AMD
ATI Radeon HD 4350 vs Radeon Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx
Aggregate performance score
We've compared ATI Radeon HD 4350 and Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx outperforms ATI Radeon HD 4350 by 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+5%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.ATI Radeon HD 4350 vs Radeon Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx: key takeaway
The comparison of ATI Radeon HD 4350 and Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx shows a 5% advantage for Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx in gaming performance, while ATI Radeon HD 4350 may still be stronger in value for money. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDPerformance
Price / performance
4244
100100
COMPARISON RESULT
ATI Radeon HD 4350 is the best overall choice
ATI Radeon HD 4350 leads in combined game performance. ATI Radeon HD 4350 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
ATI Radeon HD 4350 leads in the combined performance index
ATI Radeon HD 4350 costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 64–69of 317
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
ATI Radeon HD 4350
156 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
ATI Radeon HD 4350
100/100 · Price $79The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares ATI Radeon HD 4350 and Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
42
44Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
37
38Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
34
36Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
51
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
64Better
58
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares ATI Radeon HD 4350 and Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
HDMI—HDMI 2.1
DirectX10.112.2
Vulkan—1.3
OpenGL3.34.6
TFLOPS0.0960.56Better
Power consumption20 W—
Memory typeDDR2SMA
Clock speed600 MHzBetter400 - 2200 MHz
Base clock600 MHzBetter400 MHz
Boost clock600 MHz2200 MHzBetter
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.0DisplayPort 1.4a
Device classDesktopDesktop
Max monitors24
Max resolution4096 × 21607680 × 4320
USB Type-CNoNo
LengthVaries by boardVaries by board
VRAM512 MB DDR2- SMA
Memory frequency800 MHz—
Power connectorNone—
Release date20082022
ArchitectureTeraScaleNot publicly specified
ThicknessSingle-slotVaries by board
Upscaling—FSR
Compute APIOpenCL 1.1OpenCL 3.0
Launch price$79—
Shader units / cores80Not publicly specified
Memory bus64 bit—
Memory bandwidth6400 GB/s—
InterfacePCIe 2x16IGP
Power consumption20 W—
Process node55 nm6 nmBetter
Recommended PSU200 WVaries by board
Die size73 mm²Not publicly specified
Memory cacheL1 16 KB, L2 0.06 MBNot publicly specified
Transistor count242 millionNot publicly specified
GAME TEST BENCH
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares ATI Radeon HD 4350 and Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
ATI Radeon HD 4350Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong
1080p High
24 FPSEstimated 64%
22 FPSEstimated 66%
1080p Ultra
21 FPSEstimated 64%
18 FPSEstimated 66%
1440p Ultra
12 FPSEstimated 60%
14 FPSEstimated 66%
4K Ultra
5 FPSEstimated 56%
8 FPSEstimated 66%
Black Myth: WukongATI Radeon HD 435024 FPSEstimated 64%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx22 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 435021 FPSEstimated 64%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx18 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 435012 FPSEstimated 60%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx14 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 43505 FPSEstimated 56%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx8 FPSEstimated 66%
Call of Duty: WarzoneATI Radeon HD 435024 FPSEstimated 64%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx22 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 435021 FPSEstimated 64%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx18 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 435012 FPSEstimated 60%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx14 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 43505 FPSEstimated 56%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx8 FPSEstimated 66%
Counter-Strike 2ATI Radeon HD 4350204 FPSEstimated 72%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx182 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 4350143 FPSEstimated 72%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx128 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 435088 FPSEstimated 68%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx99 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 435034 FPSEstimated 64%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx49 FPSEstimated 74%
Cyberpunk 2077ATI Radeon HD 4350132 FPSEstimated 72%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx117 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 4350113 FPSEstimated 72%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx101 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 435064 FPSEstimated 68%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx72 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 435023 FPSEstimated 64%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx33 FPSEstimated 74%
Forza Horizon 5ATI Radeon HD 4350166 FPSEstimated 78%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx148 FPSEstimated 80%ATI Radeon HD 4350108 FPSEstimated 72%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx96 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 435079 FPSEstimated 68%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx89 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 435049 FPSEstimated 64%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx72 FPSEstimated 74%
God of War RagnarökATI Radeon HD 435024 FPSEstimated 64%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx22 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 435021 FPSEstimated 64%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx18 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 435012 FPSEstimated 60%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx14 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 43505 FPSEstimated 56%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx8 FPSEstimated 66%
Hogwarts LegacyATI Radeon HD 4350108 FPSEstimated 72%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx96 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 435090 FPSEstimated 72%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx80 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 435057 FPSEstimated 68%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx64 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 435023 FPSEstimated 64%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx34 FPSEstimated 74%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024ATI Radeon HD 435024 FPSEstimated 64%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx22 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 435021 FPSEstimated 64%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx18 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 435012 FPSEstimated 60%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx14 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 43505 FPSEstimated 56%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx8 FPSEstimated 66%
Monster Hunter WildsATI Radeon HD 435024 FPSEstimated 64%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx22 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 435021 FPSEstimated 64%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx18 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 435012 FPSEstimated 60%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx14 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 43505 FPSEstimated 56%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx8 FPSEstimated 66%
StarfieldATI Radeon HD 435024 FPSEstimated 64%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx22 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 435021 FPSEstimated 64%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx18 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 435012 FPSEstimated 60%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx14 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 43505 FPSEstimated 56%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx8 FPSEstimated 66%
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares ATI Radeon HD 4350 and Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10042445%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100344936%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100344426%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100130200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001000200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares ATI Radeon HD 4350 and Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100294441%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100304438%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100344426%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100264451%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100334429%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares ATI Radeon HD 4350 and Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DirectX10.112.2
Vulkan—1.3
OpenGL3.34.6
Upscaling—FSR
Compute APIOpenCL 1.1OpenCL 3.0
Architecture and release
The Architecture and release section compares ATI Radeon HD 4350 and Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
ArchitectureTeraScaleNot publicly specified
Process node55 nm6 nmBetter
Release date20082022
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
The Core layout and clocks section compares ATI Radeon HD 4350 and Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Transistor count242 millionNot publicly specified
Die size73 mm²Not publicly specified
Shader units / cores80Not publicly specified
Base clock600 MHzBetter400 MHz
Boost clock600 MHz2200 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
The Form factor and compatibility section compares ATI Radeon HD 4350 and Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
InterfacePCIe 2x16IGP
LengthVaries by boardVaries by board
ThicknessSingle-slotVaries by board
Recommended PSU200 WVaries by board
Power connectorNone—
Display outputs and limits
The Display outputs section compares ATI Radeon HD 4350 and Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
HDMI—HDMI 2.1
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.0DisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors24
Max resolution4096 × 21607680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares ATI Radeon HD 4350 and Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
VRAM512 MB DDR2- SMA
Memory typeDDR2SMA
Memory bus64 bit—
TFLOPS0.0960.56Better
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
Arc A310Intel
GTX 1050 3GBNVIDIAReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: ATI Radeon HD 4350 or Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx?+
ATI Radeon HD 4350 has the higher overall gaming score, while ATI Radeon HD 4350 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
ATI Radeon HD 4350 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
ATI Radeon HD 4350 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
ATI Radeon HD 4350 offers more overall performance, while ATI Radeon HD 4350 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
ATI Radeon HD 4350 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
ATI Radeon HD 4350 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
ATI Radeon HD 4350 leads in combined 1440p performance. ATI Radeon HD 4350 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
ATI Radeon HD 4350 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
ATI Radeon HD 4350 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
ATI Radeon HD 4350 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to ATI Radeon HD 4350 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.