NVIDIA
GeForce 510M vs GeForce GTX 295
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GTX 295
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce 510M and GTX 295 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗GeForce 510M outperforms GTX 295 by ~23% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+23%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce 510M (~38%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider GeForce 510M
- Higher catalog performance index
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: CUDA / OpenCL · Not supported
Reasons to consider GTX 295
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.3 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIAPerformance
Price / performance
3831
6552
Graphics card ranking
Positions 99–104of 411
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce GTX 295
134 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
38Better
31
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
34Better
29
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
31Better
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
33
36Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
40Better
29
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DirectX
OpenGL
HDMI
DisplayPort
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Transistor count
Die size
Power consumption—
Architecture
Memory type
Launch price—
Recommended PSU
Length
Thickness
Shader units / cores
Memory cache
Clock speed—
Memory frequency—
Memory bandwidth—
Power consumption—
Release date
Power connector
Vulkan
Compute API
Base clock
Boost clock
Device class
Upscaling
Interface
VRAM
Memory bus
TFLOPS
Process nodeBetter
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares GeForce 510M and GTX 295 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
GeForce 510MGTX 295
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
157 FPS
152 FPS
1080p Ultra
111 FPS
107 FPS
1440p Ultra
86 FPS
60 FPS
4K Ultra
43 FPS
23 FPS
Counter-Strike 2GeForce 510M157 FPSGTX 295152 FPSGeForce 510M111 FPSGTX 295107 FPSGeForce 510M86 FPSGTX 29560 FPSGeForce 510M43 FPSGTX 29523 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077GeForce 510M102 FPSGTX 29598 FPSGeForce 510M88 FPSGTX 29584 FPSGeForce 510M62 FPSGTX 29543 FPSGeForce 510M29 FPSGTX 29515 FPS
Forza Horizon 5GeForce 510M128 FPSGTX 295124 FPSGeForce 510M83 FPSGTX 29580 FPSGeForce 510M77 FPSGTX 29554 FPSGeForce 510M63 FPSGTX 29533 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyGeForce 510M83 FPSGTX 29580 FPSGeForce 510M69 FPSGTX 29567 FPSGeForce 510M56 FPSGTX 29539 FPSGeForce 510M29 FPSGTX 29515 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100383120%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100383120%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100383411%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100043200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100036200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10038365%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10038365%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100383411%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10038380%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10038358%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX11.010.0
VulkanVulkan 1.2 (driver support)Not supported
OpenGL4.63.3
UpscalingNot supportedNot supported
Compute APICUDA / OpenCLOpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.3
Architecture and release
ArchitectureFermiTesla 2.0
Process nodeTSMC 40 nmBetter55 nm
Release date20112009
Device classMobileDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor countNot publicly specified1400 million
Die sizeNot publicly specified470 mm²
Shader units / coresNot publicly specified240
Base clockOEM/TGP dependent576 MHz
Boost clockOEM/TGP dependent576 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfaceOEM platform dependentPCIe 2x16
LengthOEM dependent267 mm
ThicknessOEM dependentDual-slot
Recommended PSUOEM dependent600 W
Power connectorIntegrated laptop power6+8 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIOEM dependentHDMI
DisplayPortOEM dependentBoard dependent
USB Type-COEM dependentNo
Max monitorsOEM dependent3
Max resolutionOEM dependent2560 × 1600
Memory and compute throughput
VRAMOEM configuration dependent1,75 GB GDDR3
Memory typeGDDR5 / DDR3GDDR3
Memory busOEM configuration dependent448x2 bit
TFLOPSOEM/TGP dependent0.596
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 64
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (3)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (4)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record changed: product_prices
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: GeForce 510M or GTX 295?+
GeForce 510M has the higher overall gaming score, while GeForce 510M offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GeForce 510M is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GeForce 510M is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
GeForce 510M offers more overall performance, while GeForce 510M offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GeForce 510M is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GeForce 510M is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
GeForce 510M leads in combined 1440p performance. GeForce 510M can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
GeForce 510M is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GTX 295 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GTX 295 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to GeForce 510M if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.