H2H

GeForce 8600 GS vs GeForce 8800 Ultra

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared 8600 GS and 8800 Ultra across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

8600 GS outperforms 8800 Ultra by 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+7%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.
QUICK COMPARISON ANALYSIS

GeForce 8600 GS vs GeForce 8800 Ultra: key takeaway

The comparison of 8600 GS and 8800 Ultra shows a 7% advantage for 8600 GS in gaming performance, while 8800 Ultra may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
Performance
4643
Efficiency
10084
Price / performance
100100
Memory capacity
1317
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMPARISON RESULT

8600 GS is the best overall choice

8600 GS leads in combined game performance. 8600 GS offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE8%

8600 GS leads in the combined performance index

PRICE DIFFERENCE$0

Prices are identical

CATALOG POSITION

Graphics card ranking

Full ranking →

The ranking is recalculated automatically from catalog data.

Positions 45–50of 317
8600 GS#47position in the GPU ranking
8800 Ultra#86position in the GPU ranking
COMPARISON VERDICT

Which should you choose?

Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.

COMMUNITY CHOICE

GeForce 8600 GS

157 likes

Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.

$/FPSBEST PRICE / FPS

GeForce 8600 GS

100/100 · Price $79

The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.

OVERALL SCORE

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

The Summary score section compares 8600 GS and 8800 Ultra with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Category8600 GS8800 Ultra
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
46Better
43
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
40Better
37
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
37Better
35
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
84
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
67Better
62
FULL COMPARISON

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

The Specifications section compares 8600 GS and 8800 Ultra with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Specification8600 GS8800 Ultra
Device classDesktopDesktop
Power consumption47 WBetter171 W
HDMI
DisplayPort
DirectX10.010.0
Vulkan
OpenGL3.33.3
TFLOPS0.0380.387Better
Memory frequency800 MHzBetter2,2 GHz
Memory typeDDR2GDDR3
Power connectorNone6+6 pin
Release date20072007
ArchitectureTeslaTesla
ThicknessSingle-slotDual-slot
Upscaling
LengthVaries by board270 mm
Compute APIOpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1OpenCL 1.0, CUDA 1.0
Launch price$79$79
Clock speed540 MHz612 MHzBetter
Base clock540 MHz612 MHzBetter
Boost clock540 MHz612 MHzBetter
VRAM512 MB DDR2768 MB GDDR3Better
Memory bus128 bit384 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth12800 GB/sBetter106 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 1x16PCIe 1x16
Power consumption47 WBetter171 W
Process node80 nmBetter90 nm
Recommended PSU200 WBetter450 W
Die size169 mm²Better484 mm²
Transistor count289 million681 millionBetter
Shader units / cores16128Better
Memory cacheL2 0.03 MBL2 0.1 MB
Max monitors33
Max resolution2560 × 16002560 × 1600
USB Type-CNoNo
GAME TEST BENCH

Gaming FPS

Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.

The Gaming FPS section compares 8600 GS and 8800 Ultra across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.

8600 GS8800 Ultra
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong

Black Myth: Wukong

1080p High
26 FPSEstimated 65%
26 FPSEstimated 64%
1080p Ultra
22 FPSEstimated 65%
22 FPSEstimated 64%
1440p Ultra
14 FPSEstimated 61%
12 FPSEstimated 58%
4K Ultra
6 FPSEstimated 57%
5 FPSEstimated 55%
Game1080p High1080p Ultra1440p Ultra4K Ultra
Black Myth: Wukong8600 GS26 FPSEstimated 65%8800 Ultra26 FPSEstimated 64%8600 GS22 FPSEstimated 65%8800 Ultra22 FPSEstimated 64%8600 GS14 FPSEstimated 61%8800 Ultra12 FPSEstimated 58%8600 GS6 FPSEstimated 57%8800 Ultra5 FPSEstimated 55%
Call of Duty: Warzone8600 GS26 FPSEstimated 65%8800 Ultra26 FPSEstimated 64%8600 GS22 FPSEstimated 65%8800 Ultra22 FPSEstimated 64%8600 GS14 FPSEstimated 61%8800 Ultra12 FPSEstimated 58%8600 GS6 FPSEstimated 57%8800 Ultra5 FPSEstimated 55%
Counter-Strike 28600 GS220 FPSEstimated 73%8800 Ultra217 FPSEstimated 72%8600 GS154 FPSEstimated 73%8800 Ultra152 FPSEstimated 72%8600 GS98 FPSEstimated 69%8800 Ultra85 FPSEstimated 66%8600 GS37 FPSEstimated 65%8800 Ultra32 FPSEstimated 63%
Cyberpunk 20778600 GS142 FPSEstimated 73%8800 Ultra140 FPSEstimated 72%8600 GS122 FPSEstimated 73%8800 Ultra121 FPSEstimated 72%8600 GS71 FPSEstimated 69%8800 Ultra62 FPSEstimated 66%8600 GS25 FPSEstimated 65%8800 Ultra22 FPSEstimated 63%
Forza Horizon 58600 GS179 FPSEstimated 79%8800 Ultra176 FPSEstimated 78%8600 GS116 FPSEstimated 73%8800 Ultra114 FPSEstimated 72%8600 GS88 FPSEstimated 69%8800 Ultra77 FPSEstimated 66%8600 GS54 FPSEstimated 65%8800 Ultra47 FPSEstimated 63%
God of War Ragnarök8600 GS26 FPSEstimated 65%8800 Ultra26 FPSEstimated 64%8600 GS22 FPSEstimated 65%8800 Ultra22 FPSEstimated 64%8600 GS14 FPSEstimated 61%8800 Ultra12 FPSEstimated 58%8600 GS6 FPSEstimated 57%8800 Ultra5 FPSEstimated 55%
Hogwarts Legacy8600 GS116 FPSEstimated 73%8800 Ultra114 FPSEstimated 72%8600 GS97 FPSEstimated 73%8800 Ultra96 FPSEstimated 72%8600 GS64 FPSEstimated 69%8800 Ultra55 FPSEstimated 66%8600 GS25 FPSEstimated 65%8800 Ultra22 FPSEstimated 63%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 20248600 GS26 FPSEstimated 65%8800 Ultra26 FPSEstimated 64%8600 GS22 FPSEstimated 65%8800 Ultra22 FPSEstimated 64%8600 GS14 FPSEstimated 61%8800 Ultra12 FPSEstimated 58%8600 GS6 FPSEstimated 57%8800 Ultra5 FPSEstimated 55%
Monster Hunter Wilds8600 GS26 FPSEstimated 65%8800 Ultra26 FPSEstimated 64%8600 GS22 FPSEstimated 65%8800 Ultra22 FPSEstimated 64%8600 GS14 FPSEstimated 61%8800 Ultra12 FPSEstimated 58%8600 GS6 FPSEstimated 57%8800 Ultra5 FPSEstimated 55%
Starfield8600 GS26 FPSEstimated 65%8800 Ultra26 FPSEstimated 64%8600 GS22 FPSEstimated 65%8800 Ultra22 FPSEstimated 64%8600 GS14 FPSEstimated 61%8800 Ultra12 FPSEstimated 58%8600 GS6 FPSEstimated 57%8800 Ultra5 FPSEstimated 55%
Average FPS8600 GS81 FPS8800 Ultra80 FPS8600 GS62 FPS8800 Ultra62 FPS8600 GS41 FPS8800 Ultra35 FPS8600 GS18 FPS8800 Ultra15 FPS
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

The Benchmarks section compares 8600 GS and 8800 Ultra with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Index8600 GS8800 UltraDifference
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10046437%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10037363%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10037363%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100131727%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001008417%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

The Detailed comparison section compares 8600 GS and 8800 Ultra with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Index8600 GS8800 UltraDifference
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10031310%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10033330%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10037363%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10028294%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10036353%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling

The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares 8600 GS and 8800 Ultra with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Specifications8600 GS8800 Ultra
DirectX10.010.0
Vulkan
OpenGL3.33.3
Upscaling
Compute APIOpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1OpenCL 1.0, CUDA 1.0

Architecture and release

The Architecture and release section compares 8600 GS and 8800 Ultra with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Specifications8600 GS8800 Ultra
ArchitectureTeslaTesla
Process node80 nmBetter90 nm
Release date20072007
Device classDesktopDesktop

GPU cores, die and clocks

The Core layout and clocks section compares 8600 GS and 8800 Ultra with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Specifications8600 GS8800 Ultra
Transistor count289 million681 millionBetter
Die size169 mm²Better484 mm²
Shader units / cores16128Better
Base clock540 MHz612 MHzBetter
Boost clock540 MHz612 MHzBetter

Board size, power and compatibility

The Form factor and compatibility section compares 8600 GS and 8800 Ultra with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Specifications8600 GS8800 Ultra
InterfacePCIe 1x16PCIe 1x16
LengthVaries by board270 mm
ThicknessSingle-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU200 WBetter450 W
Power connectorNone6+6 pin

Display outputs and limits

The Display outputs section compares 8600 GS and 8800 Ultra with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Specifications8600 GS8800 Ultra
HDMI
DisplayPort
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors33
Max resolution2560 × 16002560 × 1600

Memory and compute throughput

The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares 8600 GS and 8800 Ultra with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Specifications8600 GS8800 Ultra
VRAM512 MB DDR2768 MB GDDR3Better
Memory typeDDR2GDDR3
Memory bus128 bit384 bitBetter
TFLOPS0.0380.387Better
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER

Other comparisons

6

Reviews and questions

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device A8600 GS67
Device B8800 Ultra62
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: 8600 GS or 8800 Ultra?

8600 GS has the higher overall gaming score, while 8600 GS offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

8600 GS is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

8600 GS is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

8600 GS offers more overall performance, while 8600 GS offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

8600 GS is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

8600 GS is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

8600 GS leads in combined 1440p performance. 8600 GS can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

8600 GS is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

8600 GS is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

8600 GS is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to 8600 GS if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.