H2H

ATI Radeon HD 3750 vs Radeon RX 9050 4 GB

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared ATI Radeon HD 3750 and RX 9050 4 GB across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 9050 4 GB outperforms ATI Radeon HD 3750 by 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+10%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.
QUICK COMPARISON ANALYSIS

ATI Radeon HD 3750 vs Radeon RX 9050 4 GB: key takeaway

The comparison of ATI Radeon HD 3750 and RX 9050 4 GB shows a 10% advantage for RX 9050 4 GB in gaming performance, while ATI Radeon HD 3750 may still be stronger in value for money. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Efficiency
Memory capacity
Performance
3943
Efficiency
100100
Memory capacity
1360
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMPARISON RESULT

ATI Radeon HD 3750 is the best overall choice

ATI Radeon HD 3750 leads in combined game performance. ATI Radeon HD 3750 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE5%

ATI Radeon HD 3750 leads in the combined performance index

CATALOG POSITION

Graphics card ranking

Full ranking →

The ranking is recalculated automatically from catalog data.

Positions 80–85of 319
ATI Radeon HD 3750#82position in the GPU ranking
RX 9050 4 GBnot in TOP100position in the GPU ranking
COMPARISON VERDICT

Which should you choose?

Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.

COMMUNITY CHOICE

ATI Radeon HD 3750

52 likes

Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.

$/FPSBEST PRICE / FPS

ATI Radeon HD 3750

100/100 · Price $79

The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.

OVERALL SCORE

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

The Summary score section compares ATI Radeon HD 3750 and RX 9050 4 GB with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

CategoryATI Radeon HD 3750RX 9050 4 GB
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
39
43Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
34
37Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
32
35Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
62Better
59
FULL COMPARISON

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

The Specifications section compares ATI Radeon HD 3750 and RX 9050 4 GB with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationATI Radeon HD 3750RX 9050 4 GB
InterfacePCIe 2x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Device classDesktopDesktop
Max monitors3Varies by board
Max resolution2560 × 16007680 x 4320
USB Type-CNoNo
LengthVaries by boardVaries by board
DirectX10.112 Ultimate
OpenGL3.34.6
TFLOPS0.19110.6Better
Power consumption65 WBetter92 W
Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Power connectorNone8 pin
Release date20082026
ArchitectureTeraScaleRDNA 4
ThicknessSingle-slotVaries by board
Launch price$79OEM only - not announced
Shader units / cores1201024Better
Clock speed796 MHz1920 - 2600 MHzBetter
Base clock796 MHz1920 MHzBetter
Boost clock796 MHz2600 MHzBetter
VRAM512 MB GDDR3Better4 GB GDDR6
Memory frequency1,4 GHz18 GbpsBetter
Memory bus128 bitBetter64 bit
Memory bandwidth22 GB/s144 GB/sBetter
Power consumption65 WBetter92 W
Process node55 nm4 nmBetter
Recommended PSU250 WBetter450 W
Die size135 mm²
Memory cacheL2 0.13 MB16 MBBetter
Transistor count378 million29.7 billionBetter
VulkanNot supported1.4
DisplayPortBoard dependentDisplayPort 2.1a
Compute APIOpenCL 1.xOpenCL 3.0
UpscalingNot supportedFSR 4.1
HDMIBoard dependentHDMI 2.1b
GAME TEST BENCH

Gaming FPS

Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.

The Gaming FPS section compares ATI Radeon HD 3750 and RX 9050 4 GB across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.

ATI Radeon HD 3750RX 9050 4 GB
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong

Black Myth: Wukong

1080p High
23 FPSEstimated 64%
1080p Ultra
20 FPSEstimated 64%
1440p Ultra
10 FPSEstimated 58%
4K Ultra
5 FPSEstimated 55%
Game1080p High1080p Ultra1440p Ultra4K Ultra
Black Myth: WukongATI Radeon HD 375023 FPSEstimated 64%RX 9050 4 GBATI Radeon HD 375020 FPSEstimated 64%RX 9050 4 GBATI Radeon HD 375010 FPSEstimated 58%RX 9050 4 GBATI Radeon HD 37505 FPSEstimated 55%RX 9050 4 GB
Call of Duty: WarzoneATI Radeon HD 375023 FPSEstimated 64%RX 9050 4 GBATI Radeon HD 375020 FPSEstimated 64%RX 9050 4 GBATI Radeon HD 375010 FPSEstimated 58%RX 9050 4 GBATI Radeon HD 37505 FPSEstimated 55%RX 9050 4 GB
Counter-Strike 2ATI Radeon HD 3750197 FPSEstimated 72%RX 9050 4 GBATI Radeon HD 3750139 FPSEstimated 72%RX 9050 4 GBATI Radeon HD 375075 FPSEstimated 66%RX 9050 4 GBATI Radeon HD 375027 FPSEstimated 62%RX 9050 4 GB
Cyberpunk 2077ATI Radeon HD 3750127 FPSEstimated 72%RX 9050 4 GBATI Radeon HD 3750110 FPSEstimated 72%RX 9050 4 GBATI Radeon HD 375054 FPSEstimated 66%RX 9050 4 GBATI Radeon HD 375018 FPSEstimated 62%RX 9050 4 GB
Forza Horizon 5ATI Radeon HD 3750161 FPSEstimated 78%RX 9050 4 GBATI Radeon HD 3750104 FPSEstimated 72%RX 9050 4 GBATI Radeon HD 375067 FPSEstimated 66%RX 9050 4 GBATI Radeon HD 375039 FPSEstimated 62%RX 9050 4 GB
God of War RagnarökATI Radeon HD 375023 FPSEstimated 64%RX 9050 4 GBATI Radeon HD 375020 FPSEstimated 64%RX 9050 4 GBATI Radeon HD 375010 FPSEstimated 58%RX 9050 4 GBATI Radeon HD 37505 FPSEstimated 55%RX 9050 4 GB
Hogwarts LegacyATI Radeon HD 3750104 FPSEstimated 72%RX 9050 4 GBATI Radeon HD 375087 FPSEstimated 72%RX 9050 4 GBATI Radeon HD 375048 FPSEstimated 66%RX 9050 4 GBATI Radeon HD 375018 FPSEstimated 62%RX 9050 4 GB
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024ATI Radeon HD 375023 FPSEstimated 64%RX 9050 4 GBATI Radeon HD 375020 FPSEstimated 64%RX 9050 4 GBATI Radeon HD 375010 FPSEstimated 58%RX 9050 4 GBATI Radeon HD 37505 FPSEstimated 55%RX 9050 4 GB
Monster Hunter WildsATI Radeon HD 375023 FPSEstimated 64%RX 9050 4 GBATI Radeon HD 375020 FPSEstimated 64%RX 9050 4 GBATI Radeon HD 375010 FPSEstimated 58%RX 9050 4 GBATI Radeon HD 37505 FPSEstimated 55%RX 9050 4 GB
StarfieldATI Radeon HD 375023 FPSEstimated 64%RX 9050 4 GBATI Radeon HD 375020 FPSEstimated 64%RX 9050 4 GBATI Radeon HD 375010 FPSEstimated 58%RX 9050 4 GBATI Radeon HD 37505 FPSEstimated 55%RX 9050 4 GB
Average FPSATI Radeon HD 375073 FPSRX 9050 4 GBATI Radeon HD 375056 FPSRX 9050 4 GBATI Radeon HD 375030 FPSRX 9050 4 GBATI Radeon HD 375013 FPSRX 9050 4 GB
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

The Benchmarks section compares ATI Radeon HD 3750 and RX 9050 4 GB with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexATI Radeon HD 3750RX 9050 4 GBDifference
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100394310%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100335245%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100324840%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1001360129%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

The Detailed comparison section compares ATI Radeon HD 3750 and RX 9050 4 GB with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexATI Radeon HD 3750RX 9050 4 GBDifference
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100275162%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100285056%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100324840%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100245375%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100314843%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling

The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares ATI Radeon HD 3750 and RX 9050 4 GB with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsATI Radeon HD 3750RX 9050 4 GB
DirectX10.112 Ultimate
VulkanNot supported1.4
OpenGL3.34.6
UpscalingNot supportedFSR 4.1
Compute APIOpenCL 1.xOpenCL 3.0

Architecture and release

The Architecture and release section compares ATI Radeon HD 3750 and RX 9050 4 GB with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsATI Radeon HD 3750RX 9050 4 GB
ArchitectureTeraScaleRDNA 4
Process node55 nm4 nmBetter
Release date20082026
Device classDesktopDesktop

GPU cores, die and clocks

The Core layout and clocks section compares ATI Radeon HD 3750 and RX 9050 4 GB with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsATI Radeon HD 3750RX 9050 4 GB
Transistor count378 million29.7 billionBetter
Die size135 mm²
Shader units / cores1201024Better
Base clock796 MHz1920 MHzBetter
Boost clock796 MHz2600 MHzBetter

Board size, power and compatibility

The Form factor and compatibility section compares ATI Radeon HD 3750 and RX 9050 4 GB with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsATI Radeon HD 3750RX 9050 4 GB
InterfacePCIe 2x16PCIe 5.0 x16
LengthVaries by boardVaries by board
ThicknessSingle-slotVaries by board
Recommended PSU250 WBetter450 W
Power connectorNone8 pin

Display outputs and limits

The Display outputs section compares ATI Radeon HD 3750 and RX 9050 4 GB with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsATI Radeon HD 3750RX 9050 4 GB
HDMIBoard dependentHDMI 2.1b
DisplayPortBoard dependentDisplayPort 2.1a
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors3Varies by board
Max resolution2560 × 16007680 x 4320

Memory and compute throughput

The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares ATI Radeon HD 3750 and RX 9050 4 GB with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsATI Radeon HD 3750RX 9050 4 GB
VRAM512 MB GDDR3Better4 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Memory bus128 bitBetter64 bit
TFLOPS0.19110.6Better
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER

Other comparisons

6

Reviews and questions

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device AATI Radeon HD 375062
Device BRX 9050 4 GB59
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: ATI Radeon HD 3750 or RX 9050 4 GB?

ATI Radeon HD 3750 has the higher overall gaming score, while ATI Radeon HD 3750 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

ATI Radeon HD 3750 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

ATI Radeon HD 3750 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

ATI Radeon HD 3750 offers more overall performance, while ATI Radeon HD 3750 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

ATI Radeon HD 3750 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

ATI Radeon HD 3750 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

ATI Radeon HD 3750 leads in combined 1440p performance. ATI Radeon HD 3750 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

ATI Radeon HD 3750 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

ATI Radeon HD 3750 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

ATI Radeon HD 3750 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to ATI Radeon HD 3750 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.