H2H

ATI Radeon HD 3750 vs Radeon RX 6950 XT

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared ATI Radeon HD 3750 and RX 6950 XT across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 6950 XT outperforms ATI Radeon HD 3750 by 46% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+46%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.
QUICK COMPARISON ANALYSIS

ATI Radeon HD 3750 vs Radeon RX 6950 XT: key takeaway

The comparison of ATI Radeon HD 3750 and RX 6950 XT shows a 46% advantage for RX 6950 XT in gaming performance, while ATI Radeon HD 3750 may still be stronger in value for money. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
Performance
3957
Efficiency
10057
Price / performance
10069
Memory capacity
1388
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMPARISON RESULT

ATI Radeon HD 3750 is the best overall choice

ATI Radeon HD 3750 leads in combined game performance. ATI Radeon HD 3750 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE5%

ATI Radeon HD 3750 leads in the combined performance index

PRICE DIFFERENCE$725

ATI Radeon HD 3750 costs less

CATALOG POSITION

Graphics card ranking

Full ranking →

The ranking is recalculated automatically from catalog data.

Positions 91–96of 317
ATI Radeon HD 3750#93position in the GPU ranking
RX 6950 XTnot in TOP100position in the GPU ranking
COMPARISON VERDICT

Which should you choose?

Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.

COMMUNITY CHOICE

Radeon RX 6950 XT

111 likes

Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.

$/FPSBEST PRICE / FPS

ATI Radeon HD 3750

100/100 · Price $79

The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.

OVERALL SCORE

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

The Summary score section compares ATI Radeon HD 3750 and RX 6950 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

CategoryATI Radeon HD 3750RX 6950 XT
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
39
57Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
34
47Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
32
45Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
57
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
62Better
59
FULL COMPARISON

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

The Specifications section compares ATI Radeon HD 3750 and RX 6950 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationATI Radeon HD 3750RX 6950 XT
InterfacePCIe 2x16PCIe 4x16
Device classDesktopDesktop
Max monitors33
Max resolution2560 × 16007680 × 4320
USB Type-CNoNo
LengthVaries by board267 mm
HDMIHDMI 2.1
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4a
DirectX10.112.2
Vulkan1.4
OpenGL3.34.6
TFLOPS0.19123.65Better
Power consumption65 WBetter335 W
Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Power connectorNone8+8 pin
Release date20082022
ArchitectureTeraScaleRDNA 2.0
ThicknessSingle-slotTriple-slot
UpscalingFSR
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1
Launch price$79Better$1099
Shader units / cores1205120Better
Clock speed796 MHz1925 - 2324 MHzBetter
Base clock796 MHz1925 MHzBetter
Boost clock796 MHz2324 MHzBetter
VRAM512 MB GDDR3Better16 GB GDDR6
Memory frequency1,4 GHz18 GHzBetter
Memory bus128 bit256 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth22 GB/s576 GB/sBetter
Power consumption65 WBetter335 W
Process node55 nm7 nmBetter
Recommended PSU250 WBetter700 W
Die size135 mm²Better520 mm²
Memory cacheL2 0.13 MBBetterL1 128 KB, L2 4 MB
Transistor count378 million26800 millionBetter
GAME TEST BENCH

Gaming FPS

Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.

The Gaming FPS section compares ATI Radeon HD 3750 and RX 6950 XT across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.

ATI Radeon HD 3750RX 6950 XT
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong

Black Myth: Wukong

1080p High
23 FPSEstimated 64%
28 FPSEstimated 66%
1080p Ultra
20 FPSEstimated 64%
24 FPSEstimated 66%
1440p Ultra
10 FPSEstimated 58%
18 FPSEstimated 66%
4K Ultra
5 FPSEstimated 55%
10 FPSEstimated 66%
Game1080p High1080p Ultra1440p Ultra4K Ultra
Black Myth: WukongATI Radeon HD 375023 FPSEstimated 64%RX 6950 XT28 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 375020 FPSEstimated 64%RX 6950 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 375010 FPSEstimated 58%RX 6950 XT18 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 37505 FPSEstimated 55%RX 6950 XT10 FPSEstimated 66%
Call of Duty: WarzoneATI Radeon HD 375023 FPSEstimated 64%RX 6950 XT28 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 375020 FPSEstimated 64%RX 6950 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 375010 FPSEstimated 58%RX 6950 XT18 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 37505 FPSEstimated 55%RX 6950 XT10 FPSEstimated 66%
Counter-Strike 2ATI Radeon HD 3750197 FPSEstimated 72%RX 6950 XT234 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 3750139 FPSEstimated 72%RX 6950 XT165 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 375075 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6950 XT128 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 375027 FPSEstimated 62%RX 6950 XT64 FPSEstimated 74%
Cyberpunk 2077ATI Radeon HD 3750127 FPSEstimated 72%RX 6950 XT151 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 3750110 FPSEstimated 72%RX 6950 XT130 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 375054 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6950 XT93 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 375018 FPSEstimated 62%RX 6950 XT43 FPSEstimated 74%
Forza Horizon 5ATI Radeon HD 3750161 FPSEstimated 78%RX 6950 XT191 FPSEstimated 80%ATI Radeon HD 3750104 FPSEstimated 72%RX 6950 XT124 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 375067 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6950 XT115 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 375039 FPSEstimated 62%RX 6950 XT94 FPSEstimated 74%
God of War RagnarökATI Radeon HD 375023 FPSEstimated 64%RX 6950 XT28 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 375020 FPSEstimated 64%RX 6950 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 375010 FPSEstimated 58%RX 6950 XT18 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 37505 FPSEstimated 55%RX 6950 XT10 FPSEstimated 66%
Hogwarts LegacyATI Radeon HD 3750104 FPSEstimated 72%RX 6950 XT124 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 375087 FPSEstimated 72%RX 6950 XT103 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 375048 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6950 XT83 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 375018 FPSEstimated 62%RX 6950 XT43 FPSEstimated 74%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024ATI Radeon HD 375023 FPSEstimated 64%RX 6950 XT28 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 375020 FPSEstimated 64%RX 6950 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 375010 FPSEstimated 58%RX 6950 XT18 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 37505 FPSEstimated 55%RX 6950 XT10 FPSEstimated 66%
Monster Hunter WildsATI Radeon HD 375023 FPSEstimated 64%RX 6950 XT28 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 375020 FPSEstimated 64%RX 6950 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 375010 FPSEstimated 58%RX 6950 XT18 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 37505 FPSEstimated 55%RX 6950 XT10 FPSEstimated 66%
StarfieldATI Radeon HD 375023 FPSEstimated 64%RX 6950 XT28 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 375020 FPSEstimated 64%RX 6950 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 375010 FPSEstimated 58%RX 6950 XT18 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 37505 FPSEstimated 55%RX 6950 XT10 FPSEstimated 66%
Average FPSATI Radeon HD 375073 FPSRX 6950 XT87 FPSATI Radeon HD 375056 FPSRX 6950 XT67 FPSATI Radeon HD 375030 FPSRX 6950 XT53 FPSATI Radeon HD 375013 FPSRX 6950 XT30 FPS
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

The Benchmarks section compares ATI Radeon HD 3750 and RX 6950 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexATI Radeon HD 3750RX 6950 XTDifference
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100395738%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100336565%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100326669%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1001388149%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001005755%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

The Detailed comparison section compares ATI Radeon HD 3750 and RX 6950 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexATI Radeon HD 3750RX 6950 XTDifference
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100277190%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100286985%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100326669%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 1002474102%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100316672%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling

The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares ATI Radeon HD 3750 and RX 6950 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsATI Radeon HD 3750RX 6950 XT
DirectX10.112.2
Vulkan1.4
OpenGL3.34.6
UpscalingFSR
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1

Architecture and release

The Architecture and release section compares ATI Radeon HD 3750 and RX 6950 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsATI Radeon HD 3750RX 6950 XT
ArchitectureTeraScaleRDNA 2.0
Process node55 nm7 nmBetter
Release date20082022
Device classDesktopDesktop

GPU cores, die and clocks

The Core layout and clocks section compares ATI Radeon HD 3750 and RX 6950 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsATI Radeon HD 3750RX 6950 XT
Transistor count378 million26800 millionBetter
Die size135 mm²Better520 mm²
Shader units / cores1205120Better
Base clock796 MHz1925 MHzBetter
Boost clock796 MHz2324 MHzBetter

Board size, power and compatibility

The Form factor and compatibility section compares ATI Radeon HD 3750 and RX 6950 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsATI Radeon HD 3750RX 6950 XT
InterfacePCIe 2x16PCIe 4x16
LengthVaries by board267 mm
ThicknessSingle-slotTriple-slot
Recommended PSU250 WBetter700 W
Power connectorNone8+8 pin

Display outputs and limits

The Display outputs section compares ATI Radeon HD 3750 and RX 6950 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsATI Radeon HD 3750RX 6950 XT
HDMIHDMI 2.1
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors33
Max resolution2560 × 16007680 × 4320

Memory and compute throughput

The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares ATI Radeon HD 3750 and RX 6950 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsATI Radeon HD 3750RX 6950 XT
VRAM512 MB GDDR3Better16 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Memory bus128 bit256 bitBetter
TFLOPS0.19123.65Better
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER

Other comparisons

6

Reviews and questions

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device AATI Radeon HD 375062
Device BRX 6950 XT59
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: ATI Radeon HD 3750 or RX 6950 XT?

ATI Radeon HD 3750 has the higher overall gaming score, while ATI Radeon HD 3750 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

ATI Radeon HD 3750 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

ATI Radeon HD 3750 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

ATI Radeon HD 3750 offers more overall performance, while ATI Radeon HD 3750 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

ATI Radeon HD 3750 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

ATI Radeon HD 3750 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

ATI Radeon HD 3750 leads in combined 1440p performance. ATI Radeon HD 3750 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

ATI Radeon HD 3750 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

ATI Radeon HD 3750 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

ATI Radeon HD 3750 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to ATI Radeon HD 3750 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.