NVIDIA
GeForce 8800 GS vs Intel Arc Pro B50
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
Intel
Arc Pro B50
Aggregate performance score
We've compared 8800 GS and Arc Pro B50 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗8800 GS outperforms Arc Pro B50 by ~3% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+3%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Partially verifiedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 16Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce 8800 GS (~3%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider 8800 GS
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1 · Not supported
Reasons to consider Arc Pro B50
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 / oneAPI · Intel XeSS
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIA
IntelPerformance
Efficiency
Memory capacity
4354
100100
1788
Graphics card ranking
Positions 179–184of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce 8800 GS
141 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
43
54Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
37
45Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
35
43Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
60Better
58
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Device class
DirectX
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumption—
Release date
Architecture
Memory type
Power connector
Thickness
Compute API
Launch price—
Shader units / coresBetter
Clock speedBetter
Base clock
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSUBetter
LengthBetter
Die size
Memory cache
Transistor count
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Vulkan
DisplayPort
HDMI
Upscaling
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares 8800 GS and Arc Pro B50 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
8800 GSArc Pro B50
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
216 FPS
—
1080p Ultra
152 FPS
—
1440p Ultra
85 FPS
—
4K Ultra
31 FPS
—
Counter-Strike 28800 GS216 FPSArc Pro B50—8800 GS152 FPSArc Pro B50—8800 GS85 FPSArc Pro B50—8800 GS31 FPSArc Pro B50—
Cyberpunk 20778800 GS140 FPSArc Pro B50—8800 GS120 FPSArc Pro B50—8800 GS62 FPSArc Pro B50—8800 GS21 FPSArc Pro B50—
Forza Horizon 58800 GS176 FPSArc Pro B50—8800 GS114 FPSArc Pro B50—8800 GS77 FPSArc Pro B50—8800 GS45 FPSArc Pro B50—
Hogwarts Legacy8800 GS114 FPSArc Pro B50—8800 GS95 FPSArc Pro B50—8800 GS55 FPSArc Pro B50—8800 GS21 FPSArc Pro B50—
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100435423%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100356459%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100366456%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1001788135%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100316976%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100336869%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100366456%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100297386%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100356459%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX10.0DirectX 12 Ultimate
VulkanNot supported1.4
OpenGL3.3Up to 4.6
UpscalingNot supportedIntel XeSS
Compute APIOpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1OpenCL 3.0 / oneAPI
Architecture and release
ArchitectureTeslaXe2
Process node65 nmTSMC N5Better
Release date2008Q3'25
Device classDesktopProf
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count754 millionNot publicly specified
Die size324 mm²Not publicly specified
Shader units / cores96Better16 Xe cores
Base clock550 MHzNot publicly specified
Boost clock550 MHz2600 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 2x16PCI Express 5.0 x8
Length229 mm167.6 mm (Intel reference)Better
ThicknessSingle-slot2 slots (Intel reference)
Recommended PSU300 W280 WBetter
Power connector6 pinNo Connector Required
Display outputs and limits
HDMIBoard dependentNo native HDMI on Intel reference board
DisplayPortBoard dependent4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1 (Intel reference)
USB Type-CNoVaries by board manufacturer
Max monitors34
Max resolution2560 × 16007680 x 4320@60Hz
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM768 MB GDDR3Better16 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Memory bus192 bitBetter128 bit
TFLOPS0.26410.65Better
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 16
- Specifications
- 28 / 68
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (2)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (2)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: 8800 GS or Arc Pro B50?+
8800 GS has the higher overall gaming score, while 8800 GS offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
8800 GS is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
8800 GS is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
8800 GS offers more overall performance, while 8800 GS offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
8800 GS is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
8800 GS is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
8800 GS leads in combined 1440p performance. 8800 GS can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
8800 GS is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
8800 GS is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
8800 GS is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to 8800 GS if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.