Intel
Intel Arc B570 vs Radeon Pro W6800
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
Pro W6800
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Arc B570 and Pro W6800 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Arc B570 outperforms Pro W6800 by ~21% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+21%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Intel Arc B570 (~21%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider Arc B570
- Lower stated power consumption
- Lower recorded market price
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 · XeSS
Reasons to consider Pro W6800
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.1 · FSR
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
Intel
AMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
4754
10072
9951
74100
Graphics card ranking
Positions 44–49of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Intel Arc B570
87 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Intel Arc B570
Price $302.00Based on catalog performance per unit of current market price, not measured FPS.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
47
54Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
40
45Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
38
43Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
72
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
63Better
52
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DisplayPort
HDMI
Device class
Upscaling
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
Launch priceBetter
Shader units / coresBetter
Interface
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSUBetter
LengthBetter
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Transistor countBetter
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares Arc B570 and Pro W6800 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
Arc B570Pro W6800
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
208 FPS
221 FPS
1080p Ultra
146 FPS
155 FPS
1440p Ultra
114 FPS
121 FPS
4K Ultra
41 FPS
60 FPS
Counter-Strike 2Arc B570208 FPSPro W6800221 FPSArc B570146 FPSPro W6800155 FPSArc B570114 FPSPro W6800121 FPSArc B57041 FPSPro W680060 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077Arc B570134 FPSPro W6800143 FPSArc B570116 FPSPro W6800123 FPSArc B57082 FPSPro W680088 FPSArc B57028 FPSPro W680040 FPS
Forza Horizon 5Arc B570169 FPSPro W6800180 FPSArc B570110 FPSPro W6800117 FPSArc B570102 FPSPro W6800109 FPSArc B57061 FPSPro W680088 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyArc B570110 FPSPro W6800117 FPSArc B57092 FPSPro W680097 FPSArc B57074 FPSPro W680078 FPSArc B57028 FPSPro W680041 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100475414%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100576412%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100556720%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1007410030%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001007233%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100597524%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100587222%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100556720%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100627924%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100556821%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingXeSSFSR
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 2.1
Architecture and release
ArchitectureXe2-HPGRDNA 2.0
Process node5 nmBetter7 nm
Release date20252021
Device classDesktopProf
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count19600 million26800 millionBetter
Die size272 mm²Better520 mm²
Shader units / cores23043840Better
Base clock2500 MHzBetter2075 MHz
Boost clock2500 MHzBetter2320 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4x8PCIe 4x16
Length272 mm267 mmBetter
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU450 WBetter600 W
Power connector8 pin6+8 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.1aHDMI 2.1
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.1DisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors46
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM10 GB GDDR632 GB GDDR6Better
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus160 bit256 bitBetter
TFLOPS11.5217.83Better
Other comparisons
RTX 4070NVIDIAReviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 70
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (6)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (2)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Arc B570 or Pro W6800?+
Arc B570 has the higher overall gaming score, while Arc B570 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Arc B570 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Arc B570 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Arc B570 offers more overall performance, while Arc B570 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Arc B570 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Arc B570 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Arc B570 leads in combined 1440p performance. Arc B570 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Arc B570 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Arc B570 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Arc B570 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Arc B570 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.