AMD
AMD Radeon Pro W7900 vs Intel Arc A770
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
Intel
Arc A770
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon Pro W7900 and Arc A770 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Radeon Pro W7900 outperforms Arc A770 by ~20% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+20%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 16Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: AMD Radeon Pro W7900 (~20%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider Radeon Pro W7900
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.0 / DirectCompute 5.0
Reasons to consider Arc A770
- Lower stated power consumption
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 · XeSS
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMD
IntelPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
8655
9781
3794
10088
Graphics card ranking
Positions 7–12of 30
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
AMD Radeon Pro W7900
136 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
86Better
55
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
68Better
46
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
66Better
44
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
97Better
81
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
77Better
64
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DisplayPort
HDMI
Interface
Memory busBetter
Memory type
Architecture
Device class
Process nodeBetter
Release date
VRAMBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Vulkan
Compute API
Power connector
TFLOPSBetter
DirectX—
OpenGL—
Power consumption—
Memory cache—
Upscaling—
Clock speed—
Base clock—
Boost clock—
Memory frequency—
Memory bandwidth—
Thickness—
Launch price—
Shader units / cores—
Recommended PSU—
Die size—
Transistor count—
Max monitors—
Max resolution—
Length—
USB Type-C—
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares Radeon Pro W7900 and Arc A770 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
Radeon Pro W7900Arc A770
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
—
228 FPS
1080p Ultra
—
160 FPS
1440p Ultra
—
125 FPS
4K Ultra
—
62 FPS
Counter-Strike 2Radeon Pro W7900—Arc A770228 FPSRadeon Pro W7900—Arc A770160 FPSRadeon Pro W7900—Arc A770125 FPSRadeon Pro W7900—Arc A77062 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077Radeon Pro W7900—Arc A770147 FPSRadeon Pro W7900—Arc A770127 FPSRadeon Pro W7900—Arc A77090 FPSRadeon Pro W7900—Arc A77042 FPS
Forza Horizon 5Radeon Pro W7900—Arc A770186 FPSRadeon Pro W7900—Arc A770120 FPSRadeon Pro W7900—Arc A770112 FPSRadeon Pro W7900—Arc A77091 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRadeon Pro W7900—Arc A770120 FPSRadeon Pro W7900—Arc A770101 FPSRadeon Pro W7900—Arc A77081 FPSRadeon Pro W7900—Arc A77042 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100865544%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100886432%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100906434%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1001008813%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100978118%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100927027%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100926830%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100906434%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100947325%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100906532%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX—12.2
VulkanVulkan 1.31.4
OpenGL—4.6
Upscaling—XeSS
Compute APIOpenCL 2.0 / DirectCompute 5.0OpenCL 3.0
Architecture and release
ArchitectureRDNA 3Xe-HPG
Process node5 nm / 6 nmBetter6 nm
Release date20232022
Device classProfDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count—21700 million
Die size—406 mm²
Shader units / cores—4096
Base clock—2100 MHz
Boost clock—2400 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4x16
Length—Varies by board
Thickness—Dual-slot
Recommended PSU—550 W
Power connector2x 8-pin8+8 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMINoHDMI 2.1
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.1DisplayPort 2.0
USB Type-C—No
Max monitors—4
Max resolution—7680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM48 GBBetter16 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6 ECCGDDR6
Memory bus384-bitBetter256 bit
TFLOPS61.3Better19.66
Other comparisons
RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6XNVIDIAReviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 16
- Specifications
- 0 / 50
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (5)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (1)
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Radeon Pro W7900 or Arc A770?+
Radeon Pro W7900 has the higher overall gaming score, while Arc A770 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Radeon Pro W7900 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Radeon Pro W7900 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Radeon Pro W7900 offers more overall performance, while Radeon Pro W7900 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Radeon Pro W7900 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Arc A770 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Radeon Pro W7900 leads in combined 1440p performance. Radeon Pro W7900 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Radeon Pro W7900 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Arc A770 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Arc A770 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Radeon Pro W7900 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.