H2H

ATI Radeon HD 4350 vs GeForce 8800 GT

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared ATI Radeon HD 4350 and 8800 GT across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI Radeon HD 4350 outperforms 8800 GT by 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+8%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.
QUICK COMPARISON ANALYSIS

ATI Radeon HD 4350 vs GeForce 8800 GT: key takeaway

The comparison of ATI Radeon HD 4350 and 8800 GT shows a 8% advantage for ATI Radeon HD 4350 in gaming performance, while 8800 GT may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
Performance
4239
Efficiency
100100
Price / performance
100100
Memory capacity
1313
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMPARISON RESULT

ATI Radeon HD 4350 is the best overall choice

ATI Radeon HD 4350 leads in combined game performance. ATI Radeon HD 4350 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE3%

ATI Radeon HD 4350 leads in the combined performance index

PRICE DIFFERENCE$0

Prices are identical

CATALOG POSITION

Graphics card ranking

Full ranking →

The ranking is recalculated automatically from catalog data.

Positions 58–63of 319
ATI Radeon HD 4350#60position in the GPU ranking
8800 GT#73position in the GPU ranking
COMPARISON VERDICT

Which should you choose?

Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.

COMMUNITY CHOICE

ATI Radeon HD 4350

156 likes

Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.

$/FPSBEST PRICE / FPS

ATI Radeon HD 4350

100/100 · Price $79

The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.

OVERALL SCORE

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

The Summary score section compares ATI Radeon HD 4350 and 8800 GT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

CategoryATI Radeon HD 43508800 GT
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
42Better
39
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
37Better
34
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
34Better
32
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
64Better
62
FULL COMPARISON

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

The Specifications section compares ATI Radeon HD 4350 and 8800 GT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationATI Radeon HD 43508800 GT
DirectX10.110.0
OpenGL3.33.3
TFLOPS0.0960.336Better
Power consumption20 WBetter125 W
Memory typeDDR2GDDR3
Clock speed600 MHz600 MHz
Base clock600 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock600 MHz600 MHz
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.0Board dependent
Device classDesktopDesktop
Max monitors23
Max resolution4096 × 21602560 × 1600
USB Type-CNoNo
LengthVaries by board229 mm
VRAM512 MB DDR2512 MB GDDR3
Memory frequency800 MHzBetter1,8 GHz
Power connectorNone6 pin
Release date20082007
ArchitectureTeraScaleTesla
ThicknessSingle-slotSingle-slot
Compute APIOpenCL 1.1OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1
Launch price$79$79
Shader units / cores80112Better
Memory bus64 bit256 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth6400 GB/sBetter58 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 2x16PCIe 2x16
Power consumption20 WBetter125 W
Process node55 nmBetter65 nm
Recommended PSU200 WBetter300 W
Die size73 mm²Better324 mm²
Memory cacheL1 16 KB, L2 0.06 MBL2 0.06 MBBetter
Transistor count242 million754 millionBetter
VulkanNot supportedNot supported
HDMIBoard dependentBoard dependent
UpscalingNot supportedNot supported
GAME TEST BENCH

Gaming FPS

Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.

The Gaming FPS section compares ATI Radeon HD 4350 and 8800 GT across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.

ATI Radeon HD 43508800 GT
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong

Black Myth: Wukong

1080p High
24 FPSEstimated 64%
23 FPSEstimated 64%
1080p Ultra
21 FPSEstimated 64%
20 FPSEstimated 64%
1440p Ultra
12 FPSEstimated 60%
11 FPSEstimated 58%
4K Ultra
5 FPSEstimated 56%
5 FPSEstimated 55%
Game1080p High1080p Ultra1440p Ultra4K Ultra
Black Myth: WukongATI Radeon HD 435024 FPSEstimated 64%8800 GT23 FPSEstimated 64%ATI Radeon HD 435021 FPSEstimated 64%8800 GT20 FPSEstimated 64%ATI Radeon HD 435012 FPSEstimated 60%8800 GT11 FPSEstimated 58%ATI Radeon HD 43505 FPSEstimated 56%8800 GT5 FPSEstimated 55%
Call of Duty: WarzoneATI Radeon HD 435024 FPSEstimated 64%8800 GT23 FPSEstimated 64%ATI Radeon HD 435021 FPSEstimated 64%8800 GT20 FPSEstimated 64%ATI Radeon HD 435012 FPSEstimated 60%8800 GT11 FPSEstimated 58%ATI Radeon HD 43505 FPSEstimated 56%8800 GT5 FPSEstimated 55%
Counter-Strike 2ATI Radeon HD 4350204 FPSEstimated 72%8800 GT195 FPSEstimated 72%ATI Radeon HD 4350143 FPSEstimated 72%8800 GT137 FPSEstimated 72%ATI Radeon HD 435088 FPSEstimated 68%8800 GT77 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 435034 FPSEstimated 64%8800 GT29 FPSEstimated 63%
Cyberpunk 2077ATI Radeon HD 4350132 FPSEstimated 72%8800 GT126 FPSEstimated 72%ATI Radeon HD 4350113 FPSEstimated 72%8800 GT108 FPSEstimated 72%ATI Radeon HD 435064 FPSEstimated 68%8800 GT56 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 435023 FPSEstimated 64%8800 GT19 FPSEstimated 63%
Forza Horizon 5ATI Radeon HD 4350166 FPSEstimated 78%8800 GT159 FPSEstimated 78%ATI Radeon HD 4350108 FPSEstimated 72%8800 GT103 FPSEstimated 72%ATI Radeon HD 435079 FPSEstimated 68%8800 GT69 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 435049 FPSEstimated 64%8800 GT43 FPSEstimated 63%
God of War RagnarökATI Radeon HD 435024 FPSEstimated 64%8800 GT23 FPSEstimated 64%ATI Radeon HD 435021 FPSEstimated 64%8800 GT20 FPSEstimated 64%ATI Radeon HD 435012 FPSEstimated 60%8800 GT11 FPSEstimated 58%ATI Radeon HD 43505 FPSEstimated 56%8800 GT5 FPSEstimated 55%
Hogwarts LegacyATI Radeon HD 4350108 FPSEstimated 72%8800 GT103 FPSEstimated 72%ATI Radeon HD 435090 FPSEstimated 72%8800 GT86 FPSEstimated 72%ATI Radeon HD 435057 FPSEstimated 68%8800 GT50 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 435023 FPSEstimated 64%8800 GT20 FPSEstimated 63%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024ATI Radeon HD 435024 FPSEstimated 64%8800 GT23 FPSEstimated 64%ATI Radeon HD 435021 FPSEstimated 64%8800 GT20 FPSEstimated 64%ATI Radeon HD 435012 FPSEstimated 60%8800 GT11 FPSEstimated 58%ATI Radeon HD 43505 FPSEstimated 56%8800 GT5 FPSEstimated 55%
Monster Hunter WildsATI Radeon HD 435024 FPSEstimated 64%8800 GT23 FPSEstimated 64%ATI Radeon HD 435021 FPSEstimated 64%8800 GT20 FPSEstimated 64%ATI Radeon HD 435012 FPSEstimated 60%8800 GT11 FPSEstimated 58%ATI Radeon HD 43505 FPSEstimated 56%8800 GT5 FPSEstimated 55%
StarfieldATI Radeon HD 435024 FPSEstimated 64%8800 GT23 FPSEstimated 64%ATI Radeon HD 435021 FPSEstimated 64%8800 GT20 FPSEstimated 64%ATI Radeon HD 435012 FPSEstimated 60%8800 GT11 FPSEstimated 58%ATI Radeon HD 43505 FPSEstimated 56%8800 GT5 FPSEstimated 55%
Average FPSATI Radeon HD 435075 FPS8800 GT72 FPSATI Radeon HD 435058 FPS8800 GT55 FPSATI Radeon HD 435036 FPS8800 GT32 FPSATI Radeon HD 435016 FPS8800 GT14 FPS
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

The Benchmarks section compares ATI Radeon HD 4350 and 8800 GT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexATI Radeon HD 43508800 GTDifference
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10042397%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10034326%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10034326%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10013130%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

The Detailed comparison section compares ATI Radeon HD 4350 and 8800 GT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexATI Radeon HD 43508800 GTDifference
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10029277%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10030287%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10034326%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10026248%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10033316%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling

The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares ATI Radeon HD 4350 and 8800 GT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsATI Radeon HD 43508800 GT
DirectX10.110.0
VulkanNot supportedNot supported
OpenGL3.33.3
UpscalingNot supportedNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 1.1OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1

Architecture and release

The Architecture and release section compares ATI Radeon HD 4350 and 8800 GT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsATI Radeon HD 43508800 GT
ArchitectureTeraScaleTesla
Process node55 nmBetter65 nm
Release date20082007
Device classDesktopDesktop

GPU cores, die and clocks

The Core layout and clocks section compares ATI Radeon HD 4350 and 8800 GT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsATI Radeon HD 43508800 GT
Transistor count242 million754 millionBetter
Die size73 mm²Better324 mm²
Shader units / cores80112Better
Base clock600 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock600 MHz600 MHz

Board size, power and compatibility

The Form factor and compatibility section compares ATI Radeon HD 4350 and 8800 GT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsATI Radeon HD 43508800 GT
InterfacePCIe 2x16PCIe 2x16
LengthVaries by board229 mm
ThicknessSingle-slotSingle-slot
Recommended PSU200 WBetter300 W
Power connectorNone6 pin

Display outputs and limits

The Display outputs section compares ATI Radeon HD 4350 and 8800 GT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsATI Radeon HD 43508800 GT
HDMIBoard dependentBoard dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.0Board dependent
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors23
Max resolution4096 × 21602560 × 1600

Memory and compute throughput

The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares ATI Radeon HD 4350 and 8800 GT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsATI Radeon HD 43508800 GT
VRAM512 MB DDR2512 MB GDDR3
Memory typeDDR2GDDR3
Memory bus64 bit256 bitBetter
TFLOPS0.0960.336Better
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER

Other comparisons

6

Reviews and questions

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device AATI Radeon HD 435064
Device B8800 GT62
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: ATI Radeon HD 4350 or 8800 GT?

ATI Radeon HD 4350 has the higher overall gaming score, while ATI Radeon HD 4350 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

8800 GT is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

8800 GT is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

ATI Radeon HD 4350 offers more overall performance, while ATI Radeon HD 4350 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

8800 GT is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

ATI Radeon HD 4350 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

ATI Radeon HD 4350 leads in combined 1440p performance. ATI Radeon HD 4350 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

ATI Radeon HD 4350 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

ATI Radeon HD 4350 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

ATI Radeon HD 4350 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to ATI Radeon HD 4350 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.