NVIDIA
GeForce 8800 GTX vs ATI Radeon HD 4770
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
ATI Radeon HD 4770
Aggregate performance score
We've compared 8800 GTX and ATI Radeon HD 4770 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗8800 GTX outperforms ATI Radeon HD 4770 by 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+10%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.GeForce 8800 GTX vs ATI Radeon HD 4770: key takeaway
The comparison of 8800 GTX and ATI Radeon HD 4770 shows a 10% advantage for 8800 GTX in gaming performance, while ATI Radeon HD 4770 may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIA
AMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
4339
92100
100100
1713
COMPARISON RESULT
8800 GTX is the best overall choice
8800 GTX leads in combined game performance. 8800 GTX offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
8800 GTX leads in the combined performance index
8800 GTX costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 55–60of 319
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
ATI Radeon HD 4770
155 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce 8800 GTX
100/100 · Price $79The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares 8800 GTX and ATI Radeon HD 4770 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
43Better
39
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
37Better
34
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
35Better
32
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
92
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
63Better
62
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares 8800 GTX and ATI Radeon HD 4770 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Device classDesktopDesktop
DirectX10.010.1
OpenGL3.33.3
TFLOPS0.3460.96Better
Power consumption155 W80 WBetter
Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Power connector6+6 pin6 pin
Release date20062009
ArchitectureTeslaTeraScale
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Compute APIOpenCL 1.0, CUDA 1.0OpenCL 1.1
Launch price$79Better$119
Shader units / cores128640Better
Clock speed576 MHz750 MHzBetter
Base clock576 MHz750 MHzBetter
Boost clock576 MHz750 MHzBetter
VRAM768 MB GDDR3Better512 MB GDDR5
Memory frequency1,8 GHz3,2 GHzBetter
Memory bus384 bitBetter128 bit
Memory bandwidth86 GB/sBetter51 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 1x16PCIe 2x16
Power consumption155 W80 WBetter
Process node90 nm40 nmBetter
Recommended PSU450 W250 WBetter
Length270 mm203 mmBetter
Die size484 mm²137 mm²Better
Memory cacheL2 0.1 MBBetterL1 16 KB, L2 0.13 MB
Transistor count681 million826 millionBetter
Max monitors33
Max resolution2560 × 16002560 × 1600
USB Type-CNoNo
VulkanNot supportedNot supported
DisplayPortBoard dependentBoard dependent
HDMIBoard dependentBoard dependent
UpscalingNot supportedNot supported
GAME TEST BENCH
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares 8800 GTX and ATI Radeon HD 4770 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
8800 GTXATI Radeon HD 4770
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong
1080p High
26 FPSEstimated 64%
24 FPSEstimated 64%
1080p Ultra
22 FPSEstimated 64%
20 FPSEstimated 64%
1440p Ultra
12 FPSEstimated 58%
10 FPSEstimated 58%
4K Ultra
5 FPSEstimated 55%
5 FPSEstimated 55%
Black Myth: Wukong8800 GTX26 FPSEstimated 64%ATI Radeon HD 477024 FPSEstimated 64%8800 GTX22 FPSEstimated 64%ATI Radeon HD 477020 FPSEstimated 64%8800 GTX12 FPSEstimated 58%ATI Radeon HD 477010 FPSEstimated 58%8800 GTX5 FPSEstimated 55%ATI Radeon HD 47705 FPSEstimated 55%
Call of Duty: Warzone8800 GTX26 FPSEstimated 64%ATI Radeon HD 477024 FPSEstimated 64%8800 GTX22 FPSEstimated 64%ATI Radeon HD 477020 FPSEstimated 64%8800 GTX12 FPSEstimated 58%ATI Radeon HD 477010 FPSEstimated 58%8800 GTX5 FPSEstimated 55%ATI Radeon HD 47705 FPSEstimated 55%
Counter-Strike 28800 GTX216 FPSEstimated 72%ATI Radeon HD 4770198 FPSEstimated 72%8800 GTX152 FPSEstimated 72%ATI Radeon HD 4770139 FPSEstimated 72%8800 GTX85 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 477075 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTX32 FPSEstimated 63%ATI Radeon HD 477027 FPSEstimated 62%
Cyberpunk 20778800 GTX140 FPSEstimated 72%ATI Radeon HD 4770128 FPSEstimated 72%8800 GTX120 FPSEstimated 72%ATI Radeon HD 4770110 FPSEstimated 72%8800 GTX62 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 477054 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTX22 FPSEstimated 63%ATI Radeon HD 477018 FPSEstimated 62%
Forza Horizon 58800 GTX176 FPSEstimated 78%ATI Radeon HD 4770161 FPSEstimated 78%8800 GTX114 FPSEstimated 72%ATI Radeon HD 4770104 FPSEstimated 72%8800 GTX77 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 477067 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTX47 FPSEstimated 63%ATI Radeon HD 477040 FPSEstimated 62%
God of War Ragnarök8800 GTX26 FPSEstimated 64%ATI Radeon HD 477024 FPSEstimated 64%8800 GTX22 FPSEstimated 64%ATI Radeon HD 477020 FPSEstimated 64%8800 GTX12 FPSEstimated 58%ATI Radeon HD 477010 FPSEstimated 58%8800 GTX5 FPSEstimated 55%ATI Radeon HD 47705 FPSEstimated 55%
Hogwarts Legacy8800 GTX114 FPSEstimated 72%ATI Radeon HD 4770104 FPSEstimated 72%8800 GTX95 FPSEstimated 72%ATI Radeon HD 477087 FPSEstimated 72%8800 GTX55 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 477049 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTX22 FPSEstimated 63%ATI Radeon HD 477018 FPSEstimated 62%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 20248800 GTX26 FPSEstimated 64%ATI Radeon HD 477024 FPSEstimated 64%8800 GTX22 FPSEstimated 64%ATI Radeon HD 477020 FPSEstimated 64%8800 GTX12 FPSEstimated 58%ATI Radeon HD 477010 FPSEstimated 58%8800 GTX5 FPSEstimated 55%ATI Radeon HD 47705 FPSEstimated 55%
Monster Hunter Wilds8800 GTX26 FPSEstimated 64%ATI Radeon HD 477024 FPSEstimated 64%8800 GTX22 FPSEstimated 64%ATI Radeon HD 477020 FPSEstimated 64%8800 GTX12 FPSEstimated 58%ATI Radeon HD 477010 FPSEstimated 58%8800 GTX5 FPSEstimated 55%ATI Radeon HD 47705 FPSEstimated 55%
Starfield8800 GTX26 FPSEstimated 64%ATI Radeon HD 477024 FPSEstimated 64%8800 GTX22 FPSEstimated 64%ATI Radeon HD 477020 FPSEstimated 64%8800 GTX12 FPSEstimated 58%ATI Radeon HD 477010 FPSEstimated 58%8800 GTX5 FPSEstimated 55%ATI Radeon HD 47705 FPSEstimated 55%
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares 8800 GTX and ATI Radeon HD 4770 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100433910%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10036339%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100363212%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100171327%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100921008%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares 8800 GTX and ATI Radeon HD 4770 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100312714%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100332816%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100363212%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100292419%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100353112%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares 8800 GTX and ATI Radeon HD 4770 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DirectX10.010.1
VulkanNot supportedNot supported
OpenGL3.33.3
UpscalingNot supportedNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 1.0, CUDA 1.0OpenCL 1.1
Architecture and release
The Architecture and release section compares 8800 GTX and ATI Radeon HD 4770 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
ArchitectureTeslaTeraScale
Process node90 nm40 nmBetter
Release date20062009
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
The Core layout and clocks section compares 8800 GTX and ATI Radeon HD 4770 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Transistor count681 million826 millionBetter
Die size484 mm²137 mm²Better
Shader units / cores128640Better
Base clock576 MHz750 MHzBetter
Boost clock576 MHz750 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
The Form factor and compatibility section compares 8800 GTX and ATI Radeon HD 4770 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
InterfacePCIe 1x16PCIe 2x16
Length270 mm203 mmBetter
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU450 W250 WBetter
Power connector6+6 pin6 pin
Display outputs and limits
The Display outputs section compares 8800 GTX and ATI Radeon HD 4770 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
HDMIBoard dependentBoard dependent
DisplayPortBoard dependentBoard dependent
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors33
Max resolution2560 × 16002560 × 1600
Memory and compute throughput
The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares 8800 GTX and ATI Radeon HD 4770 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
VRAM768 MB GDDR3Better512 MB GDDR5
Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Memory bus384 bitBetter128 bit
TFLOPS0.3460.96Better
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
Arc A310IntelReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: 8800 GTX or ATI Radeon HD 4770?+
8800 GTX has the higher overall gaming score, while 8800 GTX offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
8800 GTX is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
8800 GTX is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
8800 GTX offers more overall performance, while 8800 GTX offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
8800 GTX is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
8800 GTX is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
8800 GTX leads in combined 1440p performance. 8800 GTX can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
8800 GTX is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
ATI Radeon HD 4770 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
ATI Radeon HD 4770 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to 8800 GTX if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.