H2H

GeForce 8800 GTS rev 2 vs Radeon RX 6750 XT

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared 8800 GTS rev 2 and RX 6750 XT across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 6750 XT outperforms 8800 GTS rev 2 by 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+28%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.
QUICK COMPARISON ANALYSIS

GeForce 8800 GTS rev 2 vs Radeon RX 6750 XT: key takeaway

The comparison of 8800 GTS rev 2 and RX 6750 XT shows a 28% advantage for RX 6750 XT in gaming performance, while 8800 GTS rev 2 may still be stronger in value for money. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
Performance
3950
Efficiency
9667
Price / performance
10091
Memory capacity
1380
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMPARISON RESULT

The devices received the same overall score

8800 GTS rev 2 leads in combined game performance. 8800 GTS rev 2 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE0%

Performance is nearly identical

PRICE DIFFERENCE$355

8800 GTS rev 2 costs less

CATALOG POSITION

Graphics card ranking

Full ranking →

The ranking is recalculated automatically from catalog data.

Positions 83–88of 317
8800 GTS rev 2#85position in the GPU ranking
RX 6750 XTnot in TOP100position in the GPU ranking
COMPARISON VERDICT

Which should you choose?

Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.

COMMUNITY CHOICE

Radeon RX 6750 XT

130 likes

Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.

$/FPSBEST PRICE / FPS

GeForce 8800 GTS rev 2

100/100 · Price $79

The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.

OVERALL SCORE

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

The Summary score section compares 8800 GTS rev 2 and RX 6750 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Category8800 GTS rev 2RX 6750 XT
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
39
50Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
34
42Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
32
40Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
96Better
67
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
61
61
FULL COMPARISON

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

The Specifications section compares 8800 GTS rev 2 and RX 6750 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Specification8800 GTS rev 2RX 6750 XT
Shader units / cores82560Better
Memory bus256 bitBetter192 bit
Memory bandwidth52 GB/s432 GB/sBetter
InterfacePCIe 2x16PCIe 4x16
Power consumption135 WBetter250 W
Process node65 nm7 nmBetter
Recommended PSU200 WBetter600 W
Length170 mmBetter267 mm
Die size86 mm²Better335 mm²
Memory cacheL2 0.02 MBBetterL1 128 KB, L2 3 MB
Transistor count210 million17200 millionBetter
Max monitorsVaries by board4
Max resolutionVaries by board7680 × 4320
USB Type-CNoNo
Device classDesktopDesktop
HDMIHDMI 2.1
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4a
DirectX10.012.2
Vulkan1.4
OpenGL3.34.6
TFLOPS0.02213.31Better
Power consumption135 WBetter250 W
Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Clock speed650 MHz2150 - 2600 MHzBetter
Base clock650 MHz2150 MHzBetter
Boost clock650 MHz2600 MHzBetter
VRAM512 MB GDDR3Better12 GB GDDR6
Memory frequency1,64 GHz18 GHzBetter
Power connector6 pin6+8 pin
Release date20072022
ArchitectureTeslaRDNA 2.0
ThicknessSingle-slotDual-slot
UpscalingFSR
Compute APIOpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1OpenCL 2.1
Launch price$79Better$549
GAME TEST BENCH

Gaming FPS

Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.

The Gaming FPS section compares 8800 GTS rev 2 and RX 6750 XT across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.

8800 GTS rev 2RX 6750 XT
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong

Black Myth: Wukong

1080p High
23 FPSEstimated 64%
25 FPSEstimated 66%
1080p Ultra
20 FPSEstimated 64%
21 FPSEstimated 66%
1440p Ultra
11 FPSEstimated 58%
16 FPSEstimated 66%
4K Ultra
5 FPSEstimated 55%
8 FPSEstimated 64%
Game1080p High1080p Ultra1440p Ultra4K Ultra
Black Myth: Wukong8800 GTS rev 223 FPSEstimated 64%RX 6750 XT25 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 220 FPSEstimated 64%RX 6750 XT21 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 211 FPSEstimated 58%RX 6750 XT16 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 25 FPSEstimated 55%RX 6750 XT8 FPSEstimated 64%
Call of Duty: Warzone8800 GTS rev 223 FPSEstimated 64%RX 6750 XT25 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 220 FPSEstimated 64%RX 6750 XT21 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 211 FPSEstimated 58%RX 6750 XT16 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 25 FPSEstimated 55%RX 6750 XT8 FPSEstimated 64%
Counter-Strike 28800 GTS rev 2194 FPSEstimated 72%RX 6750 XT211 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GTS rev 2137 FPSEstimated 72%RX 6750 XT149 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GTS rev 276 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6750 XT116 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GTS rev 229 FPSEstimated 63%RX 6750 XT51 FPSEstimated 72%
Cyberpunk 20778800 GTS rev 2125 FPSEstimated 72%RX 6750 XT136 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GTS rev 2108 FPSEstimated 72%RX 6750 XT118 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GTS rev 255 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6750 XT84 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GTS rev 219 FPSEstimated 63%RX 6750 XT34 FPSEstimated 72%
Forza Horizon 58800 GTS rev 2158 FPSEstimated 78%RX 6750 XT172 FPSEstimated 80%8800 GTS rev 2102 FPSEstimated 72%RX 6750 XT111 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GTS rev 269 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6750 XT104 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GTS rev 242 FPSEstimated 63%RX 6750 XT76 FPSEstimated 72%
God of War Ragnarök8800 GTS rev 223 FPSEstimated 64%RX 6750 XT25 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 220 FPSEstimated 64%RX 6750 XT21 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 211 FPSEstimated 58%RX 6750 XT16 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 25 FPSEstimated 55%RX 6750 XT8 FPSEstimated 64%
Hogwarts Legacy8800 GTS rev 2102 FPSEstimated 72%RX 6750 XT111 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GTS rev 286 FPSEstimated 72%RX 6750 XT93 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GTS rev 250 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6750 XT75 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GTS rev 220 FPSEstimated 63%RX 6750 XT35 FPSEstimated 72%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 20248800 GTS rev 223 FPSEstimated 64%RX 6750 XT25 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 220 FPSEstimated 64%RX 6750 XT21 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 211 FPSEstimated 58%RX 6750 XT16 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 25 FPSEstimated 55%RX 6750 XT8 FPSEstimated 64%
Monster Hunter Wilds8800 GTS rev 223 FPSEstimated 64%RX 6750 XT25 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 220 FPSEstimated 64%RX 6750 XT21 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 211 FPSEstimated 58%RX 6750 XT16 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 25 FPSEstimated 55%RX 6750 XT8 FPSEstimated 64%
Starfield8800 GTS rev 223 FPSEstimated 64%RX 6750 XT25 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 220 FPSEstimated 64%RX 6750 XT21 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 211 FPSEstimated 58%RX 6750 XT16 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 25 FPSEstimated 55%RX 6750 XT8 FPSEstimated 64%
Average FPS8800 GTS rev 272 FPSRX 6750 XT78 FPS8800 GTS rev 255 FPSRX 6750 XT60 FPS8800 GTS rev 232 FPSRX 6750 XT48 FPS8800 GTS rev 214 FPSRX 6750 XT24 FPS
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

The Benchmarks section compares 8800 GTS rev 2 and RX 6750 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Index8800 GTS rev 2RX 6750 XTDifference
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100395025%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100326061%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100325858%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1001380144%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100966736%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

The Detailed comparison section compares 8800 GTS rev 2 and RX 6750 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Index8800 GTS rev 2RX 6750 XTDifference
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100276380%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100286276%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100325858%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100246693%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100315962%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling

The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares 8800 GTS rev 2 and RX 6750 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Specifications8800 GTS rev 2RX 6750 XT
DirectX10.012.2
Vulkan1.4
OpenGL3.34.6
UpscalingFSR
Compute APIOpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1OpenCL 2.1

Architecture and release

The Architecture and release section compares 8800 GTS rev 2 and RX 6750 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Specifications8800 GTS rev 2RX 6750 XT
ArchitectureTeslaRDNA 2.0
Process node65 nm7 nmBetter
Release date20072022
Device classDesktopDesktop

GPU cores, die and clocks

The Core layout and clocks section compares 8800 GTS rev 2 and RX 6750 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Specifications8800 GTS rev 2RX 6750 XT
Transistor count210 million17200 millionBetter
Die size86 mm²Better335 mm²
Shader units / cores82560Better
Base clock650 MHz2150 MHzBetter
Boost clock650 MHz2600 MHzBetter

Board size, power and compatibility

The Form factor and compatibility section compares 8800 GTS rev 2 and RX 6750 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Specifications8800 GTS rev 2RX 6750 XT
InterfacePCIe 2x16PCIe 4x16
Length170 mmBetter267 mm
ThicknessSingle-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU200 WBetter600 W
Power connector6 pin6+8 pin

Display outputs and limits

The Display outputs section compares 8800 GTS rev 2 and RX 6750 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Specifications8800 GTS rev 2RX 6750 XT
HDMIHDMI 2.1
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitorsVaries by board4
Max resolutionVaries by board7680 × 4320

Memory and compute throughput

The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares 8800 GTS rev 2 and RX 6750 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Specifications8800 GTS rev 2RX 6750 XT
VRAM512 MB GDDR3Better12 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Memory bus256 bitBetter192 bit
TFLOPS0.02213.31Better
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER

Other comparisons

6

Reviews and questions

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device A8800 GTS rev 261
Device BRX 6750 XT61
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: 8800 GTS rev 2 or RX 6750 XT?

8800 GTS rev 2 has the higher overall gaming score, while 8800 GTS rev 2 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

8800 GTS rev 2 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

8800 GTS rev 2 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

8800 GTS rev 2 offers more overall performance, while 8800 GTS rev 2 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

8800 GTS rev 2 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

8800 GTS rev 2 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

8800 GTS rev 2 leads in combined 1440p performance. 8800 GTS rev 2 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

8800 GTS rev 2 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

8800 GTS rev 2 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

8800 GTS rev 2 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to 8800 GTS rev 2 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.