NVIDIA
GeForce G100 vs Quadro NVS 315
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
Quadro NVS 315
Aggregate performance score
We've compared G100 and Quadro NVS 315 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗G100 outperforms Quadro NVS 315 by ~12% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+12%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce G100 (~12%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider G100
- Higher catalog performance index
- Lower recorded market price
- Recorded feature support: Not supported
Reasons to consider Quadro NVS 315
- More graphics memory
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3930
100100
100100
1343
Graphics card ranking
Positions 219–224of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce G100
61 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
39Better
30
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
34Better
28
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
32Better
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
57Better
51
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Device class
DirectX
OpenGL
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Recommended PSU
Length
Thickness
Architecture
Die size
Power consumptionBetter
TFLOPSBetter
Memory type
Release date
Compute API——
Launch price——
Transistor count
Shader units / cores
Memory cache
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory bus
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Vulkan
Power connector—
Upscaling
DisplayPort
HDMI
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares G100 and Quadro NVS 315 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
G100Quadro NVS 315
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
197 FPS
154 FPS
1080p Ultra
138 FPS
108 FPS
1440p Ultra
74 FPS
58 FPS
4K Ultra
27 FPS
21 FPS
Counter-Strike 2G100197 FPSQuadro NVS 315154 FPSG100138 FPSQuadro NVS 315108 FPSG10074 FPSQuadro NVS 31558 FPSG10027 FPSQuadro NVS 31521 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077G100127 FPSQuadro NVS 31599 FPSG100109 FPSQuadro NVS 31585 FPSG10054 FPSQuadro NVS 31542 FPSG10018 FPSQuadro NVS 31514 FPS
Forza Horizon 5G100160 FPSQuadro NVS 315125 FPSG100104 FPSQuadro NVS 31581 FPSG10067 FPSQuadro NVS 31552 FPSG10039 FPSQuadro NVS 31531 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyG100104 FPSQuadro NVS 31581 FPSG10087 FPSQuadro NVS 31568 FPSG10048 FPSQuadro NVS 31538 FPSG10018 FPSQuadro NVS 31514 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100393026%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10032306%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10032346%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1001343107%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100273629%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100283522%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10032346%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100243743%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10031349%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX10.012.0
VulkanNot supported1.2
OpenGL3.34.6
UpscalingNot supportedNot supported
Compute API——
Architecture and release
ArchitectureNot publicly specifiedNot publicly specified
Process node65 nm40 nmBetter
Release date20092013
Device classDesktopProf
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor countNot publicly specifiedNot publicly specified
Die sizeNot publicly specifiedNot publicly specified
Shader units / coresNot publicly specifiedNot publicly specified
Base clock567 MHzBetter523 MHz
Boost clock567 MHzBetter523 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 2x16PCIe 2x16
LengthVaries by boardVaries by board
ThicknessVaries by boardVaries by board
Recommended PSUVaries by boardVaries by board
Power connectorNone (slot power)—
Display outputs and limits
HDMIBoard dependentBoard dependent
DisplayPortBoard dependentBoard dependent
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitorsVaries by boardVaries by board
Max resolutionVaries by boardVaries by board
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM512 MB DDR2Better1 GB DDR3
Memory typeDDR2DDR3
Memory bus64 bit64 bit
TFLOPS0.0210.026Better
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 65
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (4)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (3)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: G100 or Quadro NVS 315?+
G100 has the higher overall gaming score, while G100 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
G100 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
G100 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
G100 offers more overall performance, while G100 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
G100 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
G100 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
G100 leads in combined 1440p performance. G100 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
G100 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Quadro NVS 315 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Quadro NVS 315 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to G100 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.