NVIDIA
GeForce 9300 GE vs GeForce MX110
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GeForce MX110
Aggregate performance score
We've compared 9300 GE and GeForce MX110 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗9300 GE outperforms GeForce MX110 by ~27% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+27%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce 9300 GE (~36%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider 9300 GE
- Higher catalog performance index
- Lower stated power consumption
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1 · Not supported
Reasons to consider GeForce MX110
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 5.0 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3830
100100
10054
756
Graphics card ranking
Positions 207–212of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce MX110
149 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
38Better
30
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
34Better
28
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
31Better
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
57Better
42
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Recommended PSU
Thickness
Compute API
Launch price—
Shader units / coresBetter
Die sizeBetter
Memory cacheBetter
Transistor countBetter
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Device class
DirectX
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Max monitors
Length
Architecture
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory bus
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
HDMI
Vulkan
Upscaling
DisplayPort
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares 9300 GE and GeForce MX110 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
9300 GEGeForce MX110
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
182 FPS
153 FPS
1080p Ultra
128 FPS
108 FPS
1440p Ultra
79 FPS
58 FPS
4K Ultra
30 FPS
21 FPS
Counter-Strike 29300 GE182 FPSGeForce MX110153 FPS9300 GE128 FPSGeForce MX110108 FPS9300 GE79 FPSGeForce MX11058 FPS9300 GE30 FPSGeForce MX11021 FPS
Cyberpunk 20779300 GE118 FPSGeForce MX11099 FPS9300 GE101 FPSGeForce MX11085 FPS9300 GE57 FPSGeForce MX11042 FPS9300 GE20 FPSGeForce MX11014 FPS
Forza Horizon 59300 GE148 FPSGeForce MX110125 FPS9300 GE96 FPSGeForce MX11081 FPS9300 GE71 FPSGeForce MX11052 FPS9300 GE44 FPSGeForce MX11031 FPS
Hogwarts Legacy9300 GE96 FPSGeForce MX11081 FPS9300 GE80 FPSGeForce MX11068 FPS9300 GE51 FPSGeForce MX11037 FPS9300 GE20 FPSGeForce MX11014 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100383024%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100303413%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100293724%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100756156%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100244255%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100264042%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100293724%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100214471%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100293827%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX10.011.0
VulkanNot supported1.4
OpenGL3.34.6
UpscalingNot supportedNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 5.0
Architecture and release
ArchitectureTeslaPascal / Turing / Ampere
Process node65 nm28 nmBetter
Release date20082017
Device classDesktopMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count210 million1020 millionBetter
Die size80 mm²77 mm²Better
Shader units / cores8256Better
Base clock540 MHz978 MHzBetter
Boost clock540 MHz1006 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 2x16PCIe 3.0 x4
LengthVaries by boardOEM dependent
ThicknessSingle-slotIGP
Recommended PSU200 WOEM dependent
Power connectorNoneNone
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMIOEM dependent
DisplayPortBoard dependentOEM dependent
USB Type-CNoOEM dependent
Max monitors3OEM dependent
Max resolution2560 × 1600Depends on host system
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM256 MB DDR2Better2 GB GDDR5
Memory typeDDR2GDDR5 / GDDR6
Memory bus64 bit64 bit
TFLOPS0.0210.515Better
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 69
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (3)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (3)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: 9300 GE or GeForce MX110?+
9300 GE has the higher overall gaming score, while 9300 GE offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
9300 GE is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
9300 GE is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
9300 GE offers more overall performance, while 9300 GE offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
9300 GE is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
9300 GE is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
9300 GE leads in combined 1440p performance. 9300 GE can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
9300 GE is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
9300 GE is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
9300 GE is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to 9300 GE if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.