Intel
Intel Arc B770 vs Quadro NVS 310
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
Quadro NVS 310
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Arc B770 and Quadro NVS 310 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Arc B770 outperforms Quadro NVS 310 by ~23% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+23%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Intel Arc B770 (~23%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider Arc B770
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 · XeSS
Reasons to consider Quadro NVS 310
- Lower stated power consumption
- Lower recorded market price
- Recorded feature support: Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
Intel
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
6039
89100
100100
8813
Graphics card ranking
Positions 12–17of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Quadro NVS 310
178 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Quadro NVS 310
Price $65.00Based on catalog performance per unit of current market price, not measured FPS.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
60Better
39
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
50Better
34
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
47Better
32
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
89
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
70Better
57
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Device class
DirectX
Vulkan
HDMI
DisplayPort
TFLOPSBetter
USB Type-C
OpenGL
Upscaling
Compute API—
Power consumptionBetter
Max monitors
Max resolution
Recommended PSU
Length
Thickness
Architecture
Transistor count
Die size
Shader units / cores
Memory cache
Launch price——
Memory type
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Power connector—
Release date
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares Arc B770 and Quadro NVS 310 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
Arc B770Quadro NVS 310
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
248 FPS
197 FPS
1080p Ultra
174 FPS
138 FPS
1440p Ultra
135 FPS
74 FPS
4K Ultra
67 FPS
27 FPS
Counter-Strike 2Arc B770248 FPSQuadro NVS 310197 FPSArc B770174 FPSQuadro NVS 310138 FPSArc B770135 FPSQuadro NVS 31074 FPSArc B77067 FPSQuadro NVS 31027 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077Arc B770160 FPSQuadro NVS 310127 FPSArc B770138 FPSQuadro NVS 310109 FPSArc B77098 FPSQuadro NVS 31054 FPSArc B77045 FPSQuadro NVS 31018 FPS
Forza Horizon 5Arc B770202 FPSQuadro NVS 310160 FPSArc B770131 FPSQuadro NVS 310104 FPSArc B770122 FPSQuadro NVS 31067 FPSArc B77099 FPSQuadro NVS 31039 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyArc B770131 FPSQuadro NVS 310104 FPSArc B770109 FPSQuadro NVS 31087 FPSArc B77088 FPSQuadro NVS 31048 FPSArc B77046 FPSQuadro NVS 31018 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100603942%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100673271%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100683272%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1008813149%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1008910012%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100732792%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100712887%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100683272%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 1007524103%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100683175%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.212.0
Vulkan1.41.2
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingXeSSNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0—
Architecture and release
ArchitectureNot publicly specifiedNot publicly specified
Process node5 nmBetter40 nm
Release date20262012
Device classDesktopProf
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor countNot publicly specifiedNot publicly specified
Die sizeNot publicly specifiedNot publicly specified
Shader units / coresNot publicly specifiedNot publicly specified
Base clock2100 MHzBetter523 MHz
Boost clock2400 MHzBetter523 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 2x16
LengthVaries by boardVaries by board
ThicknessVaries by boardVaries by board
Recommended PSUVaries by boardVaries by board
Power connector6+8 pin—
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.1Board dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.1Board dependent
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitorsVaries by boardVaries by board
Max resolution7680 × 4320Varies by board
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM16 GB GDDR6512 MB DDR3Better
Memory typeGDDR6DDR3
Memory bus256 bitBetter64 bit
TFLOPS28Better0.05
Other comparisons
Radeon RX 9070AMDReviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 66
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (4)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (2)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Arc B770 or Quadro NVS 310?+
Arc B770 has the higher overall gaming score, while Arc B770 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Quadro NVS 310 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Quadro NVS 310 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Arc B770 offers more overall performance, while Arc B770 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Quadro NVS 310 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Arc B770 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Arc B770 leads in combined 1440p performance. Arc B770 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Arc B770 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Quadro NVS 310 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Quadro NVS 310 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Arc B770 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.