H2H

GeForce 8800 GTS rev 2 vs Radeon RX 7400

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared 8800 GTS rev 2 and RX 7400 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 7400 outperforms 8800 GTS rev 2 by 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+3%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.
QUICK COMPARISON ANALYSIS

GeForce 8800 GTS rev 2 vs Radeon RX 7400: key takeaway

The comparison of 8800 GTS rev 2 and RX 7400 shows a 3% advantage for RX 7400 in gaming performance, while 8800 GTS rev 2 may still be stronger in value for money. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
Performance
3940
Efficiency
96100
Price / performance
10088
Memory capacity
1368
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMPARISON RESULT

8800 GTS rev 2 is the best overall choice

8800 GTS rev 2 leads in combined game performance. 8800 GTS rev 2 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE2%

8800 GTS rev 2 leads in the combined performance index

PRICE DIFFERENCE$305

8800 GTS rev 2 costs less

CATALOG POSITION

Graphics card ranking

Full ranking →

The ranking is recalculated automatically from catalog data.

Positions 83–88of 317
8800 GTS rev 2#85position in the GPU ranking
RX 7400not in TOP100position in the GPU ranking
COMPARISON VERDICT

Which should you choose?

Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.

COMMUNITY CHOICE

Radeon RX 7400

94 likes

Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.

$/FPSBEST PRICE / FPS

GeForce 8800 GTS rev 2

100/100 · Price $79

The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.

OVERALL SCORE

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

The Summary score section compares 8800 GTS rev 2 and RX 7400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Category8800 GTS rev 2RX 7400
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
39
40Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
34
35Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
32
33Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
96
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
61Better
60
FULL COMPARISON

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

The Specifications section compares 8800 GTS rev 2 and RX 7400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Specification8800 GTS rev 2RX 7400
Shader units / cores81792Better
Memory bus256 bitBetter128 bit
Memory bandwidth52 GB/s173 GB/sBetter
InterfacePCIe 2x16PCIe 4x8
Power consumption135 W55 WBetter
Process node65 nm6 nmBetter
Recommended PSU200 W200 W
Length170 mmVaries by board
Die size86 mm²Better204 mm²
Memory cacheL2 0.02 MBBetterL1 128 KB, L2 2 MB
Transistor count210 million13300 millionBetter
Max monitorsVaries by board4
Max resolutionVaries by board7680 × 4320
USB Type-CNoNo
Device classDesktopDesktop
HDMIHDMI 2.1a
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.1
DirectX10.012.2
Vulkan1.4
OpenGL3.34.6
TFLOPS0.0228Better
Power consumption135 W55 WBetter
Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Clock speed650 MHz1452 - 2300 MHzBetter
Base clock650 MHz1452 MHzBetter
Boost clock650 MHz2300 MHzBetter
VRAM512 MB GDDR3Better8 GB GDDR6
Memory frequency1,64 GHz10,8 GHzBetter
Power connector6 pin1x 6-pin
Release date20072025
ArchitectureTeslaRDNA 3.0
ThicknessSingle-slotDual-slot
UpscalingFSR
Compute APIOpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1OpenCL 2.2
Launch price$79Better$299
GAME TEST BENCH

Gaming FPS

Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.

The Gaming FPS section compares 8800 GTS rev 2 and RX 7400 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.

8800 GTS rev 2RX 7400
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong

Black Myth: Wukong

1080p High
23 FPSEstimated 64%
23 FPSEstimated 66%
1080p Ultra
20 FPSEstimated 64%
20 FPSEstimated 66%
1440p Ultra
11 FPSEstimated 58%
12 FPSEstimated 61%
4K Ultra
5 FPSEstimated 55%
5 FPSEstimated 55%
Game1080p High1080p Ultra1440p Ultra4K Ultra
Black Myth: Wukong8800 GTS rev 223 FPSEstimated 64%RX 740023 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 220 FPSEstimated 64%RX 740020 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 211 FPSEstimated 58%RX 740012 FPSEstimated 61%8800 GTS rev 25 FPSEstimated 55%RX 74005 FPSEstimated 55%
Call of Duty: Warzone8800 GTS rev 223 FPSEstimated 64%RX 740023 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 220 FPSEstimated 64%RX 740020 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 211 FPSEstimated 58%RX 740012 FPSEstimated 61%8800 GTS rev 25 FPSEstimated 55%RX 74005 FPSEstimated 55%
Counter-Strike 28800 GTS rev 2194 FPSEstimated 72%RX 7400197 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GTS rev 2137 FPSEstimated 72%RX 7400139 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GTS rev 276 FPSEstimated 66%RX 740085 FPSEstimated 69%8800 GTS rev 229 FPSEstimated 63%RX 740027 FPSEstimated 63%
Cyberpunk 20778800 GTS rev 2125 FPSEstimated 72%RX 7400127 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GTS rev 2108 FPSEstimated 72%RX 7400110 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GTS rev 255 FPSEstimated 66%RX 740062 FPSEstimated 69%8800 GTS rev 219 FPSEstimated 63%RX 740018 FPSEstimated 63%
Forza Horizon 58800 GTS rev 2158 FPSEstimated 78%RX 7400161 FPSEstimated 80%8800 GTS rev 2102 FPSEstimated 72%RX 7400104 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GTS rev 269 FPSEstimated 66%RX 740077 FPSEstimated 69%8800 GTS rev 242 FPSEstimated 63%RX 740040 FPSEstimated 63%
God of War Ragnarök8800 GTS rev 223 FPSEstimated 64%RX 740023 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 220 FPSEstimated 64%RX 740020 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 211 FPSEstimated 58%RX 740012 FPSEstimated 61%8800 GTS rev 25 FPSEstimated 55%RX 74005 FPSEstimated 55%
Hogwarts Legacy8800 GTS rev 2102 FPSEstimated 72%RX 7400104 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GTS rev 286 FPSEstimated 72%RX 740087 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GTS rev 250 FPSEstimated 66%RX 740055 FPSEstimated 69%8800 GTS rev 220 FPSEstimated 63%RX 740018 FPSEstimated 63%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 20248800 GTS rev 223 FPSEstimated 64%RX 740023 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 220 FPSEstimated 64%RX 740020 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 211 FPSEstimated 58%RX 740012 FPSEstimated 61%8800 GTS rev 25 FPSEstimated 55%RX 74005 FPSEstimated 55%
Monster Hunter Wilds8800 GTS rev 223 FPSEstimated 64%RX 740023 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 220 FPSEstimated 64%RX 740020 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 211 FPSEstimated 58%RX 740012 FPSEstimated 61%8800 GTS rev 25 FPSEstimated 55%RX 74005 FPSEstimated 55%
Starfield8800 GTS rev 223 FPSEstimated 64%RX 740023 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 220 FPSEstimated 64%RX 740020 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 211 FPSEstimated 58%RX 740012 FPSEstimated 61%8800 GTS rev 25 FPSEstimated 55%RX 74005 FPSEstimated 55%
Average FPS8800 GTS rev 272 FPSRX 740073 FPS8800 GTS rev 255 FPSRX 740056 FPS8800 GTS rev 232 FPSRX 740035 FPS8800 GTS rev 214 FPSRX 740013 FPS
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

The Benchmarks section compares 8800 GTS rev 2 and RX 7400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Index8800 GTS rev 2RX 7400Difference
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10039403%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100325044%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100324840%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1001368136%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100961004%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

The Detailed comparison section compares 8800 GTS rev 2 and RX 7400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Index8800 GTS rev 2RX 7400Difference
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100275365%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100285158%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100324840%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100245680%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100314843%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling

The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares 8800 GTS rev 2 and RX 7400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Specifications8800 GTS rev 2RX 7400
DirectX10.012.2
Vulkan1.4
OpenGL3.34.6
UpscalingFSR
Compute APIOpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1OpenCL 2.2

Architecture and release

The Architecture and release section compares 8800 GTS rev 2 and RX 7400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Specifications8800 GTS rev 2RX 7400
ArchitectureTeslaRDNA 3.0
Process node65 nm6 nmBetter
Release date20072025
Device classDesktopDesktop

GPU cores, die and clocks

The Core layout and clocks section compares 8800 GTS rev 2 and RX 7400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Specifications8800 GTS rev 2RX 7400
Transistor count210 million13300 millionBetter
Die size86 mm²Better204 mm²
Shader units / cores81792Better
Base clock650 MHz1452 MHzBetter
Boost clock650 MHz2300 MHzBetter

Board size, power and compatibility

The Form factor and compatibility section compares 8800 GTS rev 2 and RX 7400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Specifications8800 GTS rev 2RX 7400
InterfacePCIe 2x16PCIe 4x8
Length170 mmVaries by board
ThicknessSingle-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU200 W200 W
Power connector6 pin1x 6-pin

Display outputs and limits

The Display outputs section compares 8800 GTS rev 2 and RX 7400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Specifications8800 GTS rev 2RX 7400
HDMIHDMI 2.1a
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.1
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitorsVaries by board4
Max resolutionVaries by board7680 × 4320

Memory and compute throughput

The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares 8800 GTS rev 2 and RX 7400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Specifications8800 GTS rev 2RX 7400
VRAM512 MB GDDR3Better8 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Memory bus256 bitBetter128 bit
TFLOPS0.0228Better
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER

Other comparisons

6

Reviews and questions

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device A8800 GTS rev 261
Device BRX 740060
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: 8800 GTS rev 2 or RX 7400?

8800 GTS rev 2 has the higher overall gaming score, while 8800 GTS rev 2 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

8800 GTS rev 2 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

8800 GTS rev 2 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

8800 GTS rev 2 offers more overall performance, while 8800 GTS rev 2 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

8800 GTS rev 2 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

8800 GTS rev 2 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

8800 GTS rev 2 leads in combined 1440p performance. 8800 GTS rev 2 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

8800 GTS rev 2 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

RX 7400 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

RX 7400 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to 8800 GTS rev 2 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.