AMD
ATI Radeon HD 3750 vs GeForce GTX 1650
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GTX 1650
Aggregate performance score
We've compared ATI Radeon HD 3750 and GTX 1650 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗ATI Radeon HD 3750 outperforms GTX 1650 by 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+18%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.ATI Radeon HD 3750 vs GeForce GTX 1650: key takeaway
The comparison of ATI Radeon HD 3750 and GTX 1650 shows a 18% advantage for ATI Radeon HD 3750 in gaming performance, while GTX 1650 may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMD
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3933
100100
100100
1356
COMPARISON RESULT
ATI Radeon HD 3750 is the best overall choice
ATI Radeon HD 3750 leads in combined game performance. ATI Radeon HD 3750 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
ATI Radeon HD 3750 leads in the combined performance index
ATI Radeon HD 3750 costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 91–96of 317
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce GTX 1650
146 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
ATI Radeon HD 3750
100/100 · Price $79The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares ATI Radeon HD 3750 and GTX 1650 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
39Better
33
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
34Better
30
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
32Better
28
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
62Better
58
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares ATI Radeon HD 3750 and GTX 1650 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
InterfacePCIe 2x16PCIe 3x16
Device classDesktopDesktop
Max monitors33
Max resolution2560 × 16007680 × 4320
USB Type-CNoNo
LengthVaries by board229 mm
HDMI—HDMI 2.0
DisplayPort—DisplayPort 1.4a
DirectX10.112.1
Vulkan—1.4
OpenGL3.34.6
TFLOPS0.1912.984Better
Power consumption65 WBetter75 W
Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Power connectorNoneNone
Release date20082019
ArchitectureTeraScaleTuring
ThicknessSingle-slotDual-slot
Upscaling——
Compute API—OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5
Launch price$79Better$169
Shader units / cores120896Better
Clock speed796 MHz1485 - 1665 MHzBetter
Base clock796 MHz1485 MHzBetter
Boost clock796 MHz1665 MHzBetter
VRAM512 MB GDDR3Better4 GB GDDR5
Memory frequency1,4 GHz8 GHzBetter
Memory bus128 bit128 bit
Memory bandwidth22 GB/s128 GB/sBetter
Power consumption65 WBetter75 W
Process node55 nm12 nmBetter
Recommended PSU250 W250 W
Die size135 mm²Better200 mm²
Memory cacheL2 0.13 MBBetterL1 64 KB, L2 1 MB
Transistor count378 million4700 millionBetter
GAME TEST BENCH
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares ATI Radeon HD 3750 and GTX 1650 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
ATI Radeon HD 3750GTX 1650
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong
1080p High
23 FPSEstimated 64%
20 FPSEstimated 64%
1080p Ultra
20 FPSEstimated 64%
17 FPSEstimated 64%
1440p Ultra
10 FPSEstimated 58%
9 FPSEstimated 58%
4K Ultra
5 FPSEstimated 55%
5 FPSEstimated 55%
Black Myth: WukongATI Radeon HD 375023 FPSEstimated 64%GTX 165020 FPSEstimated 64%ATI Radeon HD 375020 FPSEstimated 64%GTX 165017 FPSEstimated 64%ATI Radeon HD 375010 FPSEstimated 58%GTX 16509 FPSEstimated 58%ATI Radeon HD 37505 FPSEstimated 55%GTX 16505 FPSEstimated 55%
Call of Duty: WarzoneATI Radeon HD 375023 FPSEstimated 64%GTX 165020 FPSEstimated 64%ATI Radeon HD 375020 FPSEstimated 64%GTX 165017 FPSEstimated 64%ATI Radeon HD 375010 FPSEstimated 58%GTX 16509 FPSEstimated 58%ATI Radeon HD 37505 FPSEstimated 55%GTX 16505 FPSEstimated 55%
Counter-Strike 2ATI Radeon HD 3750197 FPSEstimated 72%GTX 1650169 FPSEstimated 72%ATI Radeon HD 3750139 FPSEstimated 72%GTX 1650116 FPSEstimated 72%ATI Radeon HD 375075 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 165064 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 375027 FPSEstimated 62%GTX 165022 FPSEstimated 62%
Cyberpunk 2077ATI Radeon HD 3750127 FPSEstimated 72%GTX 1650109 FPSEstimated 72%ATI Radeon HD 3750110 FPSEstimated 72%GTX 165092 FPSEstimated 72%ATI Radeon HD 375054 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 165046 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 375018 FPSEstimated 62%GTX 165015 FPSEstimated 62%
Forza Horizon 5ATI Radeon HD 3750161 FPSEstimated 78%GTX 1650138 FPSEstimated 78%ATI Radeon HD 3750104 FPSEstimated 72%GTX 165087 FPSEstimated 72%ATI Radeon HD 375067 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 165057 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 375039 FPSEstimated 62%GTX 165033 FPSEstimated 62%
God of War RagnarökATI Radeon HD 375023 FPSEstimated 64%GTX 165020 FPSEstimated 64%ATI Radeon HD 375020 FPSEstimated 64%GTX 165017 FPSEstimated 64%ATI Radeon HD 375010 FPSEstimated 58%GTX 16509 FPSEstimated 58%ATI Radeon HD 37505 FPSEstimated 55%GTX 16505 FPSEstimated 55%
Hogwarts LegacyATI Radeon HD 3750104 FPSEstimated 72%GTX 165089 FPSEstimated 72%ATI Radeon HD 375087 FPSEstimated 72%GTX 165073 FPSEstimated 72%ATI Radeon HD 375048 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 165041 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 375018 FPSEstimated 62%GTX 165015 FPSEstimated 62%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024ATI Radeon HD 375023 FPSEstimated 64%GTX 165020 FPSEstimated 64%ATI Radeon HD 375020 FPSEstimated 64%GTX 165017 FPSEstimated 64%ATI Radeon HD 375010 FPSEstimated 58%GTX 16509 FPSEstimated 58%ATI Radeon HD 37505 FPSEstimated 55%GTX 16505 FPSEstimated 55%
Monster Hunter WildsATI Radeon HD 375023 FPSEstimated 64%GTX 165020 FPSEstimated 64%ATI Radeon HD 375020 FPSEstimated 64%GTX 165017 FPSEstimated 64%ATI Radeon HD 375010 FPSEstimated 58%GTX 16509 FPSEstimated 58%ATI Radeon HD 37505 FPSEstimated 55%GTX 16505 FPSEstimated 55%
StarfieldATI Radeon HD 375023 FPSEstimated 64%GTX 165020 FPSEstimated 64%ATI Radeon HD 375020 FPSEstimated 64%GTX 165017 FPSEstimated 64%ATI Radeon HD 375010 FPSEstimated 58%GTX 16509 FPSEstimated 58%ATI Radeon HD 37505 FPSEstimated 55%GTX 16505 FPSEstimated 55%
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares ATI Radeon HD 3750 and GTX 1650 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100393317%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100334019%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100323920%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1001356125%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares ATI Radeon HD 3750 and GTX 1650 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100274346%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100284240%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100323920%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100244561%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100314025%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares ATI Radeon HD 3750 and GTX 1650 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DirectX10.112.1
Vulkan—1.4
OpenGL3.34.6
Upscaling——
Compute API—OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5
Architecture and release
The Architecture and release section compares ATI Radeon HD 3750 and GTX 1650 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
ArchitectureTeraScaleTuring
Process node55 nm12 nmBetter
Release date20082019
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
The Core layout and clocks section compares ATI Radeon HD 3750 and GTX 1650 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Transistor count378 million4700 millionBetter
Die size135 mm²Better200 mm²
Shader units / cores120896Better
Base clock796 MHz1485 MHzBetter
Boost clock796 MHz1665 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
The Form factor and compatibility section compares ATI Radeon HD 3750 and GTX 1650 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
InterfacePCIe 2x16PCIe 3x16
LengthVaries by board229 mm
ThicknessSingle-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU250 W250 W
Power connectorNoneNone
Display outputs and limits
The Display outputs section compares ATI Radeon HD 3750 and GTX 1650 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
HDMI—HDMI 2.0
DisplayPort—DisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors33
Max resolution2560 × 16007680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares ATI Radeon HD 3750 and GTX 1650 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
VRAM512 MB GDDR3Better4 GB GDDR5
Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Memory bus128 bit128 bit
TFLOPS0.1912.984Better
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
Arc A310IntelReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: ATI Radeon HD 3750 or GTX 1650?+
ATI Radeon HD 3750 has the higher overall gaming score, while ATI Radeon HD 3750 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GTX 1650 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GTX 1650 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
ATI Radeon HD 3750 offers more overall performance, while ATI Radeon HD 3750 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GTX 1650 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
ATI Radeon HD 3750 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
ATI Radeon HD 3750 leads in combined 1440p performance. ATI Radeon HD 3750 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
ATI Radeon HD 3750 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
ATI Radeon HD 3750 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
ATI Radeon HD 3750 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to ATI Radeon HD 3750 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.