NVIDIA
GeForce 8800 GS vs Radeon 520
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
Radeon 520
Aggregate performance score
We've compared 8800 GS and Radeon 520 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗8800 GS outperforms Radeon 520 by ~13% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+13%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce 8800 GS (~50%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider 8800 GS
- Higher catalog performance index
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1 · Not supported
Reasons to consider Radeon 520
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.0 / DirectCompute 5.0 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIA
AMDPerformance
Price / performance
4338
10065
Graphics card ranking
Positions 179–184of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce 8800 GS
141 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
43Better
38
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
37Better
34
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
35Better
31
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
33
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
60Better
40
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Device class
DirectX
OpenGL
TFLOPS
Power consumption—
Release date
Architecture
Memory type
Power connector
Thickness
Compute API
Launch price—
Shader units / cores
Clock speed—
Base clock
Boost clock
VRAM
Memory frequency—
Memory bus
Memory bandwidth—
Interface
Power consumption—
Process node—
Recommended PSU
Length
Die size
Memory cache
Transistor count
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Vulkan
DisplayPort
HDMI
Upscaling
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares 8800 GS and Radeon 520 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
8800 GSRadeon 520
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
216 FPS
157 FPS
1080p Ultra
152 FPS
111 FPS
1440p Ultra
85 FPS
86 FPS
4K Ultra
31 FPS
43 FPS
Counter-Strike 28800 GS216 FPSRadeon 520157 FPS8800 GS152 FPSRadeon 520111 FPS8800 GS85 FPSRadeon 52086 FPS8800 GS31 FPSRadeon 52043 FPS
Cyberpunk 20778800 GS140 FPSRadeon 520102 FPS8800 GS120 FPSRadeon 52088 FPS8800 GS62 FPSRadeon 52062 FPS8800 GS21 FPSRadeon 52029 FPS
Forza Horizon 58800 GS176 FPSRadeon 520128 FPS8800 GS114 FPSRadeon 52083 FPS8800 GS77 FPSRadeon 52077 FPS8800 GS45 FPSRadeon 52063 FPS
Hogwarts Legacy8800 GS114 FPSRadeon 52083 FPS8800 GS95 FPSRadeon 52069 FPS8800 GS55 FPSRadeon 52056 FPS8800 GS21 FPSRadeon 52029 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100433812%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10035388%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10036385%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100170200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001000200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100313820%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100333814%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10036385%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100293827%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10035388%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX10.012.0
VulkanNot supported1.2
OpenGL3.34.6
UpscalingNot supportedNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1OpenCL 2.0 / DirectCompute 5.0
Architecture and release
ArchitectureTeslaPolaris
Process node65 nm—
Release date20082017
Device classDesktopMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count754 millionNot publicly specified
Die size324 mm²Not publicly specified
Shader units / cores96Not publicly specified
Base clock550 MHzOEM/TGP dependent
Boost clock550 MHzOEM/TGP dependent
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 2x16OEM platform dependent
Length229 mmOEM dependent
ThicknessSingle-slotOEM dependent
Recommended PSU300 WOEM dependent
Power connector6 pinIntegrated laptop power
Display outputs and limits
HDMIBoard dependentOEM dependent
DisplayPortBoard dependentOEM dependent
USB Type-CNoOEM dependent
Max monitors3OEM dependent
Max resolution2560 × 1600OEM dependent
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM768 MB GDDR3OEM configuration dependent
Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Memory bus192 bitOEM configuration dependent
TFLOPS0.264OEM/TGP dependent
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 63
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (3)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (3)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: 8800 GS or Radeon 520?+
8800 GS has the higher overall gaming score, while 8800 GS offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
8800 GS is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
8800 GS is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
8800 GS offers more overall performance, while 8800 GS offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
8800 GS is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
8800 GS is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
8800 GS leads in combined 1440p performance. 8800 GS can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
8800 GS is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
8800 GS is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
8800 GS is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to 8800 GS if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.