NVIDIA
GeForce 9800 GT vs Radeon RX 6900 XT
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
RX 6900 XT
Aggregate performance score
We've compared 9800 GT and RX 6900 XT across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RX 6900 XT outperforms 9800 GT by ~46% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+46%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce 9800 GT (~6%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider 9800 GT
- Lower stated power consumption
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1 · Not supported
Reasons to consider RX 6900 XT
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.1 · FSR
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIA
AMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3957
10063
10058
1388
Graphics card ranking
Positions 52–57of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 6900 XT
133 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce 9800 GT
Price $35.00Based on catalog performance per unit of current market price, not measured FPS.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
39
57Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
34
47Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
32
45Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
63
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
57Better
54
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Device class
DirectX
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Architecture
Max monitors
Thickness
Compute API
Launch priceBetter
Shader units / coresBetter
Interface
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory bus
Memory bandwidthBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSUBetter
LengthBetter
Die sizeBetter
Memory cacheBetter
Transistor countBetter
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Upscaling
Vulkan
DisplayPort
HDMI
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares 9800 GT and RX 6900 XT across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
9800 GTRX 6900 XT
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
195 FPS
233 FPS
1080p Ultra
137 FPS
164 FPS
1440p Ultra
77 FPS
127 FPS
4K Ultra
29 FPS
63 FPS
Counter-Strike 29800 GT195 FPSRX 6900 XT233 FPS9800 GT137 FPSRX 6900 XT164 FPS9800 GT77 FPSRX 6900 XT127 FPS9800 GT29 FPSRX 6900 XT63 FPS
Cyberpunk 20779800 GT126 FPSRX 6900 XT150 FPS9800 GT108 FPSRX 6900 XT129 FPS9800 GT56 FPSRX 6900 XT92 FPS9800 GT19 FPSRX 6900 XT42 FPS
Forza Horizon 59800 GT159 FPSRX 6900 XT189 FPS9800 GT103 FPSRX 6900 XT123 FPS9800 GT69 FPSRX 6900 XT114 FPS9800 GT43 FPSRX 6900 XT93 FPS
Hogwarts Legacy9800 GT103 FPSRX 6900 XT123 FPS9800 GT86 FPSRX 6900 XT103 FPS9800 GT50 FPSRX 6900 XT83 FPS9800 GT20 FPSRX 6900 XT43 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100395738%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100326467%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100326669%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1001388149%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001006345%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100277190%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100286985%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100326669%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 1002474102%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100316672%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX10.012.2
VulkanNot supported1.4
OpenGL3.34.6
UpscalingNot supportedFSR
Compute APIOpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1OpenCL 2.1
Architecture and release
ArchitectureTeslaRDNA 2.0
Process node65 nm7 nmBetter
Release date20082020
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count754 million26800 millionBetter
Die size324 mm²Better520 mm²
Shader units / cores1125120Better
Base clock600 MHz1825 MHzBetter
Boost clock600 MHz2250 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 2x16PCIe 4x16
Length229 mmBetter267 mm
ThicknessSingle-slotTriple-slot
Recommended PSU300 WBetter700 W
Power connector6 pin8+8 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIBoard dependentHDMI 2.1
DisplayPortBoard dependentDisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoYes
Max monitors34
Max resolution2560 × 16007680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM512 MB GDDR3Better16 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Memory bus256 bit256 bit
TFLOPS0.33623.04Better
Other comparisons
Arc A380IntelReviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 70
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (5)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (5)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record changed: product_prices
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: 9800 GT or RX 6900 XT?+
9800 GT has the higher overall gaming score, while 9800 GT offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
9800 GT is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
9800 GT is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
9800 GT offers more overall performance, while 9800 GT offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
9800 GT is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
9800 GT is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
9800 GT leads in combined 1440p performance. 9800 GT can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
9800 GT is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
9800 GT is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
9800 GT is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to 9800 GT if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.