NVIDIA
GeForce 9600 GT vs Radeon R7 360
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
R7 360
Aggregate performance score
We've compared 9600 GT and R7 360 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗R7 360 outperforms 9600 GT by ~3% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+3%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Equal catalog scores
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider 9600 GT
- Lower stated power consumption
- Lower recorded market price
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1 · Not supported
Reasons to consider R7 360
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.1 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIA
AMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3132
100100
100100
4356
Graphics card ranking
Positions 128–133of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce 9600 GT
113 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon R7 360
Price $26.00Based on catalog performance per unit of current market price, not measured FPS.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
31
32Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
29
29
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
26
27Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
52
52
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Device class
DirectX
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Clock speedBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
Launch priceBetter
Shader units / coresBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSUBetter
LengthBetter
Die sizeBetter
Memory cacheBetter
Transistor countBetter
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Vulkan
DisplayPort
HDMI
Upscaling
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares 9600 GT and R7 360 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
9600 GTR7 360
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
152 FPS
160 FPS
1080p Ultra
107 FPS
111 FPS
1440p Ultra
60 FPS
61 FPS
4K Ultra
23 FPS
21 FPS
Counter-Strike 29600 GT152 FPSR7 360160 FPS9600 GT107 FPSR7 360111 FPS9600 GT60 FPSR7 36061 FPS9600 GT23 FPSR7 36021 FPS
Cyberpunk 20779600 GT98 FPSR7 360104 FPS9600 GT85 FPSR7 36088 FPS9600 GT43 FPSR7 36044 FPS9600 GT15 FPSR7 36014 FPS
Forza Horizon 59600 GT124 FPSR7 360131 FPS9600 GT80 FPSR7 36083 FPS9600 GT54 FPSR7 36055 FPS9600 GT33 FPSR7 36032 FPS
Hogwarts Legacy9600 GT80 FPSR7 36085 FPS9600 GT67 FPSR7 36070 FPS9600 GT39 FPSR7 36040 FPS9600 GT15 FPSR7 36015 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10031323%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100313615%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100343914%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100435626%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100364318%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100364113%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100343914%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100384517%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100353911%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX10.012.0
VulkanNot supported1.2
OpenGL3.34.6
UpscalingNot supportedNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1OpenCL 2.1
Architecture and release
ArchitectureTeslaGCN 2.0
Process node65 nm28 nmBetter
Release date20082015
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count505 million2080 millionBetter
Die size240 mm²160 mm²Better
Shader units / cores64768Better
Base clock650 MHz1050 MHzBetter
Boost clock650 MHz1050 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 2x16PCIe 3x16
Length229 mm165 mmBetter
ThicknessSingle-slotSingle-slot
Recommended PSU250 WBetter300 W
Power connector6 pin6 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIBoard dependentHDMI 1.4a
DisplayPortBoard dependentDisplayPort 1.2
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors33
Max resolution2560 × 16004096 × 2160
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM1 GB GDDR32 GB GDDR5Better
Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Memory bus256 bitBetter128 bit
TFLOPS0.2081.613Better
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 70
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (6)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (4)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: 9600 GT or R7 360?+
9600 GT has the higher overall gaming score, while 9600 GT offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
9600 GT is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
9600 GT is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
9600 GT offers more overall performance, while 9600 GT offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
9600 GT is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
9600 GT is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
9600 GT leads in combined 1440p performance. 9600 GT can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
9600 GT is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
9600 GT is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
9600 GT is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to 9600 GT if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.