Intel
Intel Arc A770 vs GeForce RTX 3070
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
RTX 3070
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Arc A770 and RTX 3070 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Arc A770 outperforms RTX 3070 by 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+1%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.Intel Arc A770 vs GeForce RTX 3070: key takeaway
The comparison of Arc A770 and RTX 3070 shows a 0% advantage for Arc A770 in gaming performance, while RTX 3070 may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
Intel
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
5555
8183
100100
8868
COMPARISON RESULT
The devices received the same overall score
Arc A770 leads in combined game performance. Arc A770 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Performance is nearly identical
Arc A770 costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 33–38of 317
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce RTX 3070
127 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Intel Arc A770
100/100 · Price $329The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares Arc A770 and RTX 3070 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
55
55
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
46
46
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
44
44
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
81
83Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
69
69
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares Arc A770 and RTX 3070 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.0DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.1
Device classDesktopDesktop
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS19.6620.31Better
Power consumption225 W220 WBetter
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Power connector8+8 pin8 pin
Memory cacheL2 16 MBBetterL1 128 KB, L2 4 MB
UpscalingXeSSDLSS 2
Clock speed2100 - 2400 MHzBetter1500 - 1730 MHz
Base clock2100 MHzBetter1500 MHz
Boost clock2400 MHzBetter1730 MHz
VRAM16 GB GDDR6Better8 GB GDDR6
Memory frequency16 GHzBetter14 GHz
Memory bus256 bit256 bit
Memory bandwidth512 GB/sBetter448 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 4x16
Release date20222020
ArchitectureXe-HPGAmpere
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.6
Launch price$329Better$499
Shader units / cores40965888Better
Power consumption225 W220 WBetter
Process node6 nmBetter8 nm
Recommended PSU550 W550 W
Die size406 mm²392 mm²Better
Transistor count21700 millionBetter17400 million
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
LengthVaries by board242 mm
USB Type-CNoNo
GAME TEST BENCH
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares Arc A770 and RTX 3070 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
Arc A770RTX 3070
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong
1080p High
27 FPSEstimated 66%
29 FPSEstimated 66%
1080p Ultra
23 FPSEstimated 66%
24 FPSEstimated 66%
1440p Ultra
17 FPSEstimated 66%
18 FPSEstimated 66%
4K Ultra
10 FPSEstimated 66%
8 FPSEstimated 60%
Black Myth: WukongArc A77027 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 307029 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A77023 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 307024 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A77017 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 307018 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A77010 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 30708 FPSEstimated 60%
Call of Duty: WarzoneArc A77027 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 307029 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A77023 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 307024 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A77017 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 307018 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A77010 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 30708 FPSEstimated 60%
Counter-Strike 2Arc A770228 FPSEstimated 74%RTX 3070242 FPSEstimated 74%Arc A770160 FPSEstimated 74%RTX 3070170 FPSEstimated 74%Arc A770125 FPSEstimated 74%RTX 3070132 FPSEstimated 74%Arc A77062 FPSEstimated 74%RTX 307049 FPSEstimated 68%
Cyberpunk 2077Arc A770147 FPSEstimated 74%RTX 3070156 FPSEstimated 74%Arc A770127 FPSEstimated 74%RTX 3070135 FPSEstimated 74%Arc A77090 FPSEstimated 74%RTX 307096 FPSEstimated 74%Arc A77042 FPSEstimated 74%RTX 307033 FPSEstimated 68%
Forza Horizon 5Arc A770186 FPSEstimated 80%RTX 3070197 FPSEstimated 80%Arc A770120 FPSEstimated 74%RTX 3070128 FPSEstimated 74%Arc A770112 FPSEstimated 74%RTX 3070119 FPSEstimated 74%Arc A77091 FPSEstimated 74%RTX 307072 FPSEstimated 68%
God of War RagnarökArc A77027 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 307029 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A77023 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 307024 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A77017 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 307018 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A77010 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 30708 FPSEstimated 60%
Hogwarts LegacyArc A770120 FPSEstimated 74%RTX 3070128 FPSEstimated 74%Arc A770101 FPSEstimated 74%RTX 3070107 FPSEstimated 74%Arc A77081 FPSEstimated 74%RTX 307086 FPSEstimated 74%Arc A77042 FPSEstimated 74%RTX 307033 FPSEstimated 68%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024Arc A77027 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 307029 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A77023 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 307024 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A77017 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 307018 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A77010 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 30708 FPSEstimated 60%
Monster Hunter WildsArc A77027 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 307029 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A77023 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 307024 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A77017 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 307018 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A77010 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 30708 FPSEstimated 60%
StarfieldArc A77027 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 307029 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A77023 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 307024 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A77017 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 307018 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A77010 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 30708 FPSEstimated 60%
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares Arc A770 and RTX 3070 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10055550%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100645712%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10064598%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100886826%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 10081832%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares Arc A770 and RTX 3070 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100706114%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100686013%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10064598%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100736216%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100655910%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares Arc A770 and RTX 3070 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingXeSSDLSS 2
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.6
Architecture and release
The Architecture and release section compares Arc A770 and RTX 3070 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
ArchitectureXe-HPGAmpere
Process node6 nmBetter8 nm
Release date20222020
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
The Core layout and clocks section compares Arc A770 and RTX 3070 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Transistor count21700 millionBetter17400 million
Die size406 mm²392 mm²Better
Shader units / cores40965888Better
Base clock2100 MHzBetter1500 MHz
Boost clock2400 MHzBetter1730 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
The Form factor and compatibility section compares Arc A770 and RTX 3070 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 4x16
LengthVaries by board242 mm
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU550 W550 W
Power connector8+8 pin8 pin
Display outputs and limits
The Display outputs section compares Arc A770 and RTX 3070 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.1
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.0DisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares Arc A770 and RTX 3070 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
VRAM16 GB GDDR6Better8 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus256 bit256 bit
TFLOPS19.6620.31Better
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxxAMDReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Arc A770 or RTX 3070?+
Arc A770 has the higher overall gaming score, while Arc A770 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 3070 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 3070 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Arc A770 offers more overall performance, while Arc A770 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 3070 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Arc A770 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Arc A770 leads in combined 1440p performance. Arc A770 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Arc A770 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RTX 3070 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RTX 3070 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Arc A770 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.