Intel Arc B580 vs GeForce 9800 GT

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc B580 and 9800 GT across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Arc B580 outperforms 9800 GT by ~54% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+54%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?

H2HBench Data Quality

Low confidence
Specifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 16Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026

Limited verified data

H2HBench Verdict

Higher catalog score: Intel Arc B580 (~26%)

The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.

Reasons to consider Arc B580

  • Higher catalog performance index
  • More graphics memory
  • Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 · XeSS 2

Reasons to consider 9800 GT

  • Lower stated power consumption
  • Lower recorded market price
  • Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1 · Not supported
Low confidence

Catalog metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
Performance
6039
Efficiency
100100
Price / performance
100100
Memory capacity
8013
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.

Graphics card ranking

Full ranking →

The ranking is recalculated automatically from catalog data.

Positions 7–12of 321
Arc B580#9position in the GPU ranking
9800 GT#83position in the GPU ranking

Which should you choose?

Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.

COMMUNITY CHOICE

GeForce 9800 GT

48 likes

Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.

BEST PRICE / PERFORMANCE

GeForce 9800 GT

Price $35.00

Based on catalog performance per unit of current market price, not measured FPS.

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

CategoryArc B5809800 GT
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
60Better
39
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
50Better
34
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
47Better
32
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
72Better
57

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

SpecificationArc B5809800 GT
Device class
Architecture
Process nodeBetter
Upscaling
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
Compute API
Shader units / coresBetter
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
TFLOPSBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory type
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Power connector
Recommended PSUBetter
Interface
DisplayPort
HDMI
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Release date
Launch priceBetter
Thickness
LengthBetter
Die size
Memory cache
Transistor count

Gaming FPS

Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.

The Gaming FPS section compares Arc B580 and 9800 GT across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.

Arc B5809800 GT
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080p High
195 FPS
1080p Ultra
137 FPS
1440p Ultra
77 FPS
4K Ultra
29 FPS
Game1080p High1080p Ultra1440p Ultra4K Ultra
Counter-Strike 2Arc B5809800 GT195 FPSArc B5809800 GT137 FPSArc B5809800 GT77 FPSArc B5809800 GT29 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077Arc B5809800 GT126 FPSArc B5809800 GT108 FPSArc B5809800 GT56 FPSArc B5809800 GT19 FPS
Forza Horizon 5Arc B5809800 GT159 FPSArc B5809800 GT103 FPSArc B5809800 GT69 FPSArc B5809800 GT43 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyArc B5809800 GT103 FPSArc B5809800 GT86 FPSArc B5809800 GT50 FPSArc B5809800 GT20 FPS
Average FPSArc B5809800 GT146 FPSArc B5809800 GT109 FPSArc B5809800 GT63 FPSArc B5809800 GT28 FPS

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

IndexArc B5809800 GTDifference
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100603942%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100673271%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100663269%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1008013144%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

IndexArc B5809800 GTDifference
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100692788%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100682883%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100663269%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100712499%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100663172%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling

SpecificationsArc B5809800 GT
DirectXDirectX 12 Ultimate10.0
Vulkan1.3Not supported
OpenGL4.63.3
UpscalingXeSS 2Not supported
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1

Architecture and release

SpecificationsArc B5809800 GT
ArchitectureXe2Tesla
Process nodeTSMC N5Better65 nm
Release date2024-12-132008
Device classDesktopDesktop

GPU cores, die and clocks

SpecificationsArc B5809800 GT
Transistor count754 million
Die size324 mm²
Shader units / cores2560Better112
Base clock2670 MHzBetter600 MHz
Boost clock2670 MHzBetter600 MHz

Board size, power and compatibility

SpecificationsArc B5809800 GT
InterfacePCIe 4x8PCIe 2x16
Length272 mm229 mmBetter
ThicknessDual-slotSingle-slot
Recommended PSU600 W300 WBetter
Power connector8 pin6 pin

Display outputs and limits

SpecificationsArc B5809800 GT
HDMIHDMI 2.1Board dependent
DisplayPort3 × DisplayPort 2.1Board dependent
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors43
Max resolution7680 × 43202560 × 1600

Memory and compute throughput

SpecificationsArc B5809800 GT
VRAM12 GB GDDR6512 MB GDDR3Better
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Memory bus192 bit256 bitBetter
TFLOPS13.67Better0.336

Other comparisons

6

Reviews and questions

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device AArc B58072
Device B9800 GT57
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

Evidence details

Data coverage

Verified gaming results
0
Verified synthetic results
0
Games with verified results
0
Verified community results
0
Estimated / unverified results
16
Specifications
0 / 67

Specification record updated:

Benchmarks updated:

Price record updated:

Comparison reviewed:

Calculated scores · How is this calculated?

Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.

clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)
Price evidence · View sources (5)

Verified community results

No verified community benchmarks yet.

Reviewed by

No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.

Comparison history

Show recorded changes (2)
  1. · Record updated: products
  2. · Record updated: products

Why you can trust this comparison

Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.

Report incorrect data

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: Arc B580 or 9800 GT?

Arc B580 has the higher overall gaming score, while Arc B580 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

9800 GT is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

9800 GT is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

Arc B580 offers more overall performance, while Arc B580 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

9800 GT is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

Arc B580 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

Arc B580 leads in combined 1440p performance. Arc B580 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

Arc B580 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

9800 GT is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

9800 GT is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to Arc B580 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.