Intel
Intel Arc B580 vs Intel Arc B370
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
Intel
Arc B370
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Arc B580 and Arc B370 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Arc B370 outperforms Arc B580 by ~15% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+15%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Partially verifiedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 0Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Intel Arc B580 (~24%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider Arc B580
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 · XeSS 2
Reasons to consider Arc B370
- Higher catalog performance index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 · Intel XeSS
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
IntelPerformance
6069
Graphics card ranking
Positions 7–12of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
60
69Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
50
56Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
47
54Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
51
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
72Better
58
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Device class
ArchitectureBetter
Process nodeBetter
Upscaling
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
Compute API
Shader units / coresBetter
Clock speed
Base clock
Boost clockBetter
TFLOPS
VRAM
Memory type
Memory frequency
Memory bus
Memory bandwidth
Power consumption—
Power consumption
Power connector
Recommended PSU
Interface
DisplayPort
HDMI
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Release date
Launch price—
Thickness
Length
Transistor count—
Die size—
Memory cache—
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100606914%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10067716%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10066694%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100800200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001000200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10069690%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10068691%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10066694%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10071693%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10066694%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectXDirectX 12 UltimateDirectX 12 Ultimate
Vulkan1.3Not publicly specified
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingXeSS 2Intel XeSS
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 3.0
Architecture and release
ArchitectureXe2Xe3Better
Process nodeTSMC N5TSMC N3EBetter
Release date2024-12-13Q1'26
Device classDesktopMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count—Not publicly specified
Die size—Not publicly specified
Shader units / cores2560Better10 Xe cores
Base clock2670 MHzNot publicly specified
Boost clock2670 MHzBetterUp to 2.4 GHz (depends on host processor)
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4x8Integrated into processor package
Length272 mmNot applicable (integrated GPU)
ThicknessDual-slotNot applicable (integrated GPU)
Recommended PSU600 WSystem dependent
Power connector8 pinNot applicable (integrated GPU)
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.1 FRL (OEM dependent)
DisplayPort3 × DisplayPort 2.1DisplayPort 2.1 UHBR20 (OEM dependent)
USB Type-CNoOEM dependent
Max monitors44 (platform capability)
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (DisplayPort)
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM12 GB GDDR6Shared system memory; OEM configurable
Memory typeGDDR6Shared LPDDR5X
Memory bus192 bitDepends on system memory configuration
TFLOPS13.67Not publicly specified
Other comparisons
RTX 4090NVIDIA
RX 9070 XT 16 GBAMDReviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 0
- Specifications
- 22 / 65
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (2)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
No recorded changes yet. Change tracking starts with the evidence system; earlier history has not been reconstructed.
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Arc B580 or Arc B370?+
Arc B580 has the higher overall gaming score, while Arc B580 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Arc B580 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Arc B580 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Arc B580 offers more overall performance, while Arc B580 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Arc B580 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Arc B580 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Arc B580 leads in combined 1440p performance. Arc B580 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Arc B580 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Arc B580 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Arc B580 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Arc B580 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.