H2H

GeForce 8600 GTS vs GeForce 8800 GTS rev 2

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared 8600 GTS and 8800 GTS rev 2 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

8600 GTS outperforms 8800 GTS rev 2 by 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+1%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.
QUICK COMPARISON ANALYSIS

GeForce 8600 GTS vs GeForce 8800 GTS rev 2: key takeaway

The comparison of 8600 GTS and 8800 GTS rev 2 shows a 0% advantage for 8600 GTS in gaming performance, while 8800 GTS rev 2 may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
Performance
3939
Efficiency
10096
Price / performance
100100
Memory capacity
1313
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMPARISON RESULT

8600 GTS is the best overall choice

8600 GTS leads in combined game performance. 8600 GTS offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE2%

8600 GTS leads in the combined performance index

PRICE DIFFERENCE$0

Prices are identical

CATALOG POSITION

Graphics card ranking

Full ranking →

The ranking is recalculated automatically from catalog data.

Positions 70–75of 319
8600 GTS#72position in the GPU ranking
8800 GTS rev 2#74position in the GPU ranking
COMPARISON VERDICT

Which should you choose?

Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.

COMMUNITY CHOICE

GeForce 8800 GTS rev 2

84 likes

Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.

$/FPSBEST PRICE / FPS

GeForce 8600 GTS

100/100 · Price $79

The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.

OVERALL SCORE

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

The Summary score section compares 8600 GTS and 8800 GTS rev 2 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Category8600 GTS8800 GTS rev 2
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
39
39
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
34
34
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
32
32
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
96
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
62Better
61
FULL COMPARISON

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

The Specifications section compares 8600 GTS and 8800 GTS rev 2 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Specification8600 GTS8800 GTS rev 2
Device classDesktopDesktop
DirectX10.010.0
OpenGL3.33.3
TFLOPS0.093Better0.022
Power consumption60 WBetter135 W
Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Power connector6 pin6 pin
Release date20072007
ArchitectureTeslaTesla
ThicknessSingle-slotSingle-slot
Clock speed675 MHzBetter650 MHz
Base clock675 MHzBetter650 MHz
Boost clock675 MHzBetter650 MHz
VRAM512 MB GDDR3512 MB GDDR3
Memory frequency2 GHzBetter1,64 GHz
Memory bus128 bit256 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth32 GB/s52 GB/sBetter
InterfacePCIe 1x16PCIe 2x16
Power consumption60 WBetter135 W
Process node80 nm65 nmBetter
Recommended PSU250 W200 WBetter
Length198 mm170 mmBetter
Compute APIOpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1
Launch price$79$79
Shader units / cores32Better8
Die size169 mm²86 mm²Better
Memory cacheL2 0.03 MBL2 0.02 MB
Transistor count289 millionBetter210 million
Max monitors3Varies by board
Max resolution2560 × 1600Varies by board
USB Type-CNoNo
UpscalingNot supportedNot supported
VulkanNot supportedNot supported
DisplayPortBoard dependentBoard dependent
HDMIBoard dependentBoard dependent
GAME TEST BENCH

Gaming FPS

Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.

The Gaming FPS section compares 8600 GTS and 8800 GTS rev 2 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.

8600 GTS8800 GTS rev 2
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong

Black Myth: Wukong

1080p High
23 FPSEstimated 64%
23 FPSEstimated 64%
1080p Ultra
20 FPSEstimated 64%
20 FPSEstimated 64%
1440p Ultra
10 FPSEstimated 58%
11 FPSEstimated 58%
4K Ultra
5 FPSEstimated 55%
5 FPSEstimated 55%
Game1080p High1080p Ultra1440p Ultra4K Ultra
Black Myth: Wukong8600 GTS23 FPSEstimated 64%8800 GTS rev 223 FPSEstimated 64%8600 GTS20 FPSEstimated 64%8800 GTS rev 220 FPSEstimated 64%8600 GTS10 FPSEstimated 58%8800 GTS rev 211 FPSEstimated 58%8600 GTS5 FPSEstimated 55%8800 GTS rev 25 FPSEstimated 55%
Call of Duty: Warzone8600 GTS23 FPSEstimated 64%8800 GTS rev 223 FPSEstimated 64%8600 GTS20 FPSEstimated 64%8800 GTS rev 220 FPSEstimated 64%8600 GTS10 FPSEstimated 58%8800 GTS rev 211 FPSEstimated 58%8600 GTS5 FPSEstimated 55%8800 GTS rev 25 FPSEstimated 55%
Counter-Strike 28600 GTS197 FPSEstimated 72%8800 GTS rev 2194 FPSEstimated 72%8600 GTS138 FPSEstimated 72%8800 GTS rev 2137 FPSEstimated 72%8600 GTS74 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 276 FPSEstimated 66%8600 GTS27 FPSEstimated 62%8800 GTS rev 229 FPSEstimated 63%
Cyberpunk 20778600 GTS127 FPSEstimated 72%8800 GTS rev 2125 FPSEstimated 72%8600 GTS109 FPSEstimated 72%8800 GTS rev 2108 FPSEstimated 72%8600 GTS54 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 255 FPSEstimated 66%8600 GTS18 FPSEstimated 62%8800 GTS rev 219 FPSEstimated 63%
Forza Horizon 58600 GTS160 FPSEstimated 78%8800 GTS rev 2158 FPSEstimated 78%8600 GTS104 FPSEstimated 72%8800 GTS rev 2102 FPSEstimated 72%8600 GTS67 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 269 FPSEstimated 66%8600 GTS39 FPSEstimated 62%8800 GTS rev 242 FPSEstimated 63%
God of War Ragnarök8600 GTS23 FPSEstimated 64%8800 GTS rev 223 FPSEstimated 64%8600 GTS20 FPSEstimated 64%8800 GTS rev 220 FPSEstimated 64%8600 GTS10 FPSEstimated 58%8800 GTS rev 211 FPSEstimated 58%8600 GTS5 FPSEstimated 55%8800 GTS rev 25 FPSEstimated 55%
Hogwarts Legacy8600 GTS104 FPSEstimated 72%8800 GTS rev 2102 FPSEstimated 72%8600 GTS87 FPSEstimated 72%8800 GTS rev 286 FPSEstimated 72%8600 GTS48 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 250 FPSEstimated 66%8600 GTS18 FPSEstimated 62%8800 GTS rev 220 FPSEstimated 63%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 20248600 GTS23 FPSEstimated 64%8800 GTS rev 223 FPSEstimated 64%8600 GTS20 FPSEstimated 64%8800 GTS rev 220 FPSEstimated 64%8600 GTS10 FPSEstimated 58%8800 GTS rev 211 FPSEstimated 58%8600 GTS5 FPSEstimated 55%8800 GTS rev 25 FPSEstimated 55%
Monster Hunter Wilds8600 GTS23 FPSEstimated 64%8800 GTS rev 223 FPSEstimated 64%8600 GTS20 FPSEstimated 64%8800 GTS rev 220 FPSEstimated 64%8600 GTS10 FPSEstimated 58%8800 GTS rev 211 FPSEstimated 58%8600 GTS5 FPSEstimated 55%8800 GTS rev 25 FPSEstimated 55%
Starfield8600 GTS23 FPSEstimated 64%8800 GTS rev 223 FPSEstimated 64%8600 GTS20 FPSEstimated 64%8800 GTS rev 220 FPSEstimated 64%8600 GTS10 FPSEstimated 58%8800 GTS rev 211 FPSEstimated 58%8600 GTS5 FPSEstimated 55%8800 GTS rev 25 FPSEstimated 55%
Average FPS8600 GTS73 FPS8800 GTS rev 272 FPS8600 GTS56 FPS8800 GTS rev 255 FPS8600 GTS30 FPS8800 GTS rev 232 FPS8600 GTS13 FPS8800 GTS rev 214 FPS
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

The Benchmarks section compares 8600 GTS and 8800 GTS rev 2 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Index8600 GTS8800 GTS rev 2Difference
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10039390%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10033323%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10032320%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10013130%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100100964%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

The Detailed comparison section compares 8600 GTS and 8800 GTS rev 2 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Index8600 GTS8800 GTS rev 2Difference
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10027270%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10028280%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10032320%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10024240%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10031310%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling

The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares 8600 GTS and 8800 GTS rev 2 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Specifications8600 GTS8800 GTS rev 2
DirectX10.010.0
VulkanNot supportedNot supported
OpenGL3.33.3
UpscalingNot supportedNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1

Architecture and release

The Architecture and release section compares 8600 GTS and 8800 GTS rev 2 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Specifications8600 GTS8800 GTS rev 2
ArchitectureTeslaTesla
Process node80 nm65 nmBetter
Release date20072007
Device classDesktopDesktop

GPU cores, die and clocks

The Core layout and clocks section compares 8600 GTS and 8800 GTS rev 2 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Specifications8600 GTS8800 GTS rev 2
Transistor count289 millionBetter210 million
Die size169 mm²86 mm²Better
Shader units / cores32Better8
Base clock675 MHzBetter650 MHz
Boost clock675 MHzBetter650 MHz

Board size, power and compatibility

The Form factor and compatibility section compares 8600 GTS and 8800 GTS rev 2 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Specifications8600 GTS8800 GTS rev 2
InterfacePCIe 1x16PCIe 2x16
Length198 mm170 mmBetter
ThicknessSingle-slotSingle-slot
Recommended PSU250 W200 WBetter
Power connector6 pin6 pin

Display outputs and limits

The Display outputs section compares 8600 GTS and 8800 GTS rev 2 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Specifications8600 GTS8800 GTS rev 2
HDMIBoard dependentBoard dependent
DisplayPortBoard dependentBoard dependent
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors3Varies by board
Max resolution2560 × 1600Varies by board

Memory and compute throughput

The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares 8600 GTS and 8800 GTS rev 2 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Specifications8600 GTS8800 GTS rev 2
VRAM512 MB GDDR3512 MB GDDR3
Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Memory bus128 bit256 bitBetter
TFLOPS0.093Better0.022
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER

Other comparisons

6

Reviews and questions

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device A8600 GTS62
Device B8800 GTS rev 261
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: 8600 GTS or 8800 GTS rev 2?

8600 GTS has the higher overall gaming score, while 8600 GTS offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

8600 GTS is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

8600 GTS is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

8600 GTS offers more overall performance, while 8600 GTS offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

8600 GTS is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

8600 GTS is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

8600 GTS leads in combined 1440p performance. 8600 GTS can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

8600 GTS is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

8600 GTS is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

8600 GTS is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to 8600 GTS if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.