Intel
Intel Arc A380 vs GeForce GTX 1050
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GTX 1050
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Arc A380 and GTX 1050 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Arc A380 outperforms GTX 1050 by 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+13%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.Intel Arc A380 vs GeForce GTX 1050: key takeaway
The comparison of Arc A380 and GTX 1050 shows a 13% advantage for Arc A380 in gaming performance, while GTX 1050 may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
Intel
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3632
100100
100100
6056
COMPARISON RESULT
Arc A380 is the best overall choice
Arc A380 leads in combined game performance. Arc A380 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Arc A380 leads in the combined performance index
GTX 1050 costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 134–139of 317
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce GTX 1050
154 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce GTX 1050
100/100 · Price $119The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares Arc A380 and GTX 1050 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
36Better
32
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
32Better
29
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
30Better
27
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
60Better
58
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares Arc A380 and GTX 1050 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.0DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.0
Device classDesktopDesktop
UpscalingXeSS—
DirectX12.212.1
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS4.198Better1.862
Power consumption75 W75 W
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Power connector6 pinNone
Release date20222016
ArchitectureXe-HPGPascal
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 6.1
Launch price$139$119Better
Shader units / cores1024Better640
Clock speed300 - 2000 MHz1354 - 1455 MHzBetter
Base clock300 MHz1354 MHzBetter
Boost clock2000 MHzBetter1455 MHz
VRAM6 GB GDDR6Better2 GB GDDR5
Memory frequency15,5 GHzBetter7 GHz
Memory bus96 bit128 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth186 GB/sBetter112 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 4x8PCIe 3x16
Power consumption75 W75 W
Process node6 nmBetter14 nm
Recommended PSU250 W250 W
Length222 mm145 mmBetter
Die size157 mm²132 mm²Better
Memory cacheL2 4 MBBetterL1 48 KB, L2 1 MB
Transistor count7200 millionBetter3300 million
Max monitors43
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
USB Type-CNoNo
GAME TEST BENCH
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares Arc A380 and GTX 1050 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
Arc A380GTX 1050
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong
1080p High
22 FPSEstimated 66%
20 FPSEstimated 64%
1080p Ultra
19 FPSEstimated 66%
16 FPSEstimated 64%
1440p Ultra
10 FPSEstimated 59%
9 FPSEstimated 58%
4K Ultra
5 FPSEstimated 55%
5 FPSEstimated 55%
Black Myth: WukongArc A38022 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 105020 FPSEstimated 64%Arc A38019 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 105016 FPSEstimated 64%Arc A38010 FPSEstimated 59%GTX 10509 FPSEstimated 58%Arc A3805 FPSEstimated 55%GTX 10505 FPSEstimated 55%
Call of Duty: WarzoneArc A38022 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 105020 FPSEstimated 64%Arc A38019 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 105016 FPSEstimated 64%Arc A38010 FPSEstimated 59%GTX 10509 FPSEstimated 58%Arc A3805 FPSEstimated 55%GTX 10505 FPSEstimated 55%
Counter-Strike 2Arc A380188 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1050164 FPSEstimated 72%Arc A380129 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1050114 FPSEstimated 72%Arc A38069 FPSEstimated 67%GTX 105063 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A38023 FPSEstimated 62%GTX 105022 FPSEstimated 62%
Cyberpunk 2077Arc A380121 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1050106 FPSEstimated 72%Arc A380102 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 105090 FPSEstimated 72%Arc A38050 FPSEstimated 67%GTX 105045 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A38015 FPSEstimated 62%GTX 105015 FPSEstimated 62%
Forza Horizon 5Arc A380153 FPSEstimated 80%GTX 1050134 FPSEstimated 78%Arc A38097 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 105085 FPSEstimated 72%Arc A38062 FPSEstimated 67%GTX 105056 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A38034 FPSEstimated 62%GTX 105032 FPSEstimated 62%
God of War RagnarökArc A38022 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 105020 FPSEstimated 64%Arc A38019 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 105016 FPSEstimated 64%Arc A38010 FPSEstimated 59%GTX 10509 FPSEstimated 58%Arc A3805 FPSEstimated 55%GTX 10505 FPSEstimated 55%
Hogwarts LegacyArc A38099 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 105087 FPSEstimated 72%Arc A38081 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 105071 FPSEstimated 72%Arc A38045 FPSEstimated 67%GTX 105041 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A38016 FPSEstimated 62%GTX 105015 FPSEstimated 62%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024Arc A38022 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 105020 FPSEstimated 64%Arc A38019 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 105016 FPSEstimated 64%Arc A38010 FPSEstimated 59%GTX 10509 FPSEstimated 58%Arc A3805 FPSEstimated 55%GTX 10505 FPSEstimated 55%
Monster Hunter WildsArc A38022 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 105020 FPSEstimated 64%Arc A38019 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 105016 FPSEstimated 64%Arc A38010 FPSEstimated 59%GTX 10509 FPSEstimated 58%Arc A3805 FPSEstimated 55%GTX 10505 FPSEstimated 55%
StarfieldArc A38022 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 105020 FPSEstimated 64%Arc A38019 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 105016 FPSEstimated 64%Arc A38010 FPSEstimated 59%GTX 10509 FPSEstimated 58%Arc A3805 FPSEstimated 55%GTX 10505 FPSEstimated 55%
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares Arc A380 and GTX 1050 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100363212%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100443815%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100433910%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10060567%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares Arc A380 and GTX 1050 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10047439%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100464111%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100433910%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10049459%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100433910%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares Arc A380 and GTX 1050 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DirectX12.212.1
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingXeSS—
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 6.1
Architecture and release
The Architecture and release section compares Arc A380 and GTX 1050 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
ArchitectureXe-HPGPascal
Process node6 nmBetter14 nm
Release date20222016
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
The Core layout and clocks section compares Arc A380 and GTX 1050 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Transistor count7200 millionBetter3300 million
Die size157 mm²132 mm²Better
Shader units / cores1024Better640
Base clock300 MHz1354 MHzBetter
Boost clock2000 MHzBetter1455 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
The Form factor and compatibility section compares Arc A380 and GTX 1050 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
InterfacePCIe 4x8PCIe 3x16
Length222 mm145 mmBetter
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU250 W250 W
Power connector6 pinNone
Display outputs and limits
The Display outputs section compares Arc A380 and GTX 1050 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.0
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.0DisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors43
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares Arc A380 and GTX 1050 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
VRAM6 GB GDDR6Better2 GB GDDR5
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Memory bus96 bit128 bitBetter
TFLOPS4.198Better1.862
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxxAMDReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Arc A380 or GTX 1050?+
Arc A380 has the higher overall gaming score, while Arc A380 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GTX 1050 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GTX 1050 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Arc A380 offers more overall performance, while Arc A380 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GTX 1050 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Arc A380 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Arc A380 leads in combined 1440p performance. Arc A380 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Arc A380 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Arc A380 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Arc A380 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Arc A380 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.