NVIDIA
GeForce 8400 GS vs Radeon RX 9050 4 GB
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
RX 9050 4 GB
Aggregate performance score
We've compared 8400 GS and RX 9050 4 GB across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RX 9050 4 GB outperforms 8400 GS by 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+2%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.GeForce 8400 GS vs Radeon RX 9050 4 GB: key takeaway
The comparison of 8400 GS and RX 9050 4 GB shows a 2% advantage for RX 9050 4 GB in gaming performance, while 8400 GS may still be stronger in value for money. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIA
AMDPerformance
Efficiency
Memory capacity
4243
100100
1360
COMPARISON RESULT
8400 GS is the best overall choice
8400 GS leads in combined game performance. 8400 GS offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
8400 GS leads in the combined performance index
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 53–58of 319
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce 8400 GS
170 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce 8400 GS
100/100 · Price $79The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares 8400 GS and RX 9050 4 GB with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
42
43Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
37
37
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
34
35Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
64Better
59
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares 8400 GS and RX 9050 4 GB with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Device classDesktopDesktop
DirectX10.012 Ultimate
OpenGL3.34.6
TFLOPS0.02910.6Better
Power consumption40 WBetter92 W
Release date20072026
ArchitectureTeslaRDNA 4
Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Power connectorNone8 pin
ThicknessSingle-slotVaries by board
Compute APIOpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1OpenCL 3.0
Launch price$79OEM only - not announced
Process node80 nm4 nmBetter
Clock speed567 MHz1920 - 2600 MHzBetter
Base clock567 MHz1920 MHzBetter
Boost clock567 MHz2600 MHzBetter
VRAM512 MB DDR2Better4 GB GDDR6
Memory frequency800 MHzBetter18 Gbps
Memory bus64 bit64 bit
Memory bandwidth6400 GB/sBetter144 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 1x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Power consumption40 WBetter92 W
Recommended PSU200 WBetter450 W
Length170 mmVaries by board
VulkanNot supported1.4
HDMIBoard dependentHDMI 2.1b
Die size127 mm²—
Transistor count210 million29.7 billionBetter
Shader units / cores161024Better
Memory cacheL2 0.02 MB16 MBBetter
Max monitors3Varies by board
Max resolution2560 × 16007680 x 4320
USB Type-CNoNo
UpscalingNot supportedFSR 4.1
DisplayPortBoard dependentDisplayPort 2.1a
GAME TEST BENCH
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares 8400 GS and RX 9050 4 GB across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
8400 GSRX 9050 4 GB
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong
1080p High
24 FPSEstimated 64%
—
1080p Ultra
21 FPSEstimated 64%
—
1440p Ultra
12 FPSEstimated 60%
—
4K Ultra
5 FPSEstimated 56%
—
Black Myth: Wukong8400 GS24 FPSEstimated 64%RX 9050 4 GB—8400 GS21 FPSEstimated 64%RX 9050 4 GB—8400 GS12 FPSEstimated 60%RX 9050 4 GB—8400 GS5 FPSEstimated 56%RX 9050 4 GB—
Call of Duty: Warzone8400 GS24 FPSEstimated 64%RX 9050 4 GB—8400 GS21 FPSEstimated 64%RX 9050 4 GB—8400 GS12 FPSEstimated 60%RX 9050 4 GB—8400 GS5 FPSEstimated 56%RX 9050 4 GB—
Counter-Strike 28400 GS204 FPSEstimated 72%RX 9050 4 GB—8400 GS143 FPSEstimated 72%RX 9050 4 GB—8400 GS88 FPSEstimated 68%RX 9050 4 GB—8400 GS34 FPSEstimated 64%RX 9050 4 GB—
Cyberpunk 20778400 GS132 FPSEstimated 72%RX 9050 4 GB—8400 GS113 FPSEstimated 72%RX 9050 4 GB—8400 GS64 FPSEstimated 68%RX 9050 4 GB—8400 GS23 FPSEstimated 64%RX 9050 4 GB—
Forza Horizon 58400 GS166 FPSEstimated 78%RX 9050 4 GB—8400 GS108 FPSEstimated 72%RX 9050 4 GB—8400 GS79 FPSEstimated 68%RX 9050 4 GB—8400 GS49 FPSEstimated 64%RX 9050 4 GB—
God of War Ragnarök8400 GS24 FPSEstimated 64%RX 9050 4 GB—8400 GS21 FPSEstimated 64%RX 9050 4 GB—8400 GS12 FPSEstimated 60%RX 9050 4 GB—8400 GS5 FPSEstimated 56%RX 9050 4 GB—
Hogwarts Legacy8400 GS108 FPSEstimated 72%RX 9050 4 GB—8400 GS90 FPSEstimated 72%RX 9050 4 GB—8400 GS57 FPSEstimated 68%RX 9050 4 GB—8400 GS23 FPSEstimated 64%RX 9050 4 GB—
Microsoft Flight Simulator 20248400 GS24 FPSEstimated 64%RX 9050 4 GB—8400 GS21 FPSEstimated 64%RX 9050 4 GB—8400 GS12 FPSEstimated 60%RX 9050 4 GB—8400 GS5 FPSEstimated 56%RX 9050 4 GB—
Monster Hunter Wilds8400 GS24 FPSEstimated 64%RX 9050 4 GB—8400 GS21 FPSEstimated 64%RX 9050 4 GB—8400 GS12 FPSEstimated 60%RX 9050 4 GB—8400 GS5 FPSEstimated 56%RX 9050 4 GB—
Starfield8400 GS24 FPSEstimated 64%RX 9050 4 GB—8400 GS21 FPSEstimated 64%RX 9050 4 GB—8400 GS12 FPSEstimated 60%RX 9050 4 GB—8400 GS5 FPSEstimated 56%RX 9050 4 GB—
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares 8400 GS and RX 9050 4 GB with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10042432%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100345242%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100344834%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1001360129%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares 8400 GS and RX 9050 4 GB with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100295155%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100305050%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100344834%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100265368%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100334837%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares 8400 GS and RX 9050 4 GB with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DirectX10.012 Ultimate
VulkanNot supported1.4
OpenGL3.34.6
UpscalingNot supportedFSR 4.1
Compute APIOpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1OpenCL 3.0
Architecture and release
The Architecture and release section compares 8400 GS and RX 9050 4 GB with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
ArchitectureTeslaRDNA 4
Process node80 nm4 nmBetter
Release date20072026
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
The Core layout and clocks section compares 8400 GS and RX 9050 4 GB with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Transistor count210 million29.7 billionBetter
Die size127 mm²—
Shader units / cores161024Better
Base clock567 MHz1920 MHzBetter
Boost clock567 MHz2600 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
The Form factor and compatibility section compares 8400 GS and RX 9050 4 GB with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
InterfacePCIe 1x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length170 mmVaries by board
ThicknessSingle-slotVaries by board
Recommended PSU200 WBetter450 W
Power connectorNone8 pin
Display outputs and limits
The Display outputs section compares 8400 GS and RX 9050 4 GB with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
HDMIBoard dependentHDMI 2.1b
DisplayPortBoard dependentDisplayPort 2.1a
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors3Varies by board
Max resolution2560 × 16007680 x 4320
Memory and compute throughput
The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares 8400 GS and RX 9050 4 GB with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
VRAM512 MB DDR2Better4 GB GDDR6
Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Memory bus64 bit64 bit
TFLOPS0.02910.6Better
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
Arc A310IntelReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: 8400 GS or RX 9050 4 GB?+
8400 GS has the higher overall gaming score, while 8400 GS offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
8400 GS is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
8400 GS is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
8400 GS offers more overall performance, while 8400 GS offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
8400 GS is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
8400 GS is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
8400 GS leads in combined 1440p performance. 8400 GS can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
8400 GS is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
8400 GS is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
8400 GS is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to 8400 GS if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.