Intel
Intel Arc A580 vs FirePro W2100
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
FirePro W2100
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Arc A580 and FirePro W2100 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Arc A580 outperforms FirePro W2100 by ~19% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+19%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Intel Arc A580 (~19%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider Arc A580
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 · XeSS
Reasons to consider FirePro W2100
- Lower stated power consumption
- Lower recorded market price
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.2 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
Intel
AMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
4831
91100
100100
6843
Graphics card ranking
Positions 50–55of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Intel Arc A580
111 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
FirePro W2100
Price $65.00Based on catalog performance per unit of current market price, not measured FPS.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
48Better
31
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
41Better
29
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
39Better
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
91
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
62Better
52
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Memory frequencyBetter
DisplayPort
HDMI
Device class
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Release date
Architecture
Upscaling
Thickness
Compute API
Launch priceBetter
Shader units / coresBetter
Memory type
Recommended PSUBetter
Die sizeBetter
Memory cacheBetter
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Transistor countBetter
Power connector
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Max monitors
Length
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares Arc A580 and FirePro W2100 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
Arc A580FirePro W2100
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
209 FPS
156 FPS
1080p Ultra
147 FPS
109 FPS
1440p Ultra
114 FPS
59 FPS
4K Ultra
44 FPS
21 FPS
Counter-Strike 2Arc A580209 FPSFirePro W2100156 FPSArc A580147 FPSFirePro W2100109 FPSArc A580114 FPSFirePro W210059 FPSArc A58044 FPSFirePro W210021 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077Arc A580135 FPSFirePro W2100100 FPSArc A580116 FPSFirePro W210086 FPSArc A58083 FPSFirePro W210043 FPSArc A58030 FPSFirePro W210014 FPS
Forza Horizon 5Arc A580170 FPSFirePro W2100127 FPSArc A580110 FPSFirePro W210082 FPSArc A580103 FPSFirePro W210053 FPSArc A58065 FPSFirePro W210031 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyArc A580110 FPSFirePro W210082 FPSArc A58092 FPSFirePro W210069 FPSArc A58074 FPSFirePro W210038 FPSArc A58030 FPSFirePro W210014 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100483143%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100543251%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100543445%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100684345%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100911009%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100573645%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100563643%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100543445%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100593843%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100543543%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.211.1
Vulkan1.41.2
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingXeSSNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 1.2
Architecture and release
ArchitectureXe-HPGGCN 1.0
Process node6 nmBetter28 nm
Release date20232014
Device classDesktopProf
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count21700 millionBetter950 million
Die size406 mm²77 mm²Better
Shader units / cores3072Better320
Base clock1700 MHzBetter630 MHz
Boost clock2000 MHzBetter680 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 3x8
LengthVaries by board168 mm
ThicknessDual-slotSingle-slot
Recommended PSU450 W200 WBetter
Power connector8+8 pinNone
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.1Board dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.0DisplayPort 1.2
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors42
Max resolution7680 × 43204096 × 2160
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM8 GB GDDR6Better2 GB DDR3
Memory typeGDDR6DDR3
Memory bus256 bitBetter128 bit
TFLOPS12.29Better0.435
Other comparisons
RTX 3050 8 GBNVIDIAReviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 70
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (6)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (2)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Arc A580 or FirePro W2100?+
Arc A580 has the higher overall gaming score, while Arc A580 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Arc A580 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Arc A580 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Arc A580 offers more overall performance, while Arc A580 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Arc A580 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Arc A580 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Arc A580 leads in combined 1440p performance. Arc A580 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Arc A580 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
FirePro W2100 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
FirePro W2100 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Arc A580 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.