AMD
AMD Radeon Pro W7700 vs GeForce 910M
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GeForce 910M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon Pro W7700 and GeForce 910M across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Radeon Pro W7700 outperforms GeForce 910M by ~83% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+83%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 16Price record updated: Sep 15, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: AMD Radeon Pro W7700 (~83%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider Radeon Pro W7700
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.0 / DirectCompute 5.0
Reasons to consider GeForce 910M
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 3.5 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMD
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
7630
100100
6954
8843
Graphics card ranking
Positions 6–11of 30
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce 910M
174 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
76Better
30
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
61Better
28
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
59Better
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
77Better
42
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DisplayPort
HDMI
Interface
Memory busBetter
Memory type
Architecture
Device class
Process nodeBetter
Release date
VRAMBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Vulkan
Compute API
Power connector
TFLOPSBetter
Launch price——
Max resolution—
Max monitors—
USB Type-C—
Recommended PSU—
DirectX—
OpenGL—
Power consumption—
Shader units / cores—
Thickness—
Length—
Die size—
Memory cache—
Clock speed—
Base clock—
Boost clock—
Memory frequency—
Memory bandwidth—
Transistor count—
Upscaling—
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares Radeon Pro W7700 and GeForce 910M across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
Radeon Pro W7700GeForce 910M
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
—
152 FPS
1080p Ultra
—
107 FPS
1440p Ultra
—
57 FPS
4K Ultra
—
21 FPS
Counter-Strike 2Radeon Pro W7700—GeForce 910M152 FPSRadeon Pro W7700—GeForce 910M107 FPSRadeon Pro W7700—GeForce 910M57 FPSRadeon Pro W7700—GeForce 910M21 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077Radeon Pro W7700—GeForce 910M98 FPSRadeon Pro W7700—GeForce 910M84 FPSRadeon Pro W7700—GeForce 910M41 FPSRadeon Pro W7700—GeForce 910M14 FPS
Forza Horizon 5Radeon Pro W7700—GeForce 910M124 FPSRadeon Pro W7700—GeForce 910M80 FPSRadeon Pro W7700—GeForce 910M51 FPSRadeon Pro W7700—GeForce 910M30 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRadeon Pro W7700—GeForce 910M80 FPSRadeon Pro W7700—GeForce 910M67 FPSRadeon Pro W7700—GeForce 910M37 FPSRadeon Pro W7700—GeForce 910M14 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100763087%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100783186%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100793480%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100884369%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100813677%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100813579%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100793480%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100833777%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100803481%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX—11.0
VulkanVulkan 1.31.2
OpenGL—4.6
Upscaling—Not supported
Compute APIOpenCL 2.0 / DirectCompute 5.0OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 3.5
Architecture and release
ArchitectureRDNA 3Maxwell
Process node5 nm / 6 nmBetter28 nm
Release date20232015
Device classProfMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count—1020 million
Die size—87 mm²
Shader units / cores—384
Base clock—641 MHz
Boost clock—641 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length—OEM dependent
Thickness—IGP
Recommended PSU—OEM dependent
Power connector2x 8-pinNone
Display outputs and limits
HDMINoOEM dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.1OEM dependent
USB Type-C—OEM dependent
Max monitors—OEM dependent
Max resolution—Depends on host system
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM16 GBBetter2 GB DDR3
Memory typeGDDR6 ECCGDDR5 / DDR3
Memory bus256-bitBetter64 bit
TFLOPS28.5Better0.492
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 16
- Specifications
- 0 / 49
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (3)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (3)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Radeon Pro W7700 or GeForce 910M?+
Radeon Pro W7700 has the higher overall gaming score, while Radeon Pro W7700 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GeForce 910M is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GeForce 910M is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Radeon Pro W7700 offers more overall performance, while Radeon Pro W7700 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GeForce 910M is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Radeon Pro W7700 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Radeon Pro W7700 leads in combined 1440p performance. Radeon Pro W7700 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Radeon Pro W7700 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GeForce 910M is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GeForce 910M is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Radeon Pro W7700 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.