Intel
Intel Arc A380 vs ATI Radeon HD 3690
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
ATI Radeon HD 3690
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Arc A380 and ATI Radeon HD 3690 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Arc A380 outperforms ATI Radeon HD 3690 by 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+3%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.Intel Arc A380 vs ATI Radeon HD 3690: key takeaway
The comparison of Arc A380 and ATI Radeon HD 3690 shows a 3% advantage for Arc A380 in gaming performance, while ATI Radeon HD 3690 may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
Intel
AMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3635
100100
100100
607
COMPARISON RESULT
The devices received the same overall score
Arc A380 leads in combined game performance. Arc A380 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Performance is nearly identical
ATI Radeon HD 3690 costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 112–117of 319
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Intel Arc A380
92 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
ATI Radeon HD 3690
100/100 · Price $119The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares Arc A380 and ATI Radeon HD 3690 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
36Better
35
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
32
32
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
30Better
29
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
60
60
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares Arc A380 and ATI Radeon HD 3690 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.0Board dependent
HDMIHDMI 2.1Board dependent
Device classDesktopDesktop
UpscalingXeSSNot supported
DirectX12.210.1
Vulkan1.4Not supported
OpenGL4.63.3
TFLOPS4.198Better0.429
Power consumption75 W75 W
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Power connector6 pin6 pin
Release date20222008
ArchitectureXe-HPGTeraScale
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 1.x
Launch price$139$119Better
Shader units / cores1024Better320
Clock speed300 - 2000 MHz670 MHzBetter
Base clock300 MHz670 MHzBetter
Boost clock2000 MHzBetter670 MHz
VRAM6 GB GDDR6256 MB GDDR3Better
Memory frequency15,5 GHzBetter1,66 GHz
Memory bus96 bit128 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth186 GB/sBetter27 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 4x8PCIe 2x16
Power consumption75 W75 W
Process node6 nmBetter55 nm
Recommended PSU250 W250 W
Length222 mmVaries by board
Die size157 mm²Better192 mm²
Memory cacheL2 4 MBL2 0.13 MB
Transistor count7200 millionBetter666 million
Max monitors43
Max resolution7680 × 43202560 × 1600
USB Type-CNoNo
GAME TEST BENCH
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares Arc A380 and ATI Radeon HD 3690 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
Arc A380ATI Radeon HD 3690
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong
1080p High
22 FPSEstimated 66%
21 FPSEstimated 64%
1080p Ultra
19 FPSEstimated 66%
18 FPSEstimated 64%
1440p Ultra
10 FPSEstimated 59%
9 FPSEstimated 58%
4K Ultra
5 FPSEstimated 55%
5 FPSEstimated 55%
Black Myth: WukongArc A38022 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 369021 FPSEstimated 64%Arc A38019 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 369018 FPSEstimated 64%Arc A38010 FPSEstimated 59%ATI Radeon HD 36909 FPSEstimated 58%Arc A3805 FPSEstimated 55%ATI Radeon HD 36905 FPSEstimated 55%
Call of Duty: WarzoneArc A38022 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 369021 FPSEstimated 64%Arc A38019 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 369018 FPSEstimated 64%Arc A38010 FPSEstimated 59%ATI Radeon HD 36909 FPSEstimated 58%Arc A3805 FPSEstimated 55%ATI Radeon HD 36905 FPSEstimated 55%
Counter-Strike 2Arc A380188 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 3690175 FPSEstimated 72%Arc A380129 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 3690123 FPSEstimated 72%Arc A38069 FPSEstimated 67%ATI Radeon HD 369066 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A38023 FPSEstimated 62%ATI Radeon HD 369024 FPSEstimated 62%
Cyberpunk 2077Arc A380121 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 3690113 FPSEstimated 72%Arc A380102 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 369097 FPSEstimated 72%Arc A38050 FPSEstimated 67%ATI Radeon HD 369048 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A38015 FPSEstimated 62%ATI Radeon HD 369016 FPSEstimated 62%
Forza Horizon 5Arc A380153 FPSEstimated 80%ATI Radeon HD 3690142 FPSEstimated 78%Arc A38097 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 369092 FPSEstimated 72%Arc A38062 FPSEstimated 67%ATI Radeon HD 369060 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A38034 FPSEstimated 62%ATI Radeon HD 369035 FPSEstimated 62%
God of War RagnarökArc A38022 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 369021 FPSEstimated 64%Arc A38019 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 369018 FPSEstimated 64%Arc A38010 FPSEstimated 59%ATI Radeon HD 36909 FPSEstimated 58%Arc A3805 FPSEstimated 55%ATI Radeon HD 36905 FPSEstimated 55%
Hogwarts LegacyArc A38099 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 369092 FPSEstimated 72%Arc A38081 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 369077 FPSEstimated 72%Arc A38045 FPSEstimated 67%ATI Radeon HD 369043 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A38016 FPSEstimated 62%ATI Radeon HD 369016 FPSEstimated 62%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024Arc A38022 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 369021 FPSEstimated 64%Arc A38019 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 369018 FPSEstimated 64%Arc A38010 FPSEstimated 59%ATI Radeon HD 36909 FPSEstimated 58%Arc A3805 FPSEstimated 55%ATI Radeon HD 36905 FPSEstimated 55%
Monster Hunter WildsArc A38022 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 369021 FPSEstimated 64%Arc A38019 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 369018 FPSEstimated 64%Arc A38010 FPSEstimated 59%ATI Radeon HD 36909 FPSEstimated 58%Arc A3805 FPSEstimated 55%ATI Radeon HD 36905 FPSEstimated 55%
StarfieldArc A38022 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 369021 FPSEstimated 64%Arc A38019 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 369018 FPSEstimated 64%Arc A38010 FPSEstimated 59%ATI Radeon HD 36909 FPSEstimated 58%Arc A3805 FPSEstimated 55%ATI Radeon HD 36905 FPSEstimated 55%
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares Arc A380 and ATI Radeon HD 3690 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10036353%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100442941%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100432746%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100607158%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares Arc A380 and ATI Radeon HD 3690 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100472272%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100462463%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100432746%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100492084%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100432746%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares Arc A380 and ATI Radeon HD 3690 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DirectX12.210.1
Vulkan1.4Not supported
OpenGL4.63.3
UpscalingXeSSNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 1.x
Architecture and release
The Architecture and release section compares Arc A380 and ATI Radeon HD 3690 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
ArchitectureXe-HPGTeraScale
Process node6 nmBetter55 nm
Release date20222008
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
The Core layout and clocks section compares Arc A380 and ATI Radeon HD 3690 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Transistor count7200 millionBetter666 million
Die size157 mm²Better192 mm²
Shader units / cores1024Better320
Base clock300 MHz670 MHzBetter
Boost clock2000 MHzBetter670 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
The Form factor and compatibility section compares Arc A380 and ATI Radeon HD 3690 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
InterfacePCIe 4x8PCIe 2x16
Length222 mmVaries by board
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU250 W250 W
Power connector6 pin6 pin
Display outputs and limits
The Display outputs section compares Arc A380 and ATI Radeon HD 3690 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
HDMIHDMI 2.1Board dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.0Board dependent
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors43
Max resolution7680 × 43202560 × 1600
Memory and compute throughput
The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares Arc A380 and ATI Radeon HD 3690 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
VRAM6 GB GDDR6256 MB GDDR3Better
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Memory bus96 bit128 bitBetter
TFLOPS4.198Better0.429
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
GTX 1050 3GBNVIDIAReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Arc A380 or ATI Radeon HD 3690?+
Arc A380 has the higher overall gaming score, while Arc A380 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Arc A380 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Arc A380 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Arc A380 offers more overall performance, while Arc A380 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Arc A380 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Arc A380 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Arc A380 leads in combined 1440p performance. Arc A380 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Arc A380 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Arc A380 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Arc A380 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Arc A380 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.