with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Category8400 GSRTX 2070 SUPER
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
42
45Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
37
39Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
34
36Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
70
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
64Better
61
FULL COMPARISON

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

The Specifications section compares 8400 GS and RTX 2070 SUPER with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Specification8400 GSRTX 2070 SUPER
Device classDesktopDesktop
HDMIHDMI 2.0
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4a
DirectX10.012.2
Vulkan1.4
OpenGL3.34.6
TFLOPS0.0299.062Better
Power consumption40 WBetter215 W
Release date20072019
ArchitectureTeslaTuring
Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Power connectorNone6+8 pin
ThicknessSingle-slotDual-slot
UpscalingDLSS 2
Compute APIOpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5
Launch price$79Better$499
Process node80 nm12 nmBetter
Clock speed567 MHz1605 - 1770 MHzBetter
Base clock567 MHz1605 MHzBetter
Boost clock567 MHz1770 MHzBetter
VRAM512 MB DDR2Better8 GB GDDR6
Memory frequency800 MHzBetter14 GHz
Memory bus64 bit256 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth6400 GB/sBetter448 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 1x16PCIe 3x16
Power consumption40 WBetter215 W
Recommended PSU200 WBetter550 W
Length170 mmBetter267 mm
Die size127 mm²Better545 mm²
Transistor count210 million13600 millionBetter
Shader units / cores162560Better
Memory cacheL2 0.02 MBBetterL1 64 KB, L2 4 MB
Max monitors35
Max resolution2560 × 16007680 × 4320
USB Type-CNoYes
GAME TEST BENCH

Gaming FPS

Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.

The Gaming FPS section compares 8400 GS and RTX 2070 SUPER across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.

8400 GSRTX 2070 SUPER
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong

Black Myth: Wukong

1080p High
24 FPSEstimated 64%
24 FPSEstimated 66%
1080p Ultra
21 FPSEstimated 64%
20 FPSEstimated 66%
1440p Ultra
12 FPSEstimated 60%
15 FPSEstimated 66%
4K Ultra
5 FPSEstimated 56%
6 FPSEstimated 60%
Game1080p High1080p Ultra1440p Ultra4K Ultra
Black Myth: Wukong8400 GS24 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 2070 SUPER24 FPSEstimated 66%8400 GS21 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 2070 SUPER20 FPSEstimated 66%8400 GS12 FPSEstimated 60%RTX 2070 SUPER15 FPSEstimated 66%8400 GS5 FPSEstimated 56%RTX 2070 SUPER6 FPSEstimated 60%
Call of Duty: Warzone8400 GS24 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 2070 SUPER24 FPSEstimated 66%8400 GS21 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 2070 SUPER20 FPSEstimated 66%8400 GS12 FPSEstimated 60%RTX 2070 SUPER15 FPSEstimated 66%8400 GS5 FPSEstimated 56%RTX 2070 SUPER6 FPSEstimated 60%
Counter-Strike 28400 GS204 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 2070 SUPER199 FPSEstimated 74%8400 GS143 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 2070 SUPER140 FPSEstimated 74%8400 GS88 FPSEstimated 68%RTX 2070 SUPER108 FPSEstimated 74%8400 GS34 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 2070 SUPER40 FPSEstimated 68%
Cyberpunk 20778400 GS132 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 2070 SUPER128 FPSEstimated 74%8400 GS113 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 2070 SUPER110 FPSEstimated 74%8400 GS64 FPSEstimated 68%RTX 2070 SUPER79 FPSEstimated 74%8400 GS23 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 2070 SUPER27 FPSEstimated 68%
Forza Horizon 58400 GS166 FPSEstimated 78%RTX 2070 SUPER162 FPSEstimated 80%8400 GS108 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 2070 SUPER105 FPSEstimated 74%8400 GS79 FPSEstimated 68%RTX 2070 SUPER98 FPSEstimated 74%8400 GS49 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 2070 SUPER59 FPSEstimated 68%
God of War Ragnarök8400 GS24 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 2070 SUPER24 FPSEstimated 66%8400 GS21 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 2070 SUPER20 FPSEstimated 66%8400 GS12 FPSEstimated 60%RTX 2070 SUPER15 FPSEstimated 66%8400 GS5 FPSEstimated 56%RTX 2070 SUPER6 FPSEstimated 60%
Hogwarts Legacy8400 GS108 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 2070 SUPER105 FPSEstimated 74%8400 GS90 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 2070 SUPER88 FPSEstimated 74%8400 GS57 FPSEstimated 68%RTX 2070 SUPER70 FPSEstimated 74%8400 GS23 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 2070 SUPER27 FPSEstimated 68%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 20248400 GS24 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 2070 SUPER24 FPSEstimated 66%8400 GS21 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 2070 SUPER20 FPSEstimated 66%8400 GS12 FPSEstimated 60%RTX 2070 SUPER15 FPSEstimated 66%8400 GS5 FPSEstimated 56%RTX 2070 SUPER6 FPSEstimated 60%
Monster Hunter Wilds8400 GS24 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 2070 SUPER24 FPSEstimated 66%8400 GS21 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 2070 SUPER20 FPSEstimated 66%8400 GS12 FPSEstimated 60%RTX 2070 SUPER15 FPSEstimated 66%8400 GS5 FPSEstimated 56%RTX 2070 SUPER6 FPSEstimated 60%
Starfield8400 GS24 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 2070 SUPER24 FPSEstimated 66%8400 GS21 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 2070 SUPER20 FPSEstimated 66%8400 GS12 FPSEstimated 60%RTX 2070 SUPER15 FPSEstimated 66%8400 GS5 FPSEstimated 56%RTX 2070 SUPER6 FPSEstimated 60%
Average FPS8400 GS75 FPSRTX 2070 SUPER74 FPS8400 GS58 FPSRTX 2070 SUPER56 FPS8400 GS36 FPSRTX 2070 SUPER45 FPS8400 GS16 FPSRTX 2070 SUPER19 FPS
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

The Benchmarks section compares 8400 GS and RTX 2070 SUPER with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Index8400 GSRTX 2070 SUPERDifference
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10042457%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100345140%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100345242%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1001368136%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001007035%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

The Detailed comparison section compares 8400 GS and RTX 2070 SUPER with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Index8400 GSRTX 2070 SUPERDifference
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100295562%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100305457%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100345242%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100265876%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100335245%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling

The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares 8400 GS and RTX 2070 SUPER with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Specifications8400 GSRTX 2070 SUPER
DirectX10.012.2
Vulkan1.4
OpenGL3.34.6
UpscalingDLSS 2
Compute APIOpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5

Architecture and release

The Architecture and release section compares 8400 GS and RTX 2070 SUPER with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Specifications8400 GSRTX 2070 SUPER
ArchitectureTeslaTuring
Process node80 nm12 nmBetter
Release date20072019
Device classDesktopDesktop

GPU cores, die and clocks

The Core layout and clocks section compares 8400 GS and RTX 2070 SUPER with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Specifications8400 GSRTX 2070 SUPER
Transistor count210 million13600 millionBetter
Die size127 mm²Better545 mm²
Shader units / cores162560Better
Base clock567 MHz1605 MHzBetter
Boost clock567 MHz1770 MHzBetter

Board size, power and compatibility

The Form factor and compatibility section compares 8400 GS and RTX 2070 SUPER with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Specifications8400 GSRTX 2070 SUPER
InterfacePCIe 1x16PCIe 3x16
Length170 mmBetter267 mm
ThicknessSingle-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU200 WBetter550 W
Power connectorNone6+8 pin

Display outputs and limits

The Display outputs section compares 8400 GS and RTX 2070 SUPER with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Specifications8400 GSRTX 2070 SUPER
HDMIHDMI 2.0
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoYes
Max monitors35
Max resolution2560 × 16007680 × 4320

Memory and compute throughput

The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares 8400 GS and RTX 2070 SUPER with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Specifications8400 GSRTX 2070 SUPER
VRAM512 MB DDR2Better8 GB GDDR6
Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Memory bus64 bit256 bitBetter
TFLOPS0.0299.062Better
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER

Other comparisons

6

Reviews and questions

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device A8400 GS64
Device BRTX 2070 SUPER61
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: 8400 GS or RTX 2070 SUPER?

8400 GS has the higher overall gaming score, while 8400 GS offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

8400 GS is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

8400 GS is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

8400 GS offers more overall performance, while 8400 GS offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

8400 GS is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

8400 GS is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

8400 GS leads in combined 1440p performance. 8400 GS can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

8400 GS is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

8400 GS is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

8400 GS is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to 8400 GS if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.